Enforcement of ship sulphur standards

Photo: Roman Harald/flickr.com/CC BY-NC-ND

Member states must carry out inspections on at least one-tenth of the ships calling each year, and test the fuel on at least 20–40 per cent of the inspected ships.

A new set of rules that require member states to check compliance with the EU’s ship fuel sulphur regulation was agreed in December 2014 and published in February.

The new rules can be seen as a first response to increasing criticism about the lax regimes currently in place to ensure enforcement of environmental standards for international shipping, and is directly linked to the recent entry into force of the 0.10 per cent sulphur limit on marine fuels used within emission control areas (ECAs) as from 1 January 2015.

For Europe, the stricter sulphur standards mean that ships in the North Sea and Baltic Sea must use low-sulphur fuels or apply approved abatement technology to achieve equivalent emission reductions.

Rules concerning inspections, sampling methods and frequency, as well as reporting, are laid down in a Commission Implementing Decision, which states that sampling of marine fuel on board ships should be carried out either by analysing a fuel spot sample from the ship’s fuel service system, or by analysing the relevant sealed bunker samples on board.

When it comes to sampling of marine fuels while being delivered to ships, this should target marine fuel suppliers who have been repeatedly found not to comply with the specification stated on the bunker delivery note.

Member states must carry out inspections of ships’ logbooks and bunker delivery notes (BDN) on at least 10 per cent of the total number of individual ships calling in the relevant member state each year.

From 1 January 2016, member states must also carry out sulphur tests on the marine fuel being used on board on a certain percentage of ships calling at their ports. This varies from 40 per cent (of the minimum 10 per cent ships that are to be inspected) for countries fully bordering ECAs, to 30 per cent for those partly bordering ECAs, and down to 20 per cent for countries not bordering ECAs.

Establishing minimum inspection, sampling and reporting requirements is however only a first step – in order to ensure compliance there must also be penalties in place for non-compliance, but this issue is not part of the new inspection and reporting rules.

According to the EU sulphur directive, it is up to the member states to determine the penalties. It is stated that: “The penalties determined must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include fines calculated in such a way as to ensure that the fines at least deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringement and that those fines gradually increase for repeated infringements.”

Over the past few years, there have been discussions in member states such as Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden and Finland on the need to introduce such penalties, and to ensure a workable and effective legal system to implement the sanctions.

However, it still appears uncertain how many – if any – member states have such “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” penalties in place. It is also not clear how many member states – if any – have a legal system in place that ensures that those found to be in breach of the standards will actually be made to pay the penalties.

Christer Ågren

Source: “Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/253 of 16 February 2015 laying down the rules concerning the sampling and reporting under Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels.” Official Journal of the European Union L041.

In this issue

Bridge to nowhere

Is natural gas a “bridge” to a sustainable energy system? That is what the gas industry has been saying for decades. But the bridge is not needed. Sustainable technology is here now.

Editorial: 1.5°C to stay alive

Greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced drastically to avoid dangerous climate change due to rising global temperature and to fulfil the objective of the 1992 UN Climate Convention.

Flexibilities threaten emission cuts from MCPs

Member states want to water down proposed new emission standards for medium-sized combustion plants, and there is now a risk that the European Parliament will push for even more exemptions.

Falling costs for renewable energy

A report from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) highlights the plummeting costs for renewable energy – making renewable energy more competitive then ever.

EU industrial air pollution cost up to €189 billion per year

The cost of damage caused by pollutant emissions into the air from the largest 14,000 industrial facilities in 2012 has been estimated as at least €59-189 billion, and half of the total cost was caused by just one per cent of the industrial plants.

German experts: Nitrogen cuts urgently needed

Excessive emissions of nitrogen compounds into the environment pose a threat to human health, waterways, biodiversity, and the climate.

Norwegian CCS ambitions might move to the EU

Norway wants an agreement with the EU on collective delivery of a common climate target. This could make it easier to finance a full-scale CCS plant in one of the EU member states.

Modest growth of renewables in EU area

An EEA report shows modest growth in renewable energy consumption with a dominance by PV and wind in 2013. Another study claims that the integration of around 60 per cent ..

Enforcement of ship sulphur standards

Member states must carry out inspections on at least one-tenth of the ships calling each year, and test the fuel on at least 20–40 per cent of the inspected ships.

Launch of Energy Union – mixed messages

The Commission proposes a range of policy and legislative packages to realise the Energy Union in the next five years. Environmental organisations are critical of mixed messages, inconsistencies and continued reliance on fossil fuels.

Bad air quality prevails

More than nine out of ten urban citizens in the EU are exposed to harmful levels of the air pollutants PM_2.5 and ozone.

Carbon storage a dead-end

CCS could make sense for industrial emissions. Or, then again, maybe not.

East German lignite at a crossroads

Lignite power in eastern Germany is disastrous for the climate and displaces more people than any other industry in Europe. Despite a target of 80 per cent renewable energy by 2050, phase-out plans are conspicuous by their absence.

Achieving NEC targets will cost less

Achieving the Commission’s health protection target for 2030 will be a third cheaper than previously estimated, according to new data.

Sweden: High health costs of bad air quality

Every year over 5,000 people in Sweden die prematurely due to air pollution, and the annual cost to society of health damage due to nitrogen oxides and particulate matter is estimated at SEK 42 billion.

Main menu

Enforcement of ship sulphur standards

In this issue

Bridge to nowhere

Editorial: 1.5°C to stay alive

Flexibilities threaten emission cuts from MCPs

Falling costs for renewable energy

EU industrial air pollution cost up to €189 billion per year

German experts: Nitrogen cuts urgently needed

Norwegian CCS ambitions might move to the EU

Modest growth of renewables in EU area

Enforcement of ship sulphur standards

Launch of Energy Union – mixed messages

Bad air quality prevails

Carbon storage a dead-end

East German lignite at a crossroads

Achieving NEC targets will cost less

Sweden: High health costs of bad air quality

Publications

Food for Thought

Northern forests, climate change and the UNFCCC

EU climate targets aligned with the Paris agreement’s 1.5°C objective

Baltic Sea Offshore Wind Collaborative-Learning project

Air pollution in Europe and children’s health

Climate Change: A Himalayan Odessey

No further discussion needed. The agreed global goal is to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C

Fossil-free electricity 2021

What we do

Air pollution

Climate Change

Policy initiatives

Do Your Bit!