Countries agreed on a two-step approach. Image: © Master1305 – Shutterstock.com

COP29 in Baku delivered controversial climate finance outcome

At the last climate summit (COP29) which took place in November 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan, countries both welcomed and rejected the conclusions related to climate finance.

In fact, countries partially adopted the recommendations of the Independent High-level Expert Group on Climate Finance landmark report, but missed the ball on a number of important elements of the report.

In Baku, countries agreed on a two-step approach, in line with the proposal from the High-level Expert Group: 

  • an overarching goal for all countries to mobilise $1.3 trillion by 2035 for developing countries, from various sources, for which Brazil and Azerbaijan have been tasked to develop a plan on how to achieve this target (the “Baku to Belém Roadmap to 1.3 trillion”); and
  • a specific goal for developed countries to mobilise $300 billion by 2035, from public and private sources, both bilateral and multilateral, and including voluntary contributions from developing countries.

The above clearly was inspired by the climate finance staircase that the High-Level Expert Group proposed, but it mixed up the definitions of the different elements of the staircase. In fact, the High-Level Group proposed a minimum contribution from bilateral and multilateral public sources of $320 to $400 billion, but this number excluded both private finance and contributions from developing countries (both of which are included in the $300 billion agreed in Baku). Because the Baku conclusions mixed up public and private sources, it is unclear what the difference is and will be between the $300 and the $1,300 commitments.

It is vital that developed countries substantially increase their grants (not loans) to developing countries to support climate action. However, reactions to the Baku outcome by developed countries have been rather disappointing, with many countries skipping their part of the commitments, pointing to other countries or to political decisions at home to reduce rather than expand their development aid.

Source: https://unclimatesummit.org/the-cop29-finance-staircase

Image: © Lightspring – Shutterstock.com

Editorial: A New Chapter for Acid News

Since 1982, AirClim – a joint venture of four environmental organizations in Sweden – has received annual operational support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. This funding has covered about half of our annual budget and been central to our work, enabling us to publish Acid News in print and to deliver independent, science-based reporting on acidification, air pollution, climate, energy, transport , agriculture and environmental policy. 

Hard to abate industries?

There is a notion that there is a large group of emissions that are hard to abate, and therefore need either CCS on those emissions (effectively ‘turning the chimneys down’ into the underground) or negative emissions (to suck back CO2 from the atmosphere after it has been emitted). This notion has gone viral in the climate policy discussion. It is now the main justification for CCS.
Illustration: © Lars-Erik Håkansson
Increased energy storage is one of the components in the PAC scenario. Photo: © Rotorworx 1 – Shutterstock.com

NGO scenario shows how the EU and its 27 Member States can go net zero by 2040

Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe recently updated its Paris Agreement Compatible (PAC) scenario in which it describes how the European Union can become climate neutral by 2040, ten years earlier than the EU’s official target date.
Photo: © Jacopo Landi – Shutterstock.com

Freeing up the bottlenecks and accelerating offshore wind deployment

Offshore wind energy holds immense promise for meeting Europe’s renewable energy and climate goals. However, barriers such as stakeholder collaboration, grid infrastructure limitations, and slow permitting processes must be addressed to unlock the sector’s full potential.

Top EU industrial emitters: still dirty, but not so hard to abate

The 100 largest industrial emitters in the EU-27 are presented.

Voestalpine Stahl in Linz. © fivetonine – shutterstock.com
Photo: © Kedardome – shutterstock.com

The climate benefit of Swedish forests can be improved

The most effective way to improve the climate benefit of Swedish forests is by harvesting less. This is a brief summary of the current state of knowledge.

Photo: © Zigmunds Dizgalvis – Shutterstock.com

With low-cost renewable electricity we can meet climate targets.

Falling costs for solar, wind, and batteries are making renewables the dominant force in electricity. With speed and scale, they can deliver the emissions cuts we need – if politics doesn’t get in the way.

Photo: © AFilipczuk – Shutterstock.com

Sink or Source - Northern forests at a cross-roads

Tropical forests get most of the attention, but northern forests are under growing threat too. A new report by AirClim explores the risks—and what can be done to protect them.

COP29 in Baku delivered controversial climate finance outcome

At the last climate summit (COP29) which took place in November 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan, countries both welcomed and rejected the conclusions related to climate finance.

Countries agreed on a two-step approach. Image: © Master1305 – Shutterstock.com
Photo: © Lasse Johansson – Shutterstock.com

Carbon uptake by Swedish forests falls sharply

Sweden faces an uphill struggle to meet EU climate targets for its forests by 2030.

Photo: © Steve Branislav Cerven – Shutterstock.com

Air pollution down across EU, but ammonia remains a challenge

Emissions of key air pollutants continue to decline across most EU countries, according to a new assessment published by the European Environment Agency (EEA) on 27 June 2025.
Topographic map of the Nordic Seas and subpolar basins with schematic circulation of surface currents (solid curves) and deep currents (dashed curves) that form a portion of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Image: R. Curry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution/Science/USGCRP., CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

“We don’t know where the tipping point is”

Climate expert on potential collapse of Atlantic circulation

Guess what birds need to worry about? Image: © Apisit Hrpp – Shutterstock.com

Wind farms are not the main threat to birdlife

For many years now, the fossil fuel industry has supported claims that wind mills and wind farms are harmful to birds as they are often sited on important bird migration routes.

View of Dudhichua coal mine in India. Photo: Rosehubwiki, Ramkesh Patel, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A fossil fuel economy requires 500 times more mining than a clean energy economy

The transition away from fossil fuels will increase the need for minerals such as copper, lithium, nickel and cobalt. Electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, transmission grids, etc. will all need these raw materials in amounts much bigger than today.

Woman running through an outdoor misting machine on a street on hot summer day in Paris, France. Photo: © Here Now – Shutterstock.com

Mapping the world’s climate danger zones

Global emergence of regional heatwave hotspots outpaces climate model simulations.