Photo: © Erickson Stock – Shutterstock.com

Richest 1% of the world responsible for 17% of emissions

New analysis taking into account rich people’s consumption behaviour as well as their investment decisions shows a widening gap in responsibility for the climate crisis between rich and poor.

The quest for climate justice has been a core driver for the climate movement from the very start, resulting in the integration of the equity concept in the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Despite this, inequality has grown and climate injustice has continued. This is partly because climate justice and equity have been predominantly defined from a perspective of rich versus poor countries (which is logical in the context of the UNFCCC, where countries negotiate with each other). Unfortunately, climate injustice and inequality not only exist between countries, but it is also important to look at inequality within countries. Some would even argue that the gap between the global rich and the global poor (across all countries) is more important than the division between rich and poor countries. A new study by Lucas Chancel from the Global Inequality Lab, published in Nature Sustainability1, provides some useful additional data to this debate. The author assessed not only the impact of individuals’ greenhouse gas emissions through their consumption behaviour, but also looked at the impact of their investment decisions. The findings indicate that when calculating the impact of the global rich on climate change, their investment decisions are actually more important than their consumption behaviour.

Here we highlight some of the findings of this interesting study through four graphs.

1. Global emissions by income group
Figure 1 shows the average per capita emissions of different global income groups (top), the total share of emissions of each income group (bottom) and table 1 provides with a further breakdown of these numbers. It shows that the poorest 50% of the world population emitted 12% of global emissions in 2019, whereas the richest 10% emitted 48% of the total, and the top 1% was responsible for 17% of all emissions. It is clear that global carbon emissions inequality is huge; close to half of all emissions are released by one-tenth of the global population, and just one-hundredth of the world population (77 million individuals) emits about 50% more than the entire bottom half of the population (3.8 billion individuals). The conclusion is clear: in the short term the biggest reductions will have to be made by the richest 10% of the global population, wherever they live.
(Per-capita emissions include emissions from domestic consumption, public and private investments, and imports and exports of carbon embedded in goods and services traded with the rest of the world.)

Figure 1. Global emissions by group in 2019. Per-capita emissions include emissions from domestic consumption, public and private investments as well as imports and exports of carbon embedded in goods and services traded with the rest of the world.

Table 1. Global emissions inequality in 2019: summary table

 Number of individuals (million)Average (tonnes CO2 per capita)  Threshold (tonnes CO2 per capita)Share (% total)
Full population 7,710 <0.1100%
Bottom 50%3,855 1.4 <0.111.5%
incl. bottom 20%1,5420.7<0.12.3%
incl. next 30%2,3151.8 1.19.2%
Middle 40%3,08462.840.5%
Top 10%771291348%
incl. top 1%77.11014716.9%
incl. top 0.1%7.714251257.1%
incl. top 0.01%0.7712.3325663.9%

             

2. Per capita emissions for different income groups, by region
Figure 2 shows  average per capita emissions for different income groups across different regions, and shows that for most regions (except Africa) the 10% richest have higher per capita emissions than the developed countries’ middle class (except for North America). North America tops the range for all income groups and strikingly even the poorest half is responsible for per capita emissions of 10 ton, which matches the per capita emissions of the middle group in Europe despite the latter being substantially richer. The sharpest contrast is in East Asia where the poorest half is responsible for on average 2.9 ton of emissions, while the middle 40% emits nearly 8 ton, and the top 10% almost 40 ton.

Figure 2. Per-capita emissions (tCO2) in 2019, of the top 10%, middle 40%, and bottom 50% if emitters, grouped by region.

3. Emissions growth for different income groups between 1990 and 2019
In figure 3 global polluters are ranked from the least emitting to the highest on the X axis, while their per-capita emissions growth rate between 1990 and 2019 is presented on the Y axis. Since 1990, average global per capita emissions grew by 2.3%. The per-capita emissions of the bottom 50% grew faster than the average (26%), while per capita emissions of the middle 40% fell by about 5–15% for per centiles p75 to p95. This segment of the world population largely corresponds to the lower- and middle-income groups of the rich countries, which have seen their emissions fall due to economic changes (de-industrialisation) and climate policies. The same trend is not visible for the top 1%, whose per-capita emissions have grown immensely and are responsible for a quarter of the global growth in emissions since 1990.

Figure 3. Emissions growth by percentile over 1990-2019.

4. Growing emissions inequality between vs. within countries
In figure 4, a schematic overview is given of the inequality dynamics since 1990. Global carbon inequality dynamics are governed by two forces: the evolution of average emission inequalities between countries and the evolution of emission inequalities within countries. In 1990, emissions inequality was mostly (62%) due to differences between countries. Back then, the average citizen of a rich country polluted unequivocally more than the rest of the world, and income inequalities within countries were on average lower than today. The situation has entirely changed since then. Within-country emission inequalities now account for nearly two-thirds of global emissions inequality. This does not mean that important inequalities in emissions between countries and regions have disappeared, but points instead to the fact that on top of the inequality in carbon emissions between countries, there are even greater emission inequalities between individuals within countries. Both elements must therefore be taken into account when developing global approaches and all of the big emitters need to contribute to stringent emission reduction efforts. No member of the top 1% should be allowed to shirk their responsibility on the basis of between country inequalities.

Figure 4: Global emissions inequality between vs within countries.

 

Wendel Trio

1Chancel, L. (2022) Global Carbon Inequality over 1990-2019. Nature Sustainability. www.nature.com/articles/s41893-022-00955-z

© Lars-Erik Håkansson

Greater efforts to improve EU air quality needed

The proposal for a new EU air quality standard is an important step closer to the WHO's guidelines, but there are still health and economic gains in lowering the acceptable levels even further.

Photo: © Frank Middendorf – Shutterstock.com

Editorial: Air pollution exposure will remain unacceptably high

Air pollution is the leading environmental risk factor affecting public health in Europe. The current EU annual PM₂.₅ ambient air quality standard is relatively lax, and notably higher ...

Nitrogen ruling puts Dutch CCS project on hold

In 2017 the environmental organisation Mobilisation for the Environment (MOB) went to the European Court of Justice to challenge the Dutch system ...

Photo: © Steve Photography – Shutterstock.com
Photo: © Ingo Bartussek – Shutterstock.com

Ways through the rare earth element bottleneck

It has never been so important to find ways to overcome the barriers of dependency on rare earth elements for the renewable energy transition.

Photo: © Fabrizio Maffei – Shutterstock.com

Climate change will worsen air quality

Scenarios show that global warming will increase the formation of ozone in densely populated regions, and forest fires can affect particle levels far away from the fires.

The remaining global carbon budget leaves little headroom for Europe

As the world fails to reduce emissions fast enough, the remaining carbon budget is shrinking rapidly, as shown by recent studies on carbon budgets for Germany and for Europe.

Photo: © Juergen Nowak– Shutterstock.com
Photo: © Erickson Stock – Shutterstock.com

Richest 1% of the world responsible for 17% of emissions

New analysis taking into account rich people’s consumption behaviour as well as their investment decisions shows a widening gap in responsibility for the climate crisis between rich and poor

Photo: © Dragan Mujan – Shutterstock.com

Health effects of extreme high temperatures

The effects of climate change are becoming increasingly clear, and the impact of high temperatures is felt universally. AirClim has co-published ...

Air pollution can damage children for life

Exposure to air pollution can prevent children's organs from developing to full capacity, since they have more sensitive lungs and immature immune systems.

Photo: © Sharomka – Shutterstock.com
Photo: © eagnarin wanvong – Shutterstock.com

Proposal to integrate maritime transport in the EU ETS

In July 2021, the European Commission proposed, as part of the Fit-for-55 package, to amend the Emissions Trading Directive by including maritime transport in the EU ETS.

Photo: © TR STOK – Shutterstock.com

EU must phase-out coal and gas and promote plant-rich diets to deliver on methane

The draft Methane Action Plan mostly lists existing policies and proposals. To fulfill its 30% reduction commitment the EU must include action to slash the use of fossil fuels and reduce meat consumption.

Whole of Europe must do more to align with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target

New scientific report presents technically feasible, 1.5°C compatible energy and emissions pathways for the group of 46 countries that make up the whole of Europe.

The higher the energy efficiency target, the greater the benefits

A new report by Cambridge Econometrics quantifies the benefits resulting from higher levels of ambition for the 2030 energy efficiency target.

Regulating the most polluting livestock farms is justified

Revising the Industrial Emissions Directive to include cattle and lower the size threshold to 150 Livestock Units will only affect 13% of the EU’s largest commercial farms.

EU must reform the ETS to make it an effective instrument

The Oeko-Institut suggests a number of technical measures that could be used to strengthen the EU ETS in the coming years.

European research infrastructures for climate change and air pollution policies

Behind the acronyms of European research infrastructures there are some useful resources. Here is an overview of some of the most significant.

Limited environmental benefits with Euro 7 proposal

For many, the publication of the long-awaited Euro 7 was a large disappointment. The proposal suggests maintaining the Euro 6 standards for tailpipe NOx ...

Over 20,000 died in western Europe’s summer heatwaves, figures show

The Guardian reports that more than 20,000 people died across western Europe in this summer’s heatwaves, in temperatures ...

EU avoids €11bn in gas costs thanks to solar and wind

A new study by E3G and Ember shows that wind and solar produced 25% of EU electricity since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Given the rampant inflation mainly caused ...

New guidance document for nitrogen management

A new guidance document “Nitrogen Opportunities for Agriculture, Food & Environment”, officially adopted by the Air Convention, was published in November 2022.

Europe, China and the US could decarbonise 84% of global shipping emissions without IMO

A recent briefing from Transport & Environment (T&E) shows that Europe, China and the US could decarbonise 84% of all global shipping emissions without falling ...

First Forum for International Cooperation on Air Pollution

The first Taskforce Meeting of the Forum for International Cooperation on Air Pollution (FICAP) under the UNECE Convention ...

Air pollution major cause of death in Africa

A new report on the state of the air in Africa has been released. It shows that the African continent suffers from some ...

Emission Guide for Businesses

A Practical Guide For Business Air Pollutant Emission Assessment is a guide developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute ...

Clean air in courts

When scientists announce that the air you’re breathing is far more dangerous than previously understood, and your government does nothing ...

Western Balkans to receive a €500 million energy support package

In late October, commission chief Ursula von der Leyen announced that the European Union has pledged €500 million to improve the energy sector ...

Financial support for fertiliser industry

On 9 November the European Commission presented a communication on “Ensuring availability and affordability of fertilisers”. It was announced as late as ...

Delhi choking again

During the first week of November, New Delhi’s air quality index was 472 with some areas recording values exceeding 800 ...

Europeans worried about air pollution

A new Eurobarometer survey published at the end of October shows that Europeans worry about air pollution. For those that had heard about the AAQDs ...

Carbon certification proposal risks climate action

On the last day of November, the EU Commission launched its proposal for certifying removals of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as part of its efforts to reach zero emissions by 2050.