Fredrik Lundberg

There is a notion that there is a large group of emissions that are hard to abate, and therefore need either CCS on those emissions (effectively ‘turning the chimneys down’ into the underground) or negative emissions (to suck back CO2 from the atmosphere after it has been emitted). This notion has gone viral in the climate policy discussion. It is now the main justification for CCS.

Frequently asked questions about CCS and CDR technologies are discussed and answered.

Ranking of best climate policy measures in the region.

Ranking of best climate policy measures in the region.

This report takes a look behind the bright vision of carbon capture and storage (CCS) given by proponents of this technology. It is not intended to damn CCS but is an appeal for wise decision-making.

WIth much air pollution coming from large combustion plants, revision of this directive is of exceptional importance.