No. 3, October 2000 |

Download this issue

No 2, June 2000 |

Download this issue

No. 1, March 2000 |

Download this issue

No. 3, October 2000

In this issue: Editorial: Past and future. The 100 worst sulphur emitters. Global sulphur emissions. EU NEC directive. Limits for existing LCPs. Transport trends. Eastern Germany. After twenty years: Special section.

Publications

Report

Baltic Sea Offshore Wind Collaborative-Learning project

The Baltic Sea Offshore Wind Collaborative-Learning (BALOWIL) is a pilot project aiming to find new ways of addressing offshore wind conflicts.

Emissions trading system for road transport and buildings in the policy mix for achieving climate neutrality in the EU.

Extreme temperatures a threat to human health

Extreme high temperatures

– a threat to human health
A summary of knowledge

Briefing

1.5°C Pathways for the EU27: accelerating climate action to deliver the Paris Agreement

Briefing

1.5°C Pathways for the Council of Europe: accelerating climate action to deliver the Paris Agreement

Briefing

Failing to achieve 1.5°C puts a huge economic burden on our (grand)children

Short briefing which calculates, based on methodology developed by the London School of Economics, what the costs of action and inaction would be for several EU scenarios. The briefing finds that current policies would lead to a GDP loss of 7.11%/year by 2100, while implementing the Fit for 55 proposals would lead to an annual loss of 2.58%. Opting for a real 1.5°C compatible pathway on the other hand would lead to an increase of GDP of 0.84%. The benefits of increasing ambition are thus also important in economic terms. In particular for future generations as they will foot the bill of our inaction.

Briefing

Policy implications of Europe’s dwindling carbon budget

Defining 1.5°C compatible CO₂ targets and climate finance responsibilities for a range of European countries
This briefing aims to contribute to the discussion on the potential application of carbon budgets in the policy debate by identifying both emission reduction targets and climate finance responsibilities for 42 European countries based on a 1.5°C compatible global carbon budget.

Briefing

The EU too must revisit its 2030 climate pledge (NDC ) as -55% is not compatible with 1.5°C

Briefing

Making the EU ETS and ESR legislation compatible with the Paris Agreement

To all publications

Main menu

No. 3, October 2000

Publications

Baltic Sea Offshore Wind Collaborative-Learning project

Air pollution in Europe and children’s health

No further discussion needed

Fossil-free electricity 2021

Emissions trading system for road transport and buildings in the policy mix for achieving climate neutrality in the EU.

Extreme high temperatures

1.5°C Pathways for the EU27: accelerating climate action to deliver the Paris Agreement

1.5°C Pathways for the Council of Europe: accelerating climate action to deliver the Paris Agreement

Failing to achieve 1.5°C puts a huge economic burden on our (grand)children

Policy implications of Europe’s dwindling carbon budget

The EU too must revisit its 2030 climate pledge (NDC ) as -55% is not compatible with 1.5°C

Making the EU ETS and ESR legislation compatible with the Paris Agreement

What we do

Air pollution

Climate Change

Policy initiatives

Do Your Bit!