Sweden and the climate change performance index

Sweden usually ranks highly on the climate change performance index (CCPI), published by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe. In 2015 it was #2, and in the three previous years it was #4, #2 and #1 among ranked nations, essentially the OECD and some others. The formal ranking is actually lower, but the scorecard leaves the first three places vacant, as a statement that no nation is on track to climate sustainability.

Nevertheless, Sweden is clearly top of the class. A quite easy task, according to many people within the Swedish NGO community.

This is not to say that there is anything fundamentally wrong with the index. Just that its methodology fits Sweden very well.

Sweden has a power system based on hydro (50 per cent) and nuclear (35–40 per cent), with the remainder mainly wind power and biomass CHP.  The hydro plants were built long ago, before climate was an issue, but it rains more than it used to. Nuclear power also preceded climate policy, as did most of the district heating and biomass use.

Sweden has almost no fossil power and not much fossil heat.

These factors automatically give Sweden a high score for low CO₂ emissions per capita, low emissions per GDP unit, high renewables share, and for “efficiency” as defined by the CCPI, which is CO₂ emitted per total energy supply.

The index measures both levels and trends, and Sweden’s trends are not so bad. Before the index started we had the worst gas-guzzling cars in Europe, because they were mainly produced by Volvo and Saab. The spectacular improvement mainly reflects how bad the situation was.

As for electricity, Sweden used to have an absurd overconsumption per capita, now slowly levelling off to a more normal European standard. Building automation in industry, offices and flats has cut electric power use. Heat pumps replace direct electric heating. Electricity demand has dropped some 8 per cent from the 2001 peak. 

Sweden’s nuclear power is getting old, or is poorly managed, or both, so it has produced fewer TWh since 2006 than before. This means, by definition, a higher efficiency for the economy, because nuclear power wastes a lot of energy as tepid water that is discharged into the sea. The energy loss is included in the energy supply.

Emissions from industry have also dropped, mainly because the market for cement, steel, ore, etc., has not quite recovered since 2008. The paper and pulp industry also switched from expensive oil to cheap biomass.

Some of the good scores are results of national policy. Sweden will produce 15–16 TWh of wind power in 2015, against only 1 TWh in 2006, a result of the green certificates. Sweden has built most wind power per capita in the world over the last few years. This is due to Green Certificates, enacted in 2003, but most of the increase took place from 2012 on. 

Biomass use for heating and electricity has a long tradition, but it has been sustained and expanded to vehicle fuels.

Most of the index, 80 percent, uses objective criteria. Sweden comes out well because the country is large, and it rains a lot, so we have a high proportion of hydropower and extensive forests. That gave us a good head-start. The remaining 20 per cent is judgemental, from experts, on policy.

Sweden has done a few good things, such as pioneering heat pumps and efficient windows and some good biofuels. Our greenhouse gas emissions have dropped continuously, and may well continue to do so, though three out of 12 nuclear power reactors are shut down, and another three will be closed down by or before 2020.

We did nothing to pioneer the real climate-savers from scratch, as Denmark did with wind power and Germany with photovoltaics. Maybe they did better in that respect because they had a more uphill task, starting with a lot of coal power.

 

Fredrik Lundberg

See also article in Acid News 1, 2016 p.6-7
http://www.airclim.org/acidnews/how-account-emissions-greenhouse-gases-i...

Reference: climate-change-performance-index-2016. http://www.caneurope.org/can-and-press/935-climate-change-performance-in...

Ecosystems more sensitive than previously thought

Three-quarters of EU ecosystems are currently exposed to more nitrogen deposition than they can cope with and nearly one-tenth is receiving too much acid fallout.

Sea levels could rise 1.3 to 2 metres by 2100

New studies have been published concluding that sea levels could rise far more rapidly than expected in coming decades.

Land is a crucially important sector to keep global warming below 1.5°C.

A quarter of human induced greenhouse gas emissions comes from agriculture, forestry and other land use.

Tougher air pollution targets needed

Revision of EU’s key legal instrument for improving air quality – the NEC directive – is currently the subject of intense negotiations.

Analysis of the implementation on the Paris Agreement

An analysis on how to translate the Paris agreement into action in a German context.

Stricter air pollution rules for machinery agreed

Emissions from non-road mobile machinery are a significant source of air pollution, especially nitrogen oxides and particulate matter.

Huge health impacts from Balkan coal plants

New study quantifies the public health costs of polluted air from existing coal-fired power plants in the Western Balkans at up to €8.5 billion per year.

More than half US population exposed to dangerous air pollution

A total of 166 million Americans live in areas that have unhealthy levels of either ozone or particle pollution, according to the American Lung Association.

Save lives and costs by cutting GHG

The greenhouse emission cuts that the United States of America agreed to at the Paris climate conference may come with a significant public health benefit.

Big benefits of cleaner marine fuel

Air quality in coastal areas improved significantly in 2015 after stricter sulphur limits for marine fuels were introduced in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea.

Baltic Sea and North Sea move towards becoming NOx Emission Control Areas

Significant health and environmental benefits will result from action to cut NOx emissions from international shipping.

Livestock holds major potential for GHG reductions

Policies targeting the livestock sector could potentially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 1.8 gigatons of CO2 equivalents per year.

Sweden and the climate change performance index

Sweden always scores well for climate policy on the annual scorecard of Climate Action Network Europe and Germanwatch. But for some years this has been more due to luck than to real progress.

Health and climate co-benefits of dietary change

Widespread adoption of a vegetarian diet would significantly cut food-related emissions of greenhouse gases and make people healthier too.

Germany sets its sights on coal phase-out

Coal must be phased-out for Germany to meet its ambitious climate protection goals.

Carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere spike

The annual growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide measured at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii jumped by 3.05 parts per million during 2015, the largest year-to-year increase in 56 years of research, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Editorial May 2016

"We need clean air"

Methane levels increase rapidly in the Arctic

“We see an alarming development,” says senior researcher Cathrine Lund Myhre at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU). 

Germany to exit coal power “well before 2050”

Reuters reported at the beginning of May 2016 that “according to a draft environment ministry document”, coal-fired power production in Germany.

Visit the Death Ticker

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) has published an online Death Ticker.

Finland: 1,600 early deaths every year due to air pollution

Air pollution is estimated to cause some 1,600 premature deaths in Finland every year, says a new report from the Environment Ministry.

UK air pollution is a public health emergency

According to a cross-party committee of Members of Parliament, air pollution in the UK is a “public health emergency” – the government’s own data shows air pollution causes 40,000–50,000 early deaths a year. 

IPCC starts work on the 1.5ºC target and 6th Assessment Report

The Paris Agreement of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change says that global temperature increase should be limited to 1.5ºC compared with pre-industrial times. 

Even “most efficient” coal puts global climate goals out of reach – report

WWF has published a new report that shows that even the most efficient coal plants are not compatible with the global climate change goal.

Babies harmed by air pollution

Air pollution in the United States may be causing thousands of premature births each year and costing the nation billions of dollars.

Fines of up to €12.7 million for breaching sulphur standard

Ireland has penalty systems in place that could see bunker suppliers and ships that are in breach of the MARPOL Annex VI sulphur regulations face fines of up to € 12.7 million.

Ship fuel non-compliance around 5% in 2015

Forty-three incidents of ships using non-compliant fuel were detected in EU sulphur emission control areas (SECAs) in 2015

Football players' performance affected by air pollution

 A group of health economists has found that football players’ performance was impeded at levels of particulate matter (PM) well below the EU air quality limits. 

Shipper fined US$ 130,000 for violating sulphur regulation

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has fined the China Navigation Co. Pte. Ltd. US$ 129,500