Nuclear power is dirty and expensive. Instead military interests is the drivng force behind new constructions. Photo: / Blake Burkhart CC BY

Nuclear power should not be part of climate-friendly energy mix

The debate on effective climate protection is heating up in Germany and the rest of the world. Nuclear energy is being touted as “clean” energy. Given the circumstances, a recent study has analysed the historical, current, and future costs and risks of nuclear energy. The findings show that nuclear energy can by no means be called “clean” due to radioactive emissions, which will endanger humans and the natural environment for over one million years. It also carries a high risk of proliferation. An empirical survey of the 674 nuclear power plants that have ever been built showed that private economic motives never played a role. Instead military interests have always been the driving force behind their construction. Even ignoring the expense of dismantling nuclear power plants and the long-term storage of nuclear waste, purely economic private investment in nuclear power plant would result in high losses – an average of five billion euros per nuclear power plant, as one financial simulation revealed. In countries such as China and Russia, where nuclear power plants are still being built, private investment does not play a role either. Nuclear power is too expensive and dangerous, so it should not be part of the climate-friendly energy mix of the future.

Source: Abstract by German Institute for Economic Research


In this issue