Illustration: © Lars-Erik Håkansson

Member states to set the bottom floor

The climate and environment are central objectives in the new CAP proposal, but more flexibility for member states risks undermining delivery on the ground.

On 1 June the Commission presented their proposal for a Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 2021–2027. The agricultural commissioner Phil Hogan presented it as “delivering genuine subsidiarity for member states; ensuring a more resilient agricultural sector in Europe; and increasing the environmental and climate ambition of the policy”.

Environmental organisations responded with criticism. Bérénice Dupeux from EEB said that the “proposal remains an empty shell, with payments neither linked to environmentally friendly farm methods or actual environmental improvements”. Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director Marco Contiero commented along the same lines, “the Commission’s plans offer almost no protection for health, the environment and climate”.

So, what is behind Hogan’s claim of higher ambitions for the climate and environment?

First, the striking theme of the new proposal is increased flexibility for member states. Member states are expected to present their own Strategic CAP Plans with various components from a loose framework (see AN2/18). This offers an opportunity for member states that wish to increase their environmental ambition to do so. However, it also means that member states that do not have the environment particularly high on their agenda can design a national CAP with quite low environmental ambitions. How low the bottom floor is in the proposal is difficult to determine; this will be decided to quite a degree by the interpretation of details and how strict the Commission will be in their review of the national plans.

The green architecture of the proposed CAP consists of three building blocks: enhanced conditionality in pillar I, eco schemes in pillar I and climate/environmental schemes in pillar II. All three are compulsory for member states, but only the first one is compulsory for farmers.

The enhanced conditionality is what was previously called cross-compliance and sets minimum standards that all farms that receive direct payments under pillar I must comply with. The word “enhanced” refers to five new Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAECs). Three of these can easily be related to the practices included in the scrapped greening mechanism: GAEC 1 – maintenance of permanent pasture, GAEC 8 – crop rotation (to replace crop diversification), and GAEC 9 – maintenance of non-productive areas (to replace Ecological Focus Areas).
The other change is the addition of new requirements: GAEC 2 – to protect carbon-rich soils, GAEC 5 – to make compulsory the use of the new Farm Sustainability Tool for Nutrients, and GAEC 10 – a ban on converting grassland in Natura 2000 sites. GAEC 5 means that the need to have a nutrient management plan is extended to all agricultural land, not just land in Nitrate Vulnerable Zones, as is currently the case.

What environmental benefits these new requirements will entail depends on how they are more precisely defined by the member states. Previous evaluations of the cross-compliance mechanism have shown that interpretations into national standards can be very lax.

Eco-schemes are a new structure under pillar I. They are obligatory for member states, but they are not ring-fenced by provisions such as a minimum level of funding. According to the Commission they “will have to address the CAP environment and climate objectives in ways that complement the other relevant tools available and go beyond what is already requested under the conditionality requirements”. They could either be payments by hectare, as a bonus to the direct payments or as compensation for single implementations. The types of measures that are expected to occur under this scheme are similar to what have previously been seen under the Rural Development Programmes in pillar II. Important differences are however that the level must not be related to the cost for the farmer to carry them out (at least if they are area payments) and they will not need to be co-financed by the member states like the pillar II schemes.

Agri-environmental-climate measures (AECMs) will still be around as an obligatory element of the member states’ Rural Development programme under pillar II. One concern is that the money for Pillar II will decrease during the next CAP period and of course threaten the funds allocated to AECMs. However, if member states wish to be ambitious the Commission offers several solutions in their proposal. As with the present CAP it is possible for member states to move 15 per cent of the funding from one pillar to the other. In addition to this they are allowed to move an extra 15 per cent from pillar I to pillar II for interventions that address environmental and climate objectives. They can also top up pillar II with their own funding. Another option is to increase their co-funding of pillar II.  

For member states less concerned with the environment the Commission has designed three mechanisms to safeguard a lowest level of ambition: a minimum of 40 per cent spending on climate under the CAP, a minimum of 30 per cent spending on AECMs under pillar II and a no-backsliding requirement.

The 40 per cent spending on climate action can be seen as a bookkeeping exercise, where “climate action” is interpreted broadly and weighted accordingly:

  • 40% of the area payments under pillar I (since they are under conditionality)
  • 100% for expenditure under eco-schemes
  • 100% for expenditure for AECMs
  • 40% for expenditure for natural or other area-specific constraints.

This could put some constraints on member states that want to prioritise coupled payments under pillar I and investment support under pillar II.

A requirement for a minimum of 30 per cent spending on AECMs under pillar II exists in the present CAP. What is new in the proposal is that expenditure on areas of natural constraints and areas with other specific constraints is no longer included. This should protect the present funding for environmental measures even if pillar II has shrunk.

Finally, there is article 92 in the Strategic Plan, which says that member states “shall aim to make … a greater overall contribution to the achievement of the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives” and they should explain in their strategic plans “how they intend to achieve the greater overall contribution” to those objectives.

The weakness of this phrasing is that member states only “shall aim”, while the term “contribution”, as explained by DG Agri officials, does not refer to monetary amounts or expenditure. The value of this article, if not strengthened, again depends on how strictly the Commission assesses the countries’ qualitative explanations.

Whether the proposal will be watered down or strengthened is now up to Council and the European Parliament. When the agricultural ministers met in mid-July they were more concerned that the “enhanced conditionality” would add to bureaucracy than they were about discussing its capacity to deliver environmental results on the ground.

Earlier in July the European Parliament appointed three rapporteurs. The ambition is to have a first reading before the European Union elections in May 2019. For the first time the Parliament’s environment committee has been given shared competence, as an “associated committee”, over the environmental content in the CAP.

Kajsa Pira

The content of this article is to a large extent based on two articles by Allan Mathews:
http://capreform.eu/the-greening-architecture-in-the-new-cap/
http://capreform.eu/the-article-92-commitment-to-increased-ambition-with...
The Commission’s press release, 1 June 2018:
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3985_en.htm

 

Illustration: © Lars-Erik Håkansson

Member states to set the bottom floor

The climate and environment are central objectives in the new CAP proposal, but more flexibility for member states risks undermining delivery on the ground.

Photo: National Renewable Energy Lab CC BY-NC-ND

Editorial: Just doing a little bit is not enough

“Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.” This is the main message of the IPCC report released on 8 October. They also conclude “that we ...

Six countries taken to court over air quality breaches

If EU countries do not urgently address their air pollution problems, the European Court of Justice can impose fines amounting to millions of euro.

Hungary is one of six countries referred to the European Court of Justice because their governments have not done enough to improve air quality. Photo: Flickr.com / Tea Meister CC BY
A full implementation of the NEC directive requirements would reduce premature deaths bt 200,000 annually by 2030. Photo: Flickr.com / Eduardo A. Ponce CC BY-NC-ND

EU “Clean Air Outlook” up to 2030

The annual benefits of additional measures needed to achieve the 2030 national emissions ceilings are estimated at €13–58 billion, up to 84 times higher than the estimated costs.

Photo: Flickr.com / Andrew CC BY

Coal will be squeezed out by renewables

Prices of green electricity and batteries have fallen so sharply that projections for 85–90% renewables by 2035 look “ludicrously conservative”, according to the energy coalition ETC.

Lessons from aviation’s first foray into market-based measures

International Civil Aviation Organization landed on the cheapest, most contentious, and finally outdated policy instrument out there – offsetting.

Photo: © Shutterstock – Arseniy Shemyakin Photo
Illustrations: © Shutterstock – PytY and © Shutterstock – Alzbeta

Europe still building new coal power stations

Several countries in Europe have recently built or are planning to build new coal power stations. Some examples from Germany were described in the last issue of Acid News (AN2/2018), and further examples of such plants from Eastern Europe are presented here.

Photo: Flickr.com / Junep A CC BY

Germany must exit coal quickly

A study conducted by the Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology posits that Germany can still meet its 2020 emissions reduction target.

Swedes harmed by air pollution

Every year 7600 people in Sweden die prematurely due to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter, with an annual cost to society of at least 5.3 billion euro.

Photo: Flickr.com / Stefan Leijon CC BY-ND
Photo: Ammonia emissions increased in fifteen member states. Photo: Flickr.com / Andrew CC BY

Agricultural ammonia emissions keep on rising

Five EU countries breached their national emission ceilings for ammonia in 2016 and total emissions have now increased by two per cent over three years, preliminary data from the European Environment Agency (EEA) shows.

Patterns: © Shutterstock – Graham Corney, © Shutterstock – eNjoy iStyle, © Shutterstock – jeagun lee

Three easy apples to pick

Some types of change require long-term planning, new institutions, educating a new generation etc. Other things are so easy to do that they should have been implemented yesterday.

Wind farms and birds

Wind farms are far less harmful to birds than first thought, according to the biggest ever study on the subject published in April, because seabirds actively change their flight paths to avoid them.

Photo: Flickr.com /Steve P2008 CC BY
Photo: Flickr.com / Duncan Rawlinson CC BY-NC-ND

A smorgasbord of sustainable solutions

Environmentally aware public procurement and the inclusion of sustainability in dietary guidelines are some measures already taken in the transition towards a sustainable food system.

Värtaverket in Stockholm, the last coal-fired heating plant in Sweden. Photo: Flickr.com / Arvid Rudling CC BY-SA

Sweden to stop using coal for energy in 2022

The burning of coal for heat and power in Sweden will stop in 2022, which is the deadline for the combined heat and power plant in Stockholm.

Solar radiation management (SRM) and geoengineering are not needed

SRM is perilous, as the consequnces of intervening in a highly complex system are unpredictable. Actual GHG emissions cuts can achieve more, faster, surer, cheaper and without the risk.

Photo: Flickr.com/Bruno Caimi CC BY
Photo: © Shutterstock – durantelallera

Cruise ship ranking

In its updated cruise ship ranking, German environmentalist organisation NABU (Nature And Biodiversity Conservation Union) concludes that just one newly built cruise ship, the AIDAnova, renounces the use ...

One of the electrified harbour buses that soon will be in traffic in the Danish capital. Photo: Damen.com

Five fully-electric ferries in Copenhagen

The multinational public transport company Arriva Danmark has recently contracted Damen Shipyards Group for five fully-electric ferries, to be operated for the Danish public transport agency MOVIA, in Copenhagen ...

Photo: Flickr.com / Thor CC BY

LNG wrong course

Switching to liquefied natural gas (LNG) is a costly and ineffective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from shipping, according to a new study commissioned by Transport & Environment. While LNG ...

Photo: Flickr.com / Tom CC BY-ND

Norway heading for zero-emission ships

Norway has set its sights on creating the world’s first zero emissions control area (ZECA). A resolution adopted by the Norwegian Parliament on 3 May seeks to halt emissions from cruise ships and ferries in the Norwegian ...

Hiding? No I am just adjusting this wall. Photo: © Shutterstock – Arman Novic

Member states ask EU to help hide their air pollution failure

Eleven governments have asked the European Commission to retrospectively raise their “emission ceilings” after breaching their national air pollution limits in 2016, namely: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland ...

Court ruling demands ban on older diesel cars by February. Photo: Flickr.com / Volker Kannacher CC BY-ND-SA

Frankfurt must ban older diesel cars

Frankfurt must ban highly-polluting, older diesel vehicles from the city centre from February 2019 as part of a plan to improve air quality, the Administrative Court in Wiesbaden ruled on 5 September. ClientEarth lawyer ...

Photo: © Shutterstock – Kiszon Pascal

Diesel cars cause high health costs

Recent research by scientists at the University of Oxford and University of Bath suggests that the health damage effects associated with diesel vehicle emissions are around 20 times greater than electric vehicles ...

Photo: © Shutterstock – aydngvn

Support for renewables over coal in Turkish poll

While Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan has strongly promoted new coal power plants, only 5.2 per cent of 2595 residents surveyed preferred coal power, compared to 70 per cent support for solar and 52.8 per cent support ...

Photo: Flickr.com / Collierwilson CC BY-NC-ND

EU livestock numbers are too high

“What is the Safe Operating Space for EU livestock?” is the question at issue and the title of a new report from the Rise Foundation. Their preliminary analysis shows that the numbers of farm animals in Europe ...

You know the feeling when small countries end up being underwater and they tell you to rewrite your national climate plan. Photo: © Shutterstock – Kjetil Kolbjornsrud

Climate-vulnerable countries: 2015 commitments are outdated

The Climate Vulnerable Forum (CVF) has urged countries to step up and revise their national climate plans without further delay. “Growing climate risks, economic and technological developments in low-carbon technology" ...

Report suggests sales restrictions. Photo: © Shutterstock – Casey Bollig

No more sales of wet firewood in the UK

Retailers could face restrictions on selling wet wood as a fuel for household heating, under plans announced by the UK government on 17 August to tackle particulate (PM) air pollution, following on from the launch of the government’s Clean Air Strategy this summer.

Photo: © Shutterstock – bhathaway

Zero-emission construction machinery

Construction sites are the source of various forms of pollution, such as material waste, visible dust, noise, and vibration. But they also produce air pollution, especially nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM).

In brief

London ULEZ to expand from October 2021

London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone will expand out to the North and South Circular roads from 25 October 2021 and cover an area 18 times larger than the Central London ULEZ, the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, confirmed on 8 June.

The ULEZ is to be introduced in the centre of the city from early 2019, before expanding out to the North and South Circulars in 2021 – and will increase the emissions standards for vehicles operating in the capital. Replacing the current T-Charge, the ULEZ would see vehicles that do not meet emission standards liable to incur a daily charge to drive within the zone, ranging from £12.50 for some light vehicles, up to an additional £100 for some heavy goods vehicles which do not meet the Euro VI emissions limit.

Source: AirQualityNews, 8 June 2018.

Denmark to ban new fossil fuel cars by 2035

The Danish government has launched a climate and air pollution package called “together for a cleaner world”, which includes 38 initiatives. The country aims to ban sales of petrol and diesel cars by 2030 and sales of plug-in hybrids by 2035. This should be enough to achieve a fossil-free car fleet by 2050. This would reduce annual CO2 emissions by 7 million tonnes. They also intend to set up a scrapping premium for diesel cars.

Besides transport measures, the package also includes initiatives to promote precision farming with the ambition to reduce ammonia emissions, and improved monitoring of sulphur emissions from the shipping sector.

Source: ENDS Daily 9 October 2018

Sweden will fine high-sulphur ships

After years of preparatory work, the Swedish government has now finally introduced economic sanctions on ships using illegal high-sulphur fuel. The minimum penalty fee is SEK 5,000 (€482) and the maximum SEK 500,000 (€48,200). The higher the engine power and the fuel sulphur content, the higher the penalty. If a company continues to violate the rules the fee can be doubled, potentially reaching SEK 1 million.

As from 1 January 2015, EU legislation as well as rules set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) require ships to use fuels with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.1 per cent when entering the North Sea and Baltic Sea, which are designated as sulphur emission control areas. In comparison, the sulphur standard for most of the rest of world is currently 3.5 per cent, but will come down to 0.5 per cent as from 2020.

Source: Press release from the Swedish Ministry of Environment, 1 June 2018

Copenhagen mayor wants to ban wood-burning stoves

Copenhagen Mayor Frank Jensen wants to reduce air pollution by banning new wood-burning stoves and offering householders a cash incentive to scrap their old stoves and switch to district heating. Jensen would like to see the cash incentive funded by the state, but if it is unwilling to do so, Copenhagen Municipality is seeking permission to set up a local scrappage scheme.

“In a city where we’ve got district heating in every house there’s no need for wood-burning stoves as a heat source. They are only for ‘hygge’ (cosiness) and that kind of ‘hygge’ is something we will have to wean ourselves off,” he said.

There are more than 16,000 wood-burning stoves in Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, and one study has estimated that 77 premature deaths in 2014 could be directly attributed to particle emissions from wood-burning stoves.

Source: chppost.dk, 30 August 2018
http://cphpost.dk/news/nature-news-in-brief-mayor-wants-to-rid-copenhage...