Industry does not need CCS

Using wood instead of concrete reduces CO₂ emissions. Fotolia.com © Michael Flippo

Swedish steel group SSAB, the country’s top CO₂ emitter, foregoes CCS. It opts to replace coal with hydrogen. The cement industry and refineries also show low-CO₂ potential soon, and without CCS.

If R&D efforts are successful they may be replicated all over the world, and pay part of the cost for the introduction of hydrogen as transport fuel.

Blast furnaces produce large amount of CO₂, since coal is used to reduce iron oxides to iron.

So far, the approach to producing CO₂-free steel has been dominated by CCS in combination with improved fuel efficiency, at least in Europe, as manifested in the Ulcos/Hisarna1 project in the Netherlands.

CCS has also dominated the Swedish approach to CO₂ reduction in all heavy industry. The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise was very clear about this in May 2015 at a seminar about carbon cuts2. Nothing was, however, mentioned about costs and who is supposed to pay.

Swedish steel group SSAB, the country’s top CO₂ emitter, foregoes CCS. It opts to replace coal with hydrogen.

But in April 2016, SSAB announced3 that they together with miner LKAB and power producer Vattenfall were launching an R&D effort to use hydrogen as a reductant, hoping to achieve zero carbon, and using direct reduction or iron sponge technology.

Hydrogen is a very clean fuel and can be zero carbon if produced by electrolysis from zero-carbon electricity. This is technically possible anywhere in the world. In Sweden, the prospect of very low carbon power is not that distant.

Electricity in Sweden is produced mainly from hydro, nuclear, wind and biomass. So the CO2 emissions are low now, and can stay low when nuclear power is phased out. Vattenfall, SSAB and LKAB expect it to be replaced with more renewables.

SSAB emitted 21 per cent of Sweden’s ETS emissions in 2015. Another three per cent came from LKAB mining, mainly from sintering/pelleting of iron ore.

Neither company has elaborated, but an obvious factor is that SSAB and LKAB believe that after Paris, “coal forever” is no longer an option, while CCS is not making much headway. Another factor is that power prices are low and are expected to stay low.

With an increasing share of renewables, power prices are expected to fluctuate more: higher when there is little wind and lower when it is windy. In Germany and Denmark there are sometimes even negative prices, which is not viable.

This is a problem hydrogen/iron can actually help to solve. With some flexibility in either iron production or some storage of hydrogen, use of electricity at peak price can be avoided for perhaps several hundreds of hours per year. This would lower its cost considerably, for a small loss in production.

That way SSAB and LKAB would act as virtual power plants, so real peak power plants will not be needed even with much more wind power.

The time perspective4 is early 2030s, i.e. 15–18 years.

This is at least as fast as CCS. According to the IEA, as of 2013, CCS for huge blast furnaces “will not be available before 2030–40”5.

Both technology choices involve technical and economic risks, and the demonstration phase needs public support. But hydrogen solves the CO₂ problem for good.

Even if CCS could operate earlier than hydrogen it would involve huge costs being written off over just a few years. To go for both would mean paying twice.

One reason why hydrogen may be faster is that blast furnaces have to be made very large to make economic sense. Direct reduction iron plants exist today, with natural gas as fuel. They can be made smaller and also more flexible to operate.

Blast furnaces also have to run continuously, so carbon capture must not stop them at any time. This calls for very careful planning, tight schedules for installing the huge parts, and clarification of all the legal details regarding responsibilities, guarantees, indemnification etc., or the plant owner cannot take the risk.

Sweden has the wrong geology for CO₂ storage, so long pipelines to Norway or the Baltic Sea may have to be built from the two furnaces, which are 1,000 km apart.

Another huge global problem, for which CCS has been touted as the only solution, is cement production. But other ways to reduce emissions have recently appeared, again in Sweden.

CO₂ is released when quicklime (CaO) is produced from limestone (CaCO₃), and accounted for almost six per cent of global CO₂ emissions⁶ in 2013. On top of that fossil fuels are used for heating the lime in kilns.

Riksbyggen is a cooperative developer and manager of apartment blocks. The company has set a number of green requirements for an apartment block to be built in Gothenburg soon, and claims to be able to reduce the carbon footprint for the concrete framework by 30–35 per cent compared to standard concrete. They are doing so in cooperation with Cementa (part of Heidelberg Cement), mainly by changing the recipe for the cement, by decreasing the share of quicklime and increasing the share of fly ash.

Another Swedish company, Thomas Concrete Group, has started marketing products with 30 per cent fly ash, as a substitute for Portland cement.

Fly ash is produced in large quantities at coal power stations, also from biopower. So far much of it has been used as landfill, which is becoming more difficult in countries such as the US and India. There are also huge amounts of similar ash of volcanic origin. Another cement substitute is slag from steel production. Neither emits CO₂.

In Sweden, wood is often used as an alternative to concrete, sometimes combined with magnesium oxide, for example in making boards.

If construction companies demand greener building materials and methods, as they sometimes⁷ do, they can start a chain reaction in the market. Low environmental impact is an important competitive factor, as many customers want their buildings to be certified as LEED Platinum or Gold, where low-CO₂ concrete can earn points8.

There is a discernible market dynamic, perhaps even without government intervention, but certainly with it.

Refineries are also big point sources of CO₂. These emissions can be tackled in at least three other ways than CCS. A higher share of biofuels means less emissions from vehicles and from refineries. This has happened in Sweden to some extent, especially for diesel-from-wood.

Hydrogen is used in large quantities in refineries, but is now of fossil origin. The biggest refiner in Sweden, Preem, is investigating the production of “green hydrogen”9.

Finally, if electric cars and hydrogen cars, and biofuels such as methane, ethanol, and methanol take more market share, oil refineries can be phased out.

Fredrik Lundberg

1 www.ulcos.org/en/research/isarna.php
2 www.svensktnaringsliv.se/fragor/miljo-energi-klimat/basindustrin-siktar-... (in Swedish)
3 www.ssab.com/GlobalData/News-Center/2016/04/04/05/32/SSAB-LKAB-and-Vatte...
4 http://news.vattenfall.com/en/article/renewable-electricity-and-hydrogen...
5 http://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/IEAGHG_Presentations/S._Santos_-_Gra...
6 http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global.1751_2013.ems
7 http://www.skanska.co.uk/services/cementation-piling-and-foundations/sus...
8 http://flyash.com/data/upfiles/resource/TB%2028%20Fly%20Ash%20in%20LEED%...
9 https://preem.se/framtiden (in Swedish)

In this issue

IMO confirms 2020 date

Implementing the global rule to restrict the sulphur content in marine fuel oil to 0.5 per cent will cut shipping SO2 emissions by nearly 80 per cent and prevent more than 100,000 annual premature deaths.

Editorial: Global sulphur cap in 2020

It is now finally settled that the global cap of 0.5 per cent for the sulphur content of the fuel oil used by ships will apply from 1 January 2020.

End derogations for polluting coal plants

Effective regulation of air pollutant emissions from coal-fired power plants could prevent 20,000 premature deaths every year.

A Europe powered only with renewable energy

This vision was launched in 1992 from within the world-leading power equipment company ABB.

Small is beautiful

“Small is beautiful” was the catchphrase of the alternative energy movement of the 1970s.

Initiative to boost soil carbon

In Paris an initiative called “4 per 1000” was signed by 25 countries, with the aim to protect and increase carbon stocks in soil and to develop accounting and safeguard criteria.

Multiple actions needed to reduce food emissions

Reducing consumption of meat, dairy and eggs by three quarters in the EU will lead to reductions of 44 per cent in greenhouse gas emissions from the food sector, but other efforts are also needed to reach a 2-degree target.

Climate target for agriculture

A new study proposes that the agricultural sector needs to reduce emissions by 1 billion tonnes of CO₂e per year by 2030 to contribute to the 2°C target.

Air pollution costs trillions

Premature deaths due to air pollution cause annual global costs of about US$225 billion in lost work days, and more than US$5 trillion in welfare losses, according to a new study.

Germany’s slow decarbonisation

Germany must still eliminate 145 Mt of annual greenhouse gas emissions to achieve its 2020 climate target, 16 per cent below current levels.

Proposed gas strategy is a gamble with the climate

The EU, Norway and Russia are all promoting fossil gas as a long-term clean and sustainable energy solution. “There’s no such thing as clean gas”, says Friends of the Earth Europe.

Phasing out fossil fuel power is essential

The EU should seize the opportunity to replace ageing and end-of-life coal-fired plants with renewable energy sources.

Unique oppurtunity for Ukraine

The changed geopolitical situation in Ukraine has led to an energy crisis, and the country is now at a crossroads: sticking with coal and nuclear power or investing in renewables?

Greening transport with more electric vehicles

A large scale roll-out of electric cars on EU roads would result in significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions and lower levels of certain air pollutants.

New diesel cars still emit up to 15 times too much NOx

Over four in five Euro 5 diesel cars produce more than three times their laboratory limit value for NOx when driven on the road, and two-thirds of Euro 6 diesel cars still emit more than three times their limit.

European emission trends updated

Overall air pollutant emissions keep on slowly shrinking – sulphur emissions show the biggest reductions, while there is much less improvement for ammonia and particulate matter.