Higher ambitions needed for NEC

Illustration: © Lars-Erik Håkansson

National emission reduction commitments for 2030 should ensure achievement of the World Health Organization’s recommended air quality levels.

A coalition of environmental groups has summarised their main concerns about the proposed revision of the EU’s National Emissions Ceilings (NEC) directive, and provided inputs to the ongoing decision-making process in the European Parliament and the Council.

Every year, over 400,000 Europeans die prematurely because of air pollution. Poor air quality also makes Europeans sick and significantly reduces their quality of life, in particular in cities. Increased illness, hospital admissions, extra medication and millions of lost working days are very costly for the European Union – the health-related costs of air pollution amounted to €330–940 billion in the year 2010 alone, which is equivalent to between 3 and 9 per cent of the EU’s GDP. This includes €15 billion in direct costs from lost workdays and €4 billion from treatments of chronic bronchitis. Air pollution also causes great harm to Europe’s ecosystems, crop yields, buildings and monuments.

Numerous studies have systematically demonstrated that the benefits of taking action to cut emissions of air pollutants outweigh the costs, in most cases by large margins.

Although environmental groups welcomed the Commission’s proposal from December 2013 to revise the National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive, they conclude that its ambition level does not match the scale of Europe’s air quality problems and the benefits at stake. Some of the main points of criticism are that:

  • The targets, known as “Emission Reduction Commitments” (ERCs), set for 2020 have been copy-pasted from the 2012 revised Gothenburg Protocol without consideration of the potential for additional health and environmental benefits for the EU of higher ambition levels. These proposed ERCs are expected to be achieved by member states, in many cases by a wide margin, just by implementing existing legislation. In some cases, the proposed ERCs would even result in higher emissions in 2020 than are allowed under the old NEC Directive dating from 2010.
  • The Commission’s proposal does not set legally binding reductions for 2025, thus risking the delay of urgently needed action until 2030.
  • The proposed ERCs for 2030 are clearly not sufficient to achieve the World Health Organization’s recommended levels of air quality, which are equivalent to the EU’s long-term air quality objective as set out in the 7th Environmental Action Programme. Even after implementing the proposed 2030 ERCs, air pollution would still cause some 260,000 premature deaths every year, i.e. more than half of today’s death toll would still remain. Large areas of sensitive ecosystems would still be exposed to excessive inputs of acidifying and eutrophying air pollutants.

The European Parliament’s Rapporteur, British Conservative MEP Julie Girling, published her draft report in late March, saying that “the NEC Directive is Europe’s overarching framework piece of legislation for air quality, and without effective and implementable source legislation, member states will never meet their emission reduction targets. In other words, a further tightening of air quality standards will be redundant unless we see a clear reduction in pollution from the main sources”.

Her report recommends improvements with regard to some aspects of the Commission’s proposal, in particular the 2025 emission reduction commitments, which she proposes to make mandatory for four out of the six pollutants.

Environmental groups also welcomed her proposals to require member states to monitor the impacts of air pollution; to strengthen the role of both the Commission and the public in scrutinising national air pollution control programmes; to improve coherence between the NEC directive and the ambient air quality directive, as well as with source emission legislation; and to remove the proposed shipping flexibility.

It was noted with criticism, however, that she missed the opportunity to improve the proposal’s ambition level for 2020, 2025 and 2030, especially considering that since the Commission published its proposal nearly one and half years ago, there are new studies and developments that further strengthen the case for more ambitious air pollution reductions.

For example, recent adjustments to national emission inventories and projections by member states show more optimistic developments in air pollutant emissions in comparison with the Commission’s previous calculations (see AN 1/15, p 22). This means that more ambitious ERCs and higher benefits could be achieved for the same initial cost.

Moreover, the European Parliamentary Research Service’s impact assessment report demonstrates that more ambition is possible and can be achieved at the same or lower cost (see AN 4/14, p 18–19). It shows that reduced consumption of polluting fuels under the EU’s new climate and energy policy agreed by the EU Council last October would decrease the need and costs for air pollution controls and make further air quality improvements significantly cheaper.

In light of the significant health, environmental and economic benefits that would result from a more ambitious NEC Directive, the environmental groups call upon the European Parliament and the Council to support:

  • Significantly stricter ERCs for 2025 and 2030. The ambition level should ensure the achievement of WHO’s recommended air quality levels by 2030.
  • Stricter ERCs for 2020, based on the most recent baseline figures and on a linear pathway towards the achievement of the 2025 and 2030 levels.
  • Legally binding ERCs for 2025 for all pollutants covered by the directive.
  • Legally binding ERCs for methane and mercury for all three target years, 2020, 2025 and 2030. (Mercury is left out of the Commission’s proposal despite being a toxic and highly transboundary pollutant causing great damage to health and ecosystems.)
  • The rejection of flexibilities such as adjustment of emission inventories and offsetting of emissions between land and sea.

On 15 June, environment ministers will discuss the directive in Brussels. A vote in the Parliament’s environment committee is scheduled for 15 July, with a plenary vote in September.

Christer Ågren

Source: “NGO recommendations on the revision of the NEC directive following the publication of the rapporteur’s draft report” (13 April 2015). By the European Environmental Bureau, Transport & Environment, ClientEarth, Health and Environment Alliance and AirClim.

 

Higher ambitions needed for NEC

National emission reduction commitments for 2030 should ensure achievement of the World Health Organization’s recommended air quality levels.

Editorial: New NEC directive should clear the air

The proposed revision of the National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive is currently being debated in the Council and in the European Parliament. While there is wide agreement on the urgency ..

Cities’ air quality efforts ranked

Zurich topped a new ranking list of European cities based on efforts to improve air quality. It was followed by Copenhagen, Vienna and Stockholm. At the bottom of the list came Luxembourg and Lisbon.

France: 100% renewables as cheap as 50% nuclear

The findings of a new report show that renewables can entirely cover French electricity needs by 2050 instead of a mix of nuclear, renewables and fossil fuels, which currently is the government plan.

Biogas solutions for methane abatement

Four Nordic projects for anaerobic digestion of manure show the potential for this methane abatement technique under varying conditions.

Danish farming futures

Becoming independent from fossil fuels by investing fully in the new bio economy, or reintroducing wolves and the European bison, these are two visions explored in a new report about the future of Danish farming.

Marshall Islands calls for cuts in shipping emissions

By 2050, greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping are expected to increase by up to 250 per cent, equivalent to between 6 and 14 per cent of total global emissions.

Offsetting of shipping NOx cuts?

Emission control areas in the Baltic Sea and North Sea will cut NOx from shipping, but would make only a very limited contribution to member states’ NOx emission reduction targets for 2030.

Ship scrubbers questioned

The ecological risks to the marine environment of using sulphur scrubbers are ignored, while the economic benefits have been overestimated, says German environmental organisation NABU.

New ships less fuel efficient than those built in 1990

Ships are significantly less energy-efficient today than in 1990, calling for greater steps in regulation and binding energy efficiency standards for the shipping sector.

New draft EU air pollution limits weaker than in China

The EU is currently in the process of defining new emission limits for coal-fired power stations, but the draft new standards are in many cases weaker than existing national standards not only in Europe but also in China, Japan and the United States.

 

Shipping monitoring will contribute to CO2 targets

The newly adopted EU Monitoring Reporting and Verification (MRV) regulation that requires ship operators to publicly report information on the environmental performance of ships is expected to contribute to a decrease in shipping sector CO2 emissions.

Sweden without gas

Natural gas is not a necessary part of the fuel mix. Most of Sweden, including Stockholm, has no natural gas. The combined pressure of environmental NGOs and farmers stopped gas and led to the development of biomass instead.

Potential for shore-side electricity

Connecting ships at berth to onshore power will provide health and environmental benefits by reducing air pollution, greenhouse gases and noise.

Ozone pollution still high

Air pollution by ground-level ozone continued to affect many countries across Europe during summer 2014, according to a new briefing published by the European Environment Agency (EEA).

Serious flaws in new MCP directive

On 6 May the European Parliament’s environment committee voted on the introduction of new air pollution limits for medium-size combustion plants (MCP).

UN climate chief says there is “no space” for new coal

On 7 May Christina Figueres, the UN climate chief, met with representatives from seven Australian governments to encourage the states and territories ..

Longannet power plant to shut next year

The giant coal-fired power station, Longannet, on the Firth of Forth in Scotland, UK, is to close by March 2016. Built in 1973 and now inefficient, Longannet ..

NRMM emission standard needs to be strengthen

In a recent policy briefing, the green group Transport & Environment (T&E) criticises the Commission’s proposal to revise the Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) directive.

France told to act on PM10 and marine fuels

The maximum daily limits for PM10 are being exceeded in ten zones in France: Paris, Lyon, Grenoble, Marseille, Martinique, Rhône-Alpes–ZUR (Vallée de l’Arve), PACA–ZUR (Zone Urbaine Régionale) ..

Court orders UK to act on air pollution

The UK Supreme Court has quashed the country’s ineffective plans to cut illegal levels of air pollution in Britain and ordered it to deliver new plans by the end of the year.

Member states fail to define low-energy buildings

Only half of EU member states have in law defined nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (nZEB) requirements for new buildings, according to a survey by the Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE).

Fossil fuels subsidised by $10 million a minute

Fossil fuel companies are benefitting from global subsidies of US$5.3 trillion a year, equivalent to $10 million a minute every day, according to a startling new estimate by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Make your voice heard on EU climate policy

The European Commission has launched two consultations concerning the future of the Effort Sharing Decision (ESD).

Efficiency standards for ships too easy to meet

CE Delft has released a study, commissioned by Brussels-based NGOs Seas at Risk and Transport & Environment, which calculated the Estimated Index Values ..

Mass action against coal mining

On 25 April more than 6,000 people formed a human chain close to the Garzweiler coal mine in Germany’s Rhineland.  The message was to “to end coal ..

Coal costs Turkey €3.6 billion a year

Coal power generation makes a considerable contribution to the country’s already huge air pollution problem. More than 97% of the urban population ..

4 out of 5 largest EU CO2 emitters are German

In 2014, RWE’s Weisweiler lignite power station replaced the UK’s Drax power station as Europe’s fifth largest CO2 emitter. This means for the first time since the EU Emission Trading Scheme ..

New test for diesel cars

Member states have agreed on the first “on the road” NOx emission test for diesel cars.  The limit of 80 milligrams of nitrogen oxides per km for diesel cars was agreed back in 2007.

Air pollution costs European economies US$ 1.6 trillion a year

A staggering US$ 1.6 trillion is the economic cost of the approximate 600,000 premature deaths and of the diseases caused by air pollution in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) European region in 2010.

Rooftop gardens could provide three-quarters of the vegetables for a city

In a study conducted in Bologna, researchers have estimated that more than 12,500 tonnes of vegetables could be produced if all the space on suitable rooftops ..

European coal and gas power on the way out

In a conference in mid-May organised in the run-up to the Paris climate negotiations in December 2015, gathering corporate executives from major power companies ..

Climate change threat to global coffee production

Suitable areas for growing Arabica coffee will shrink and move to higher elevations if temperatures rise by 2°C by 2050. Researchers have modelled changes in the local climate ..