Arsenic in air, cancer risks and background levels

Humans are exposed to inorganic arsenic in drinking water, soil and the air, and to organic arsenic compounds, especially in fish and shellfish. Arsenic occurs in the air bound to particles, mainly in the fine particle fraction, and consists almost exclusively of the more toxic form of inorganic arsenic (As III and As V).

Arsenic enters the air mainly due to smelters (of non-ferrous metals) and in the combustion of coal containing high arsenic levels (WHO, 2000). The reasons for regulating the concentrations of arsenic in ambient air are the effects that emissions to air can have on human health and the environment. Research on arsenic and lung cancer began in Sweden, where workers at Boliden Rönnskärsverket smelting plant were found to have a five times higher risk of dying from lung cancer.

Arsenic in ambient air is now a known carcinogenic (IARC Group I), after extensive research (IARC, 2012), and it has not been possible to establish a threshold for adverse effects on human health (WHO, 2000). If there does not seem to be a threshold value (i.e., a value below which no effect has been found with sufficient evidence), a so-called level of protection must instead be calculated with the accepted number of extra cancer cases in the event of lifelong exposure. Target levels can then be set, such as one extra cancer case per 100,000 or one million inhabitants in the event of lifelong exposure. The WHO has estimated that the lifetime excess risk of lung cancer is one per million at an airborne arsenic content of 0.7 (0.66) ng/m³ based on a traditional linear extrapolation from occupational studies (including Boliden Rönnskär) to low-dose exposure (WHO, 2000).

The US EPA uses the same approach as the WHO, but they only use domestic studies (their guidelines) and get a slightly higher risk estimate. This means that they set a lifetime excess risk of cancer of one per million at an airborne arsenic content of 0.2 ng/m³ (US EPA). In 2000, an EU expert group discussed if there might be an impact threshold (EC, 2000). In the presentation of results they concluding that there was no convincing evidence for an impact threshold, with other words there are no safe levels of Arsenic in air (EC, 2001). Following the publication of the EU position paper, further studies have shown lung cancer at arsenic exposures without any apparent threshold level (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2008). The European body ECHA (2013) has compiled calculations, the latest of which is from DECOS 2012. The Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety (DECOS) used the same methodology as the WHO but instead used the study that found the method to be of the highest quality and found that the lifetime risk of lung cancer is 1 per million at an air content of arsenic at 0.9 ng/m3 (ECHA, 2013).

To summarize, arsenic in the air is carcinogenic and the risk increases with dose and there does not seem to be evidence for threshold of effect according to the WHO (2000). Different expert bodies have calculated acceptable cancer risks, based on different samples of studies. The excess lifetime risk level is one per million inhabitants at a concentration of 0.2–0.9 ng/m³, while the the WHO assessment being 0.7ng/ m³. Unlike other countries, the EU does not have a defined acceptable risk, it is therefore a philosophical/political question about how many extra cancer cases to allow in society. Economically, lung cancer cases tend to be one of the most expensive outcomes, partly through medical costs, loss of work ability and partly through the suffering you are exposed to before you die.

Figure 1, Arsenic in PM10, Umweltbundesamt II 4.2 mit Daten der Messnetze der Länder und des Bundes.

Background concentrations in Europe have decreased over the past 20 years and are now mostly below 1 ng/m³ (EEA, 2023) (Figure 2). The statistics are in whole numbers and do not determine how much less than 1 ng/m³. As can be seen in Figure 1, with Germany as an example due to its large industrial sector, levels are well below 1 ng/m³ in most area with levels reaching 1.5 ng/m³ in industrial areas. Thus, the feasibility of reaching a health-based limit value seems good with little effort in most of the EU.

Ebba Malmqvist

Figure 2, Annual averages of arsenic in air 2018 (EEA, 2023)

References:

DECOS (2012) Arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds. Health-based calculated occupational cancer risk values. 2012; publication no. 2012/32.

EC (2000). Ambient Air Pollution by As, Cd and Ni compounds (Position Paper-Final). European Commission. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/pp_as_cd_ni.pdf

EC (2001) Scientific Questions to the CSTEE on Arsenic https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/op...

ECHA (2013) Final report for Arsenic Report number ECHA/2011/01 – SR-11

EEA (2023) Annual mean arsenic concentrations in 2018 https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/annual-mean-arsenic-conc... downloaded 2023-07-1

International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC (2012) vol. 100C: A review of human carcinogens

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Arsenic. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/subst/0278_summ...

WHO (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe; second edition No. 91.

Air pollution

In this issue

Low energy vision for the European region

The CLEVER scenario, a Collaborative Low Energy Vision for the European Region, is an energy transition scenario that follows a “sufficiency – efficiency – renewables” approach.

Editorial: EU climate target still not adapted to climate reality

On 8 September, the UN once again issued a report showing how governments are failing to take adequate action to implement the promises they made in the Paris Agreement. The so-called Synthesis Report on the Technical Dialogue from the First Global Stocktake showed how governments are good at making ambitious collective commitments but fail to take the right action at home to turn these collective pledges into a reality.

Denmark’s bold move to promote plant-based eating

The Danish government allocates around 11 million euros annually to a fund for plant-based foods. Its aim is to make plant-based diets accessible and appealing to everyone.

Peeking down from space to catch air pollution

When you think about satellites or NASA, you probably think about the universe, black holes, planets, and galaxies far away. But when NASA’s new project, MAIA, is launched in collaboration with the Italian Space Agency next year it will be pointed towards us on Mother Earth and the pollution we have created.

Arsenic in air, cancer risks and background levels

European Parliament votes on air quality

Although the Environment Committee had agreed on WHO alignment from the year 2030, a compromise proposal was presented to the European Parliament that aimed instead at 2035.

New steps towards banning high-carbon advertising

Last year hundreds of thousands of people signed up to support the idea of a ban on fossil fuel ads and sponsorships in the EU, such as the existing one on tobacco advertising.

Reviewed Gothenburg Protocol calls for revision

Under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) the Gothenburg Protocol has been reviewed in terms of effectiveness.

Unexpected CO₂ movements at pioneering Norwegian CCS sites

The CO₂ in the pioneering Norwegian CCS projects has moved in an unexpected way, says a recent IEEFA study. This raises questions about the feasibility and economy of large-scale CO₂ storage.

IED vote: EU Parliament rejects key proposals to curb emissions

MEPs agreed to improve emission reporting, but sided with the industry and farm lobby instead of taking action to protect citizens’ health and the environment.

Agrivoltaic solutions show positive performance in combating heatwaves

In the face of heatwaves and growing concerns about water scarcity, Sun'Agri, a French agrivoltaics specialist, has published insights on the positive impact of temperature regulation, water resource management and crop yields under agrivoltaic installations.

New Approaches to Offshore Wind Conflict Management

Effective ways to address conflicts are needed as the targets for the Baltic Sea offshore wind development are 22.5 GW by 2030, 34.6 GW by 2040, and 46.8 GW by 2050. At the moment, the Baltic Sea has 2.2 GW.

Shift to plant-based foods could halt forest reduction

A recent study has assessed the potential impacts of a global shift from livestock products to plant-based alternatives. The findings indicate that such a shift could have profound positive effects on the global food system and the environment.

Ambitious solar venture in Lithuania and Latvia

A Danish renewable energy company is set to construct a 65 MW solar facility in Anyksciai, Lithuania, with the capacity to provide clean energy for approximately 24,000 households.

Unlocking Europe’s building revolution

Buildings account for as much as 40 per cent of the EU’s overall energy consumption, with 75 per cent of these structures classified as inefficient.

Ocean carbon dioxide removal (OCDR) – high hopes for false solutions

Ocean Carbon Dioxide Removal (OCDR) is a range of strategies meant to remov carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere through leveraging the capacity of the oceans.

The importance and role of forests in Poland

A varity of forest types in Poland play an important role in the country's ecosystem and cultural heritage.

Poland is home to a variety of forest types, which cover an area of nearly 9.3 million hectares and account for 29.6% of the country’s total land area. These forests play an important role in the country’s ecosystem, economy and cultural heritage. The forests are dominated by coniferous species, which together cover 76.6% of the area. These include pine, larch, spruce and fir. Deciduous species appear on 23.4% of the area.

Main menu

Arsenic in air, cancer risks and background levels

In this issue

Low energy vision for the European region

Editorial: EU climate target still not adapted to climate reality

Denmark’s bold move to promote plant-based eating

Peeking down from space to catch air pollution

Arsenic in air, cancer risks and background levels

European Parliament votes on air quality

New steps towards banning high-carbon advertising

Reviewed Gothenburg Protocol calls for revision

Unexpected CO₂ movements at pioneering Norwegian CCS sites

IED vote: EU Parliament rejects key proposals to curb emissions

Agrivoltaic solutions show positive performance in combating heatwaves

New Approaches to Offshore Wind Conflict Management

Shift to plant-based foods could halt forest reduction

Ambitious solar venture in Lithuania and Latvia

Unlocking Europe’s building revolution

Ocean carbon dioxide removal (OCDR) – high hopes for false solutions

The importance and role of forests in Poland

Publications

Food for Thought

Northern forests, climate change and the UNFCCC

EU climate targets aligned with the Paris agreement’s 1.5°C objective

Baltic Sea Offshore Wind Collaborative-Learning project

Air pollution in Europe and children’s health

Climate Change: A Himalayan Odessey

No further discussion needed. The agreed global goal is to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C

Fossil-free electricity 2021

What we do

Air pollution

Climate Change

Policy initiatives

Do Your Bit!