Commission scrutinizes air quality derogations

The EU Commission has approved time extensions for 19 air quality zones, but raised objections to 75 other proposed exemptions.

On 2nd July the European Commission adopted nine decisions addressed to Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Slovakia, and Spain concerning temporary exemptions from the EU’s air quality standards for fine particles (PM₁₀).

According to EU’s air quality legislation, the PM₁₀ limit values should have been achieved in all member states by 2005, but the 2008 air quality directive (2008/50/EC) opens the way for member states, under strict conditions and for specific parts of the country, to extend the time for meeting the PM₁₀ limits until June 2011, subject to approval by the Commission.

Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said: “Air pollution from PM₁₀ has serious impacts on human health and compliance with the standards must be our priority. Several member states failed to comply with the deadline of 2005 for meeting the standards and are still not in compliance. The Commission therefore expects member states to clearly demonstrate that they are doing their utmost, in the interests of their citizens, to comply with the EU standards in the shortest possible time.”

In its decisions, the Commission approved time extensions until June 2011 for 19 air quality zones in Austria, Germany and Hungary, but raised objections to the other 75 proposed exemptions.

For those remaining 75 zones, the Commission considered that the conditions had not been met, in many cases because insufficient data had been provided or because the measures outlined in the air quality plans submitted do not demonstrate that the standards will be met at the end of the exemption period.

Member states have an opportunity to re-notify for zones where the Commission has raised objections if they provide new information to demonstrate fulfilment of the conditions.

The conditions for assessment of national notifications for time extensions can be summarised as follows:

All appropriate measures must have been taken before the initial attainment date to achieve compliance, i.e. before 2005 in the case of PM₁₀.
The cause of the exceedances must be due to one or more of the following factors: transboundary air pollution from other countries; adverse climatic conditions; or site-specific characteristics affecting how pollution is dispersed.
Compliance must be achieved by the expiry of the exemption period (June 2011 for PM₁₀). For each air quality zone an air quality plan must be prepared setting out the planned measures to ensure compliance.

Following notification from a member state, the Commission has nine months within which to raise objections, otherwise the exemption is deemed to have been approved. If objections are raised and the limit values continue to be exceeded, enforcement action will be taken.

In January 2009, infringement proceedings were launched against ten member states – Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Spain, and the UK – for failing to comply with PM₁₀ limit values.

In April 2009 the Netherlands was the first country to have a request for extensions approved by the Commission, which then agreed to an exemption from the PM₁₀ limit values in all Dutch air quality zones, as well as the postponement of the NO₂ limit values until 2015, except for one zone where the extension was set to apply until end 2012.

Decisions on derogation requests from eight countries – Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Portugal, and the UK – are expected from the Commission before the end of the year.

Christer Ågren

Note: EU air quality legislation sets binding limit values and/or indicative target values for the maximum permitted concentrations of certain air pollutants. There are two binding air quality limit values for particulate matter (PM₁₀) based on daily and annual average concentrations, respectively. These entered into force on 1 January 2005. The air quality directive 2008/50/EC entered into force in 2008 and allows member states to notify time extensions for PM₁₀, NO₂ and benzene. During the time extension period the limit values continue to apply plus a margin of tolerance. For more information: ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/legislation/time_extensions.htm

In this issue

High Noon for 2°C

The world’s nations agreed to “prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” (Art. 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change¹) back in 1992. Until recently, most nations had not agreed what that meant, however.

Pollution treaty to be revised

A revised Gothenburg protocol is expected to include new national emission ceilings for 2020.

Still high ozone levels despite less air pollution

Ozone levels remain largely unchanged in many European countries, even though emissions of the air pollutants involved in ozone formation have been reduced significantly.

Ministers water down pollution legislation

EU environment ministers have agreed to water down proposals for stronger industrial pollution control.

North American ECA met by approval

The process of establishing an emission control area (ECA) off the North American shores has taken a step further.

Shipping climate policy continues to drift

Once again, the IMO has failed to adopt binding measures to reduce emissions from international shipping.

Cutting ship fuel sulphur may save 45,000 lives

Lowering the sulphur content of fuel used in shipping could prevent upwards of 45,000 premature deaths a year by reducing exposure to fine particles.

Commission scrutinizes air quality derogations

The EU Commission has approved time extensions for 19 air quality zones, but raised objections to 75 other proposed exemptions.

US to cut CO2 emissions from cars and light-duty trucks

A proposal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road vehicles in the USA will apply for model years from 2012.

Island states demand 95 per cent emission cuts

Island states and least developed countries agree: Rich nations have caused the problem, and should cut emissions 95 per cent by 2050.

Most rich Kyoto countries off track

Many rich countries will not be able to meet their climate commitments through active policy initiatives. Only “hot air” will do the trick.

Editorial: Bring them in

In June 2009, a coalition of environmental organisations presented a benchmark Copenhagen climate treaty. The document describes the path the world must be on to avoid catastrophic climate change, recognising that global temperature increase must be kept well below 2 degrees Celsius.

Main menu

Commission scrutinizes air quality derogations

In this issue

High Noon for 2°C

Pollution treaty to be revised

Still high ozone levels despite less air pollution

Ministers water down pollution legislation

North American ECA met by approval

Shipping climate policy continues to drift

Cutting ship fuel sulphur may save 45,000 lives

Commission scrutinizes air quality derogations

US to cut CO2 emissions from cars and light-duty trucks

Island states demand 95 per cent emission cuts

Most rich Kyoto countries off track

Editorial: Bring them in

Publications

SINK OR SOURCE? Northern Forests at a crossroads

The role of northern forests in limiting warming to 1.5°C

Protecting Northern Forests crucial for biodiversity, the climate and indigenous rights

The 100 largest industry emitters in EU-27

Road to Nowhere

Bioenergy CCS – too little, too expensive, and not net negative

Direct air carbon capture and storage - A waste of time and energy

Carbon emissions from the cement industry can be reduced without CCS

What we do

Air pollution

Climate Change

Policy initiatives

Do Your Bit!