News | Policy initiatives | Acidification & Eutrophication | Air quality | Climate Change| Publications | Events | Links | The Secretariat  
   





 


  No. 2, June 2002.

Cover illustration © Lars-Erik Håkansson (Lehån)

 

Main articles in brief

Editorial: Get on with it!
It must be quite evident, after ten years, that efforts to get to grips with the emissions from shipping on a global basis will yield little in the way of results.

Bunker fuels: Sulphur restrictions underway
The EU Commission has made known its intention of proposing a limit to the sulphur content of marine fuel.

Climate negotiations: The quest for equity
When negotiations on climate get going as to what is to follow after the commitments of the Kyoto protocol have been fulfilled, the term “equity” will undoubtedly surface – how the burden of bringing down the emissions of greenhouse gases is to be distributed fairly among the nations. Acid News presents the concept of equity and three different models of implementing it.

Environmental performance disappointing
Portugal has still not ratified any of the protocols on long-range transboundary air pollution, and emissions continue to increase.

Signs of recovery now starting
The effect that lowering of the emissions of air pollutants is having in Europe is confirmed in an extensive report on the situation in the UK.

Rapid ecomic growth may lead to doubling of emissions
The world´s second largest emitter of carbon dioxide, China, shows no signs of taking the matter of climate seriously.

Environmentalists rage over Bush's "Clear Skies" plan
The president’s plan for curbing emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants has met with scathing criticism from US environmentalists.

Experts outline global motor vehicle policy
Meeting last summer in Bellagio, Italy, to define principles for a single policy for motor vehicles, some leading experts ended by issuing a series of recommendations for policy makers.

Back to top

 

EDITORIAL

Get on with it!

This summer the EU Commission is to present a Community Strategy on Air Pollution from Seagoing Ships. And there is much to be said for such a strategy. Emissions from sources on land have gone down, and are likely to continue to do so, while those from shipping are showing a steady rise. Shipping will thus be contributing ever more to the damage to health and the environment from air pollution. In order to achieve agreed eu aims for environmental quality, measures leading to a marked decrease in the emissions from shipping will be a clear necessity. And, as has been shown in several studies, they would moreover be cost effective.

For many years shipping has been regarded as a sort of free zone, exempt from modern environmental restraints - the excuse usually being that shipping is an international business, needing global agreement if it is to be subject to rules in regard to the environment.

Discussion of the problem was however started towards the end of the eighties within the International Maritime Organization, a un body, and agreement was finally reached in 1997 on an air pollution annex to its marpol Convention. as might have been expected, this turned out to be a very feeble document. Yet despite its timid requirements, it has still only been ratified by five countries, and only by Sweden in the eu. It is therefore highly uncertain when, if ever, it will come into force.

The Commission has recently held two consultation meetings with the member and candidate countries, as well as representatives of some of the affected business interests and environmentalist organizations, in order to try and find a basis for an eu strategy in regard to air pollution from shipping. (See article.) It has been interesting to observe the reactions of the actors in the process to the fact that the Commission has at last decided to take the matter up.

Almost all the member countries had said they were in favour of marpol Annex VI and considered that the EU should avoid asking for any stricter requirements than those already contained in it - despite the fact that many of them were agreed that its requirements for nox could and should be tightened up. That is of course an evasive and hypocritical attitude, seeing that the members have in any case not ratified the annex even after four years. Representatives of the shipping and oil industries expressed scepticism in almost all respects to any new eu initiative in the matter, and often absolute rejection.

It is surprising, to say the least, that neither the member countries nor the shipping industry seem to have realized that up-to-date environmental standards will be essential for the industry's future competitiveness and development. Ships have many environmental advantages over other modes of transportation. Their fuel consumption is lower, they have no problems with such things as noise and congestion, and have much less need for investment in infrastructure than either road or rail transportation. But ships can make no claim to environmental respectability so long as they go on polluting the air with their great emissions of sulphur and nitrogen oxides.

It must be quite evident, after ten years, that efforts to get to grips with the emissions from shipping on a global basis will yield little in the way of results. To get emissions down within a reasonable time, as well as to put pressure on the global negotiating machinery, moves will have to be made both at the national and eu level. The first step must be to get legally binding eu rules to set minimum emission standards. And to bring about sufficiently large reductions more quickly, economic instruments, such as environmentally differentiated charges, will be needed to supplement those rules.

Christer Ågren

Back to top

BUNKER FUELS

Sulphur restrictions underway

At a consultation meeting in Brussels on April 15, the EU Commission made known its intention of proposing a limit to the sulphur content of marine fuel (bunker oils). The proposal, which would amount to a modification of the 1999/32 directive on the sulphur content of  liquid fuels, is to be considered as part of its Community strategy on air pollution from seagoing ships that was announced in January1, and is  expected to be presented during the summer.

The aims of the measures that the Commission outlined in April are:

 1. To reduce the overall emissions in the so-called SECAs (SOx Emission Control Areas - the North and Baltic Seas) as well as in all EU port areas.

2. To establish a regulatory regime with which all seagoing ships will be able to comply by using only two different fuels.

3. To ensure that fuels complying with EU standards will be available in all EU ports.

Among the means for achieving these aims are the following, all of which are to be written into directive 1999/32:

– Member states bordering on the secas of the North and Baltic Seas must ensure that only marine fuels with a sulphur content of less than 1.5 per cent are used in their territorial waters, and possibly also, if applicable, in their exclusive economic zones. This shall apply to all vessels of all flags, either from the date of the marpoL Annex VI coming into force or from January 1, 2005, whichever is the earlier.

Only fuels with less than 0.2 per cent sulphur may be used in inland waterways and eu port areas. (It is suggested that the latter should be defined as extending from the "outer limit of territorial sea to the quayside.")

By 2005 member states must ensure that all marine gas oil sold in their territories shall have less than 0.2 per cent sulphur. (A change in the definition of gas oils is suggested, so as to exclude the so-called DMB and DMC grades.)

At the time of making these preliminary proposals the Commission had no clear information as to what they might lead to in the way of reduced emissions. But more information will be forthcoming anytime now as a result of two fresh studies by outside consultants.

Christer Ågren

1. Article 12 of directive 2001/81, on national emission ceilings for certain air pollutants, obliges the Commission to specify a program of actions aimed at reducing the emissions from international maritime traffic before the end of 2002. A discussion paper issued by the Commission, together with responses from member countries and stakeholders, can be found on the Commission's website.

Increasing emissions

While emissions of air pollutants have declined over the last decade, those from shipping are still on the increase. In 1990 the annual amounts from ships in the seas surrounding Europe were estimated to have been nearly 3 million tons of sulphur dioxide (so2) and 4 million tons of nitrogen oxides (nox). After the fifteen member countries of the eu have fulfilled their commitments in accordance with the directive on national ceilings for emissions, and assuming that emissions from shipping remain at their 1990 level,  by 2010 the latter will be equivalent to three-quarters of the eu total for sulphur and nearly two-thirds of that for nitrogen oxides.

Back to top

CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS

The quest for equity

When negotiations on climate get going as to what is to follow after the commitments of the Kyoto protocol have been fulfilled, the term "equity" will undoubtedly surface - how the burden of bringing down the emissions of greenhouse gases is to be distributed fairly among the nations.

There is still no certainty that the protocol will have come into force when the parties to the climate convention start their next meeting (cop8) in New Delhi on October 23. But however that may be, it can safely be assumed that they will have to begin considering what is to happen after 2012, when each country is supposed to have fulfilled its commitments under the protocol.

One possibility is that starting out from the protocol they will continue to squabble about objectives for emissions, entering on a political tug-of-war with no clear principles for the setting of national emission ceilings. But a much stronger demand is now likely to be raised for definite commitments on the part of the developing countries - for which the US, Australia, and other countries in the so-called umbrella group had been pressing during the Kyoto talks.

It is evident from a simple calculation that no matter which paths negotiations may take, a worldwide climate catastrophe cannot be avoided solely by clamping down on emissions from the industrialized countries, despite their being responsible for by far the greater part of the total. The trouble is that the developing countries are currently increasing their emissions of greenhouse gases at a rate of 4.6 per cent a year, and if the trend continues they will have overtaken the industrialized nations within a relatively short time. It will only be a matter of decades; globally, the emissions of carbon dioxide will go on increasing even if the industrialized countries should manage to achieve far greater reductions than are required of them under the Kyoto protocol.

Nevertheless it is most unlikely that the developing countries in the g77 group will be ready to enter negotiations for the setting of definite ceilings unless there is some basic agreement as to the principles by which the distribution of reductions is to be arranged. They argue, for instance, that it is the historical emissions of the industrialized countries that make them so largely responsible for the present situation, and that the present per-capita emissions of those countries are usually far, far greater than in most of the developing countries. Ceilings that would prevent or delay attainment of living standards comparable to those of the industrialized countries would, they maintain, be inequitable.

As Anil Agarwal and Sunitas Narain ask in Global warming in an unequal world, "Can we really equate the carbon dioxide contributions of gas-guzzling automobiles in Europe and North America or, for that matter, anywhere in the Third World, with the methane emissions of draught cattle and rice fields of subsistence farmers in West Bengal or Thailand? Do these people not have a right to live?"

References to equity will be inevitable during the negotiations. The idea is in any case not new. It had already turned up in the climate convention itself, where Article 3.1 reads: "The Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities." It appears, too, in the Kyoto protocol.

What it can actually mean has already been much discussed. Is it to be interpreted as equity in the course of time - meaning equitable burden sharing between generations - or equity among individuals, with every person on earth assuming his share? Not even the most obvious interpretation - equity between nations (which would also be the most practical for negotiations) - can easily be translated into operational terms.

Most of the proposed models for equity assume a global emission budget, setting a total allowance for man-made emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, with inputs according to the principles on which that total is to be divided both over time and between nations. Two of the three models presented here  follow that line, while a third, the Brazilian, proceeds from simpler assumptions.

Roger Olsson

For this article the writer has drawn largely on the report by Harri Lammi and Oras Tynkkynen, entitled "The Whole Climate," published by Friends of the Earth Finland, 2001.

Defining a global carbon budget

To arrive at a global budget for emissions of carbon, one has to start with an estimate of climate sensitivity - how much it will be affected by a specific rise in the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ipcc), a doubling of co2 concentrations would bring a rise in temperature of 1.5-4.5oC. From this basis it is possible to calculate the concentrations of co2 in the atmosphere corresponding to various assumed rises in world temperature and degrees of climate sensitivity. See table 1.

A global emission budget - the permissible future volume of greenhouse-gas emissions - can be calculated, as the ipcc has done in table 2, for each given concentration of those gases in the atmosphere.

That is as far as one can get with science and mathematics. The next step will be to decide how the "space" demarcated by a co2 budget is to be distributed either over a period of time or among the nations - which is where politics come in.

Table 1. Permissible concentrations of CO2  in the atmosphere (ppmv) at various estimates of climate sensitivity (Hare 1997).  The present concentration is  around 350 ppmv, while the pre-industrial levels were around 280 ppmv.

Climate sensitivity CO2 concentration for:
 1 oC rise  2 oC rise
2.5 oC 348 436
3.5 oC 327 384
4.5 oC 315 357

Table 2. Concentration targets and corresponding emission budgets (GCI 1998). The accumulated CO2 emissions represent the total remaining space for anthropogenic emissions (gigatons of carbon). The annual figure is now around 7 gigatons. 

CO2-conc (ppmv) Accumulated CO2 emissions (GTC)
350 300-430
450 630-650
550 870-890

Back to top

 

EQUITY, PROPOSAL 1:

Fair shares

First coined by Friends of the Earth, the term "environmental space" implies the amount of natural resources that each individual can consume without causing permanent damage to the environment. In the case of climate it means the amount of greenhouse gases that can be let out without giving rise to more damage than they have caused already.

On the basis of the IPCC's call for a reduction of 60-80 per cent in global emissions, and present world population, it could roughly be put at 0.8-1.6 tons of CO2 per capita per annum. As world population continues to grow, that figure will of course gradually have to be lowered, and if effects such as those arising from deforestation are  also taken into account, shrunk still further. The environmental space for carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere, given certain aims, has been calculated at the Centre for Science and Environment in India (CSE), see table.

Table 3. Emission budgets and per capita entitlements for different atmospheric targets. Data from IPCC. The per capita entitlements assume a fixed world population of six billion. MTC = million tons of carbon. (From Agarwal, Narain & Shama 1999).

Conc. target CO2 ppmv Emission budget 1991-2100 (MTC) Average annual budget (MTC) Per capita entitlement (TC)
350 300-430 2.73-2.91 0.46-0.65
450 630-650 5.73-5.91 0.96-0.99
550 870-890 7.91-8.09 1.32-1.35
650 1030-1190 10.27-10.82 1.71-1.80
750 1200-1300 10.91-11.82 1.82-1.97

 

Allowing everybody the same per-capita emissions is a clear and simple way of applying the principle of equity - especially as the climate is a global resource that belongs to all and all are dependent on it. It sweeps automatically away the divide between countries that have limits set to their emissions and those that do not. It can moreover easily be combined with a system for trading in emission permits.

The CSE has adumbrated various schemes for bringing the concept of environmental space into the climate negotiations. One would be to ignore calculations concerning any possible environmental space and set instead a global per-capita quota which could gradually be reduced until it had reached an acceptable level in regard to sustainability. The Indian institute calls this "moving entitlements" -  the idea being that it is more important to move ahead in the right direction than to specify the final figure. But no matter which way is chosen, and what the objective, it will obviously take considerable time before the same per-capita figure has been attained in every country.  

Latest figures (1997) for per capita  CO2 emissions from fuel combustion in relation to the availble environmental space for some of the world's most populous countries. (EIA 1999.)

Back to top

EQUITY, PROPOSAL 2:

The Brazilian model

The Brazilian model for the attainment of equity in dealing with the climate problem was first presented just prior to the Kyoto meeting in 1997. It was followed by a more developed version in 1999, proposing that the industrialized countries should reduce their emissions of the chief greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide - by 30 per cent by 2020, from 1990, as a group. The burden was to be distributed according to the countries cumulative contributions to the rise in global temperature, starting as far back as 1840 but also taking into account any carbon sinks. Each country's climate debt would be its total emissions of carbon dioxide minus the amounts fixed in man-made sinks.

The countries that had been the first to industrialize would thus have accumulated large climate debts and so brought upon themselves claims for a big reduction of their emissions. The uk would, for example, have to have brought down its emissions of carbon dioxide by 63 per cent by 2020, but Italy only by 10 per cent.

The Brazilian model makes use of the division of the world's countries into the Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 ones of the climate convention, where only the Annex 1 (industrialized) countries are subject to bin-ding commitments to cut down emissions. Various criteria and methods have been discussed as to the way further countries might be brought into the Annex 1 group, possibly by setting a threshold in the form of per capita income. But calculations made by the Dutch National Institute of Public Health and Environment show that it would have to be put very low. Even if the developing countries were pulled in when their per-capita income was 10 per cent of that of the Annex 1 countries, the latter would still have to go on reducing their emissions at a rate of 10 per cent per annum.

The Brazilian proposal is appealing on account of  its basic idea: the greater a country's guilt for the present situation, the greater its responsibility for clearing it up. But it has been criticized for taking too litt-le consideration of the great differences in emissions. Is it reasonable, for instance that the uk, with a per capita figure of 10 tons of co2 per annum, should have to reduce by 60 per cent, while the us, with double that amount,  should get away with little more than 20 per cent?

The data used to arrive at the historical climate debt has also been questioned, consisting as it often does of very rough extrapolations. There are for instance some studies indicating that Britain's emissions in the nineteenth century were not even half of the figure assumed by the Brazilians.  

Table 4. Emission reduction targets for the fifteen EU countries and a selection of others in the Brazilian proposal.

Country Reduction, % Country Reduction, %
UK 63.3 Poland  16.7
Luxembourg 41.7 Canada 16.1
Belgium 37.4 Ireland 14.0
Germany 27.4 Russia 11.5
Sweden 25.0 Australia 11.3
France 24.4 Finland 10.7
USA 22.3 Italy 10.5
Hungary 20.3 Spain 10.5
Netherlands 18.8 Japan 9.5
Denmark 17.8 Portugal 8.4
Austria 17.6 Greece 7.5

Back to top

EQUITY, PROPOSAL 3:

Contraction and convergence

This is an application of the environmental space approach that has been developed by the Global Commons Institute (GCI) in England. Assuming that the end aim will be to allow the concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to rise to 450 ppmv at the most, a global CO2 budget would yield a space for anthropogenic emissions equal to 630-650 gigatons of coal. But with deforestation taken into account, it would be no more than 295-315 gigatons.

In order to keep within that budget, emissions would have to be gradually reduced to the point where output and capture of carbon dioxide balance each other. That is the contraction part of the model. The GCI proposes stepwise reductions up to the target year. While they should not be set unrealistically high for the initial stages, if the reductions then turn out to have been too slow it will be necessary to bring about "negative" emissions (less than is being taken up by sinks) towards the end of the period. A reduction of altogether 60 per cent will be needed if the budget is to be met.

According to the GCI model, by 2045 every country should be emitting the same amount per capita. Here we have convergence. It means that the industrialized countries, with their present high per-capita emissions, will have to make hefty reductions, while the developing ones will be able to go on increasing their emissions. Although the assumption is that convergence will take place exponentially, the model also allows for linear convergence. Reductions will have to continue even after all countries have got down to the same per-capita level, but then at the same rate for all.

The GCI argues that there can be no solution to the climate crisis without these two key elements: contraction and convergence. If a catastrophic change in climate is to be avoided, the developing countries will also have to accept reduction targets - which means that there must be a model for burden sharing that is not inherently inequitable.

It may of course be a question whether a solution requiring the industrialized countries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases by up to 80 per cent, together with calls for commitments on the part of the developing countries to reduce theirs within a relatively short time, will have any chance of being politically acceptable. But the answer may already have been given. The contraction-and-convergence model has surfaced several times at international meetings and found support in  many quarters, including India, China, and the European parliament. But so far the backing has been insufficient for it to be taken up seriously in the climate negotiations.

Contraction and convergence to 450 ppmv. (GCI 1997)

 

Back to top

PORTUGAL

Environmental performance disappointing

Unlike most of the countries of western Europe, by the end of the 90's  Portugal had still not decoupled its emissions of pollutants from economic growth. As appears from a fresh environmental performance review published by the oecd at the end of last year, whereas European emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides were decreasing during that decade, Portugal's were increasing. The OECD reviews cover a wide range of issues, but here only air pollution will he considered.

Between 1990 and 1998 Portuguese emissions of SO2, NOx, and VOCs increased by 4, 17, and 27 per cent. A common indicator for expressing environmental efficiency is emission intensity, which is usually calculated as the ratio between emissions and economic output - expressed for instance as kilograms per thousand dollars of GDP, gross domestic product. High values indicate bad performance. By the end of the 90's Portugal's emissions intensities for SO2 and NOx were 40 - 50 per cent higher than the OECD average for Europe.

Although emissions have been increasing, monitoring has revealed some progress in lowering ambient levels of SO2 and NO2 in major cities such as Lisbon and Porto. The concentrations of these pollutants have however continued to increase in some industrialized areas, and according to the oecd the downward trend for NO2 was likely to have ceased or even become reversed in major cities in 2000.

Elevated concentrations of ground-level ozone are common in Portugal, often exceeding eu information values for the protection of health. The frequency and severity of ozone episodes suggest - in the OECD analysis -  a need to limit the precursors, NOx and VOCs.

Studies relating  ambient air-quality levels to health damage are lacking in Portugal. But if the current trend with rising concentrations continues - particularly of ground-level ozone and fine  particles - such studies will, in the view of the OECD, be essential for evaluating the exposure risks and the measures that will be necessary for protecting the population.

Portugal is one of the parties to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLTRAP) to which seven binding protocols for reducing emissions  have been added since its coming into force in 1983,  and although Portugal has signed four of these, it stands out as the only EU member country that has (so far) not ratified any of them.

Portugal has signed the 1999 Gothenburg protocol, and in order to meet its commitments under that protocol it will need to reduce its emissions of SO2, NOx, and VOCs by 57, 32, and 63 per cent, respectively, by 2010 from their 1998 levels. And to achieve the reductions required in the recently adopted. EU directive on national ceilings (the NEC directive) it will have to cut down emissions still further.

It can hardly be a matter of surprise that one of the recommendations in the OECD report is that Portugal should take further measures to reduce emissions of SO2, NOx and VOCs. These should include the development of energy-efficiency programs, improvements in fuel quality, a further development of public transport,  and a strengthening of the guidance function of environmentally related taxes affecting transportation.  Moreover, air-quality monitoring should be expanded, and programs for the management of air quality in major cities should be set up or improved.

Christer Ågren

1. Environmental performance reviews: Portugal (2001). Published by and available from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.

 

 

 

 

 

Portugal's emissions, actual and required, of SO2, NOx, VOCs and NH3, 1990 and 1998 (kilotons). Emission ceilings 2010 according to the Gothenburg protocol and the EU NEC directive.

Back to top

ACIDIFICATION

Signs of recovery now starting

There is starting to be clear evidence that the reduction of the emissions of air pollutants in Europe is having an effect. A report for the UK , made by the National Expert Group on Transboundary Air Pollution1, shows for instance that ecosystems damaged by acid rain are now beginning to recover. Considerable remaining problems - concerning ground-level ozone and terrestrial eutrophication in particular - will however require further cut-downs of emissions for their solution.

The Group's 300 page report is a solid and exhaustive compendium of present-day knowledge in regard to acidifying, ozone-forming, and eu-trophying air pollutants. Emissions, concentrations, depositions, and environmental effects  are all treated in detail, as are computer modelling and the mapping of areas with critical loads.

It sets off by confirming that emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2), both in Britain and Europe as a whole, have fallen away markedly in recent decades. Since 1990 those of nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compound (VOCs), and ammonia (NH3) are also reported as having gone down and as being expected to continue to do so during the next ten years in consequence of international agreements and the directive on national ceilings for emissions. (More on UK emissions here.)

Depositions of sulphur have become more than halved since 1986 as a result of emissions having been reduced, with a similar decrease in rainfall acidity. Whereas there was a very large decline in depositions and concentrations of sulphur in the central and eastern parts of the country, few reductions could be detected at west-coast sites - one reason being that the western side is exposed to sulphur pollution from international shipping and North American emissions. Between 1986 and 1997 us emissions had changed very little, only going down by 12 per cent. But what is more important is that those from North Atlantic shipping have shown a substantial increase in consequence of increases both in traffic and the sulphur content of marine fuel.

No comparative trends can be seen for nitrogen pollutants. Concentrations and depositions of oxidized nitrogen compounds (originating from nox emissions) do indeed appear to have fallen by 10-20 per cent during the 90s, but no significant changes have been recorded for the reduced kind (coming from emissions of ammonia).

Potential aicidification by N and S (circles) and concentration of H+ (acidity) in UK rainfall (maps) 1986 and 1997.

 

While the total deposition of potentially acidifying pollutants has been declining as a result of lower sulphur deposition, the relative contribution of nitrogen has been increasing so as to substantially exceed that of sulphur. While the total nitrogen deposition averages 17 kg per hectare a year, on forest soils it is reckoned to be 33 kg/ha. Reduced nitrogen dominates the input, averaging two-thirds of the total. Nitrogen deposition is especially high in uplands exposed to frequent hill cloud in the polluted regions of the country, where it may be more than 50 kg/ha.

Like the Scandinavian countries, the UK has large areas of acid-sensitive soils, where widespread acidification has occurred all through the last century, and despite the reduced deposition there is as yet little evidence  of recovery. Soil recovery is expressed in terms of base saturation, which is dependent on the supply of base cations from weathering and atmospheric inputs. Such recovery is expected to take a very long time, probably decades, even under assumptions of stringent reductions of depositions. Some upland soils are unlikely ever to be able to recover their pre-industrial status.

Records of lake sediments show the acidification of freshwaters to have become widespread all over  uk uplands since the 1850s, with major damage to biodiversity. In Wales alone more than 12,000 of the 24,000 km of river have been affected, with serious consequences to plant and animal life. But in contrast to the situation for soil, here there is clear evidence of changes in water chemistry, indicating a start of recovery from acidification in most areas since the 1970s. There are also some signs of biological recovery, albeit modest and restricted to a small number of locations.

Decreases in  SO2 concentrations over the past two or three decades have had marked positive effects on vegetation, with substantial increases, for instance, in the distribution of many lichen species. It says in the report that the main threats to vegetation come from nitrogen deposition and ozone. There is evidence of change due to nitrogen in semi-natural plant communities, seen for instance as reductions in diversity, especially in nutrient-poor habitats. Summer concentrations of ozone reach values that also pose a threat to the health and productivity of semi-natural plants and farm crops in the UK.

There are no signs of recovery whatsoever, either chemical or biological, from the eutrophying effects of nitrogen deposition, and recovery is expected to be very slow even after  deposition has been reduced sufficiently to allow it to begin.

In general, the change in the pollution climate in the UK during the last two decades has been similar to that observed elsewhere in Europe - from domination by sulphur to domination by nitrogen compounds and ozone. Commitments by the uk and other countries to go on reducing their emissions over the coming decade will not however suffice to solve the problems - as can be seen from projections for the situation in 2010, based on the commitments of the 1999 Gothenburg protocol to the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution.

The most recent data on the exceeding of critical loads for acidification in the UK show the situation as it was in 1997, when 71 per cent of the sensitive ecosystems were estimated to be exposed to depositions in excess of such loads.That figure is expected to decline to 46 per cent by 2010. See table below.

Percentage of UK ecosystem areas exposed to deposition of acidifying pollutants in excess of their critical loads for acidity in 1995-97 and 2010.

Ecosystem type 1995-97 2010
Acid grassland 80 50
Calcareous grassland 32 18
Heathland 69 49
Coniferous woodland 69 38
Deciduous woodland 82 68
Freshwaters 18 9
All ecosystems 71 46

Using a grid with 1x1 km squares, the critical loads for eutrophication were estimated to have been exceeded in 1997 in 25 per cent of the squares where there was sensitive grassland, and in 55 per cent of those with heathland. These percentages are expected to have declined approximately to 20 and 40 per cent by 2010.

As for ozone, the situation in the UK is similar to that in large parts of the European continent - with levels continuing to exceed the thresholds for damage to vegetation and human health. Since the mid-1980s there has however been a distinct decline in peak episodic concentrations, a process that is expected to continue as a result of strategies for the abatement of emissions both in North America and western Europe.

At the same time the mean, so-called background concentrations have however continued to increase. Evaluations of historical measurements indicate that the annual mean concentrations have more than doubled in Europe since the early 1900s, from 10-15 ppb to about 30 ppb. Studies have moreover shown this increase to be consistent with known changes in man-made emissions of the ozone precursors nox, methane (ch4), and carbon monoxide (co). While the emissions of these pollutants are on the way down in western Europe, increases in eastern Europe and Asia are expected to cause the annual mean concentrations to go on risng in Europe generally for a long time to come. Computer model runs for the years 2030, 2060, and 2100 show a steady rise in concentrations over the next century, with a considerable expansion of areas with levels exceeding 60 ppb.

In conclusion it may be said that ecological problems arising from air pollution are common to large areas of Europe. While emissions and depositions of sulphur have declined substantially over the last few decades, those of nitrogen compounds have changed very little. In continental Europe, as well as in the uk, nitrogen deposition and elevated concentrations of ozone constituite the major ecological problems from air pollution. Although the European emissions of the ozone precursors and nitrogen are expected to have come down by 2010, there will still be a widespread exceeding of critical loads and levels.

Christer Ågren

1 Transboundary air pollution: acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone in the UK (2001). Prepared by and available from the National Group on Transboundary Air Pollution on behalf of the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). While primarily dealing with the UK, the report also includes copious data from other countries, as well as glances at the situation in Europe as a whole.

 

UK emissions decreasing

Emissions of SO2 are traceable for the most part to burning of the fossil fuels coal and oil. In the UK, as in most of Europe, the proportion of sulphur emissions from oil burning dropped after the oil crisis of the seventies, from 40 per cent in 1970 to less than 20 per cent in 1999. The share of coal has consequently increased, from 56 to 74 per cent. During that period, the country's total emissions of sulphur nevertheless dropped, from 6.5 to 1.2 million tons a year - a reduction of more than 80 per cent.

Between 1970 and 1990 most of the reductions were from "low-level" sources brought about by a switch from solid and liquid fuels with high sulphur contents to natural gas in all sectors, industrial, commercial, and domestic. A downward trend in the sulphur content of liquid fuels also helped  to reduce emissions. The reductions that took place after 1990 came on the other hand from "high-stack" sources - from the generation of electricity, where they were due in the main to the de-regulation of gas use, although laws on emission control, especially for the integrated control of pollution from large plants, also played a part.

Means envisaged by the reporting group to enable the uk to get under its ceiling for emissions by 2010 include a continued reduction of the sulphur content of liquid fuels and the switch to natural gas, as well as flue-gas desulphurization (FGD) and the use of low-sulphur coal for power generation. So far only two of the country's 40 or so large coal-fired power plants have been retrofitted for fgd.

Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) increased greatly after 1983, mainly because of the growth in road traffic. They reached a peak in 1989, after which they declined by more than 40 per cent as a result of reductions in the power sector (caused by fuel switching and the installation of low-NOx burners), but also of a decrease in emissions from road vehicles due to a growing fraction of cars with catalytic converters. In 1999 road transportation accounted for 44 per cent of all the country's emissions, power plants for only 21 per cent. The gradual accession of new vehicles fulfilling stricter eu emission standards is considered to provide the best possibility for attaining the 2010 ceiling for NOx emissions.

It is hardly surprising that the trend for emissions of volatile organic compounds should be largely similar to that for nitrogen oxides, since the chief contributing factor is the same in both cases, namely, road transportation. Following their peak in 1989, they have come down by approximately 55 per cent, primarily as a result of cleaner vehicles. The reduction is expected to continue for some years, as new cars with increasingly effective emissions control replace older vehicles. Additional measures are however expected to be needed if the ceiling for emissions is to be attained by 2010.

Emissions of ammonia (NH3) come mainly from farming, which was responsible for more than 80 per cent of the national total in 1999.  It is highly likely that the data for ammonia are underestimates; computer modelling makes it appear that the real figures should be 30 per cent higher. The conclusion must be that the modest target of the directive on national ceilings for emissions can be met solely through forecast changes in agricultural policy.

Christer Ågren  

Actual UK emissions in 1970-99 and projections for 2010 in line with the EU directive on national emission ceilings (kilotons per annum).

  1970 1980 1990 1999 2010
SO2 6 518 4 880 3 754 1 187 585
NOx 2 493 2 580 2 756 1 603 1167
VOCs - 2 373 2 657 1 744 1 200
NH3 -  -  365 348 297

Back to top

CHINA

Rapid growth may lead to doubling of emissions

With 14 per cent of the world total for emissions of carbon dioxide, China is only exceeded by the United States, which is responsible for 25 per cent. Apart from a rapid population growth, what keeps pushing up emissions is China's surging economic expansion, bringing an increasing use of energy, primarily from coal.

Between 1980 and 1995 China's gross domestic product rose on an average by 9.4 per cent yearly. The demand, for electricity doubled between 1986 and 1995, the increase occurring mostly in the cities, where it amounted to 16.5 per cent a year from 1986 to 1993. Out in the country it was only 2 per cent. In the cities the rise was mainly due to increasing household affluence, allowing people to spend money on such things as washing machines, tv sets, refrigerators, air conditioning, and electrical gadgets generally. Between 1986 and 1993 sales of washing machines and TVs increased by 80 per cent. Yet all the time 100 million Chinese in rural areas were still without electricity.

Due largely to increased car ownership, oil consumption will be likely to have risen by 80 per cent in 2010, according to a Shell forecast. Today there are no more than 3.2 cars per thousand of population in China - less than in India, and 200 times less than in the US.

Carbon dioxide emissions

Recent statistics from the International Energy Agency show China's emissions of carbon dioxide to have peaked in 1996, when they amounted to 3.2 billion tons. Although they have since declined year by year, which is of course all to the good, that will hardly affect the long-term trend in emissions generally.

According to Jonathan Pershing, head of the Energy and Environment Division of the International Energy Agency, this drop in the emissions of carbon dioxide can be ascribed to several factors, among them being the closure of illegal coal mines, change in the quality of the coal that is being burned, and a strong switch to gas. It may also be that coal use is now being calculated differently.

From the point of view of climate, the innumerable coal fires are of special significance. Some 100 to 200 million tons of coal go up in smoke every year as a result of spontaneous combustion. That is five to ten times as much as China exports. Since many of the fires occur in isolated desert and mountain regions, too, they are often not immediately noticed.

Foreign analysts have often questioned the reliability of Chinese statistics. There is for instance uncertainty as to the number of coal mines that are actually being shut down, as well as to the rate at which the switch from coal to gas is proceeding in the larger cities. Nevertheless there can be no doubt that China is the world's largest producer and consumer of coal.

Although coal is firmly established as the chief source of energy in China, there are possibilities for diversification and even eagerness to seize them, according to Joakim Nordqvist, who is working on a doctorate at Lund technical university. He is studying the ways in which improved energy efficiency and reduced emissions of greenhouse gases can best be promoted in China's process of industrial development. He thinks China has great possibilities for increasing its production of energy from renewable sources. In rural areas biomass from farm residues could, he says, easily compete with coal. There are enormous amounts available, and it has always been used, albeit ineffectively, for domestic heating and cooking. He also notes a rapid expansion of wind power, with big projects proposed for Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang. Even as early as the mid-nineties, China had installed 50 MW of wind power.

A government plan for the development of renewable energy has been set for the period from 1996 to 2010. But according to the Dutch NPR during the next couple of decades most of the alternative energies will cost more than coal. It seems therefore most unlikely that that market forces alone will suffice to bring about an increase in the use of "green" energy. Any real advances will need action by the Chinese government in company with foreign partners.

Today natural gas accounts for no more than 2.5 to 3 per cent of the country's energy. At the present rate of consumption China's reserves should last for 70-120 years. A great part of them lies in the Tarim region of western China, and cooperation is now being sought with foreign firms to build pipelines from the western parts of the country to the east coast. There are also plans for importing gas from Russia and Kazakhstan, which would however call for enormous investments in infrastructure. China still only accounts for 1 per cent of world consumption of natural gas.

The NRP opines that the best chances China has of reducing its emissions of carbon dioxide will lie in improvement of the use of energy in the various sectors. After passing a law on energy saving in 1998, in 2000 the government stepped out on an entirely new policy for the promotion of combined heat-and-power. The forces working most for greater efficiency in the use of energy in China are economic reform and the need to cut down on air pollution locally. Standing in the way of a better use of energy is however, according to NRP, the all-too-low price of electricity in China.

Climate policy

Despite having formed a national committee on climate in 1990, and ratifying the climate convention early in 1993, China still shows no signs of taking up the matter of climate on a broad political basis. The debate continues to be dominated by local environmental problems such as untreated sewage and unhealthy air. A poll carried out by the Asian development bank a couple of years ago revealed the matter of climate to come tenth among the most pressing environmental issues even for those actively engaged for such matters.

During international negotiations China has repeatedly emphasized that attention to climate cannot be a priority for developing nations -maintaining that it must rest on the industrialized countries to take the first steps to cut back emissions.

"China does not intend," says Joakim Nordqvist, "to take any responsibility for climate matters until the industrialized countries, which are responsible for the overwhelmingly greater part of the accumulated, historical emissions of greenhouse gases, show themselves prepared to shoulder responsibility by taking concrete measures."

As Bo Kjellén, who headed the Swedish delegation at international meetings from 1992 to 2001, has noted: China's participation in the negotiations has been distinguished by close collaboration with other developing countries in the so-called G77 group. At times it has been the most vigorous exponent of the view that binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions should only be required of the industrialized countries.

Kjellén goes on to say that up to the Kyoto meeting of 1997, China often took a distinct "anti-colonialist" attitude, but has since toned down the rhetoric. At the conferences in Bonn and Marrakech in 2001, it appeared to wish to be genuinely constructive.

China supports the Kyoto protocol and wants to see it come into force as soon as possible. Its environmental protection agency sees a chance for China to reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases in an economically advantageous manner in the protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, which allows industrialized countries to fulfil part of  their quotas by giving support to climate projects in developing countries.

China states blankly that it cannot make any binding commitments before it has attained "medium status" as regards economic development - which it considers impossible before 2020. But according to the NRP, in the view of some experts on the Chinese situation it is more likely to be 2040 or 2050.

Magnus Andersson

Source: An Asian Dilemma (2002). NRP, the Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and. Climate Change.


 

Figure 1. Chinese energy production by fuel 1980-2015 (quadrillion British Thermal units, Btu). Source: Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 1997 (www.eia.doe.gov)

 

Figure 2. Energy intensity 1970-2015, China and USA, thousand Btu per GDP dollar. Source: Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 1997.

 

Back to top

USA

Environmentalists rage over Bush's "Clear Skies" plan

In February President George W. Bush presented his plan for curbing US emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. The proposal has been described by the White House as "the most aggressive initiative in American history to cut power plant emissions, as well as a bold new strategy for addressing global climate change." It has nevertheless met with widespread criticism both from governments in other countries and environmentalist organizations everywhere.

Bush's proposal consists of two main parts, the one being the Clear Skies Initiative aimed at cutting the emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury from power plants by 70 per cent by 2018, from  today's levels, and the other a strategy for reducing greenhouse-gas intensity by 18 per cent over the next ten years. The latter, according to the White House, is intended to slow the growth of greenhouse-gas emissions.  Greenhouse  gas intensity is the ratio of emissions to economic output, expressed in terms of gdp.

Today US power plants are responsible for about two-thirds of  emissions of sulphur, a good third of those of mercury, and a quarter of the nitrogen oxides (see box below). If emissions from other sources should remain constant over the next sixteen years, the country's total emissions of SO2 should drop by about a half as a result of the Bush plan, those of mercury by a quarter, and NOx by a sixth.

It is intended that reductions shall be achieved in two stages by a so-called cap-and-trade program, with 2010 and 2018 as the target years. The program can be regarded as a continuation and extension of the Acid Rain Program accompanying the Clean Air Act of 1990. Between 1990 and 2000 emissions of SO2 from power plants came down by some 30 per cent as a result of Phase 1 of that program - from 15.7 to 11.2 million tons a year. The us total shrank by 20 per cent.

During the same period EU emission's of sulphur had come down by about 60 per cent. While the US had increased its emissions of nitrogen oxides by 5 per cent, or 1.7 million tons, between 1990 and 1999, the fifteen EU countries had brought theirs down by 25 per cent. See figures below.

Figure 1. US and EU emissions of SO2 and NOx (millions of tons)1980-1999, with projections for 2010. Source: EMEP MSC-W Note 1/01.

 

Figure 2. Emissions intensity for SO2 and NOx in 1999 in the US as compared with the EU. Expressed as emissions intensity per capita (kg/individual) and as ratio of emissions to economic output (kg/US$1000 of GBP). (Population and GDP data for 1990 from the OECD report, giving total populations of 271 million for the US and 376 million for the EU. Gross domestic product, GDP:  US$  868l billion for the US and US$  7880 billion for the EU, in terms of 1995 prices and purchasing power parity).

 

American environmentalists' response to Bush's air pollution plan was scathing. The Clean Air Trust called it a "cynical PR ploy to distract public attention away from roll-backs of existing Clean Air Act requirements." Prank O'Donnell, executive director of the Trust, said it "could also be called the Ghost of Enron, "because it is virtually identical with a scheme that Enron lobbied before the company imploded." He noted that the plan would permit more air pollution in the future than strict enforcement of the current Clean Air Act would.

Less than a week after publication of the Bush plan, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a press release in which it made public previously undisclosed Environmental Protection Agency documents which according to the NRDC reveal ways in which the Bush administration is scheming to undermine federal air-pollution standards.

"These documents show in black-and-white how Bush political appointees at EPAARE trying to cripple the Clean Air Act," said John Waike, director of NRDC's Air Program. "More than 30,000 Americans die every year from power plant pollution alone, and weakening of the standards would," he said,"only make things worse."

The way in which it is proposed to limit greenhouse-gas emissions has also met with heavy criticism. According to Environment Defense, the Bush administration´s "greenhouse gas intensity policy" contains no new plan, no new requirement, and no new strategy whatsoever that could bring about changes from the current us trend of of steadily increasing greenhouse-gas emissions.

Criticism has also been forthcoming from outside the US. The official EU attitude was made public on February 20 in the form of a common statement by environment commissioner Margot Wallström and the Spanish environment minister Jaume Matas, in which they emphasize that "the Climate Change Convention of 1992, to which the US is a party, requires industrialized countries to stabilize their greenhouse gas emissions at 1990 levels. Achieving this would only be a first step towards stabilizing global greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous climate change. This is the ultimate objective of the Convention to which the us has subscribed."

Scrutinizing developments in the us, they note further: "Over the past years greenhouse gas emissions intensity in relation to GDP has been falling in the us. The Bush plan is based on a prolongation of this trend, thereby in effect foreseeing little more than business-as-usual." Current emission projections for the us indicate an increase of 39 per cent above 1990 levels in 2012. While the intensity improvements may reduce this to around 33 per cent, that is still a very substantial increase in absolute emissions." They add that the EU is concerned about the purely voluntary nature of the actions proposed, and that a review of the effectiveness of the measures will, moreover, not take place before 2012.

Christer Ågren

For more information: The White House, Natural Resources Defense Council, Clean Air Trust, Environmental Defense

Back to top

US polluters listed

Of all the carbon dioxide, mercury, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur dioxide emitted by the 100 largest power-generating companies in the us, half comes from just twenty of them. Four to six companies alone have been found to account for 25 per cent of the emissions of each of these pollutants.

There are more than 5,000 plants for the generation of electricity in the  US. Of these, 1,900 are owned and operated by the 100 largest utility companies. They generate 90 per cent of the electricity -  and also produce 90 per cent of the country's emissions.

In the year 2000 fossil fuels were being used to generate about 70 per cent of US electricity, with coal accounting for 52 per cent. Also according to the report here quoted, there is practically no state-of-the-art pollution control in any of the existing plants.

Although it might seem obvious that the largest generators  would be the greatest emitters, there are considerable differences between them as regards emissions per generated megawatt-hour. In this respect four companies had twice the average us rate for nox emissions, and eight more than twice that for  so2. The little difference in companies' performance as regards co2 can be explained by the fact that this pollutant cannot be reduced by technical abatement measures.

The chief reason for the differences between companies is that they use different fuels. Those using fossil fuels only  will in general show higher emissions per megawatt-hour than companies with some nuclear generation. There are nevertheless considerable differences between companies using the same kind of fuel, the worst emitting twice as much nox and four times as much so2 per ton of coal burnt, as the best performers. While revealing variety in the techniques used for firing and flue-gas cleaning, the statistics also give an idea of the potential for emission reductions, even with no change in electricity output or fuel mix.

Roger Olsson

1 Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Generation Owners in the U.S. - 2000. Published by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (CERES) and the Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PSEG). The report is available at CERES.

A few giant power companies are responsible for the greater part of the air pollution from the US energy sector.  Here are the emissions of SO2, NOx (1000 tons) and CO2 (mill tons) from the 3 or 4 largest emitters, accounting for 25 per cent of the sector's  total emissions.

Back to top

SOLAR ENERGY

Could possibly cover a quarter of world need

Within twenty years electricity for a billion people could come from solar cells. Their manufacture and installation is already a billion dollar business, and if the market continues to grow at the present rate (at about 30 per cent a year), by 2020 we should be obtaining 276 TWh a year from solar cells. The industry would then be employing 2.3 million people, have an investment value of us$75 billion a year and bring the cost of solar modules down to 1 dollar per watt delivered.

This scenario is presented in a report from Greenpeace international and the European Photovoltaic Industry Association.1

If the 276 TWh from solar cells should replace electricity from coal, it would cut 165 million tons from the emissions of carbon dioxide - the same amount as from 44 million cars or 75 coal-fired power plants. But 276 TWh would only be 1 per cent of the world demand for energy in 2020. If on the other hand the market for solar energy should grow by 15 per cent a year between 2020 and 2040, at the end of that period solar output would be more than 9000 TWh, and meet 25 per cent of the total forecast demand for electricity.

Sven Teske, Greenpeace expert in energy matters, emphasizes however that such a development will not come about of itself, saying that it is a realistic, achievable goal, but requiring clear political support from governments around the world. He adds"In particular the European Commission must ensure that innovative national incentive schemes for solar electricity are not invalidated on competition grounds."

Japan and Germany are mentioned as countries with determined policies involving far-reaching support for the expansion of solar power. Also pointed out is the importance of clearing away regulatory barriers hindering solar power, as well as the subsidies to fossil and nuclear fuels that now put energy from renewable sources at a disadvantage.

Per Elvingson

1 Solar generation. Available at www.greenpeace.org.

Back to top

CAR EMISSIONS

Experts outline global motor vehicle policy

An international regulatory system that would force manufacturers to employ the best techniques and comply with the most stringent emission standards would not only spare the environment but also money.

A set of rules that will be applicable everywhere is needed if motor vehicle  manufacturers and associated businesses are to be made to adopt the best techniques and adhere to the strictest standards concerning emissions anywhere. Although  operating on a worldwide scale, the auto and oil industries are having to meet greatly differing regulations even in their chief markets. They are having to spend billions  of dollars in designing products to suit different regulatory systems. Consequently hundreds of millions of people are getting no gain from the best ones there are for reducing pollution and cutting the waste of energy.

 In order to penetrate these problems further, some leading experts in techniques and public policies for motor vehicles met last summer at Bellagio, Italy, with the intention of defining the principles for a single global policy on motor vehicles and fuels. Arranged by The Energy Foundation 1, the meeting culminated in 43 recommendations, representing a consensus of the views of eighteen experts from Japan, China, the United States, and the EU countries2.

An ever growing number of vehicles the world over is threatening to nullify the considerable advances made in many places to cut down the emissions from motor vehicles. It will be crucial, for stabilizing the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, to reduce emissions from the transportation sector - which is now accountable for 26 per cent of the global carbon emissions. The International Energy Agency projects that the transport sector emissions will rise by 75 per cent between 1997 and 2020. A similar trend is foreseen for all air pollutants. And unless vigorous controls are applied, emissions from road vehicles in non-OECD countries are projected to be three to six times higher in 2030 than they were in 1990.

According to the Bellagio experts, there are good technical possibilities for averting such a development. In many of the industrialized countries new cars are now certified to emit less than 10 per cent of the pollutants that used to come out of vehicles without catalyzers.

The group summarized its 43 recommendations in just eight broad ones for policymakers, saying they should:

1. Design programs and policies so as to reduce toxics and noise as well as other types of pollution, including greenhouse gases, in parallel, and ensure that future technologies will provide major improvements in each case. 

2. Base policies explicitly on performance in relation to societal objectives, without any special consideration to specific fuels, technologies, or vehicle types.

3. Developing as well as industrialized countries should expect and require use of the best technologies that are available anywhere. It will neither be necessary nor cost-effective for developing countries to follow exactly in the footsteps of the industrialized ones when trying to make improvements.

4. Use combinations of economic instruments and regulatory requirements and make related policies complementary.

 5. Make policies treat vehicles  and fuels as a single system, and move towards standards taking consideration of life-cycle emissions - from the production, distribution, and disposal both of vehicles and fuels.

6. Use more realistic and representative test procedures, greater manufacturer accountability, improved inspection and maintenance programs, on-board monitoring and diagnostics, retrofit and scrappage programs as means of preventing high emissions from vehicles when they have come into use.

7. Consider the cost-effectiveness of imminent measures as well as the market potential for future technologies.

8. Work across jurisdictions, national and international, in order to strengthen programs and give cohesive signals to the affected industries.

Among actual measures considered most urgent by the Bellagio group  was one for an immediate stop to leaded petrol and the introduction of a near-zero limit (10 ppm) for sulphur in all fuels except residual bunker oils.

 Roger Olsson

1 The Energy Foundation is a partnership of major US foundations interested in sustainable energy. It was launched in 1991 by The MacArthur Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, and The Rockefeller Foundation.

2 Bellagio memorandum on Motor Vehicle Policy. Principles for vehicles and fuels in response to global environmental and health imperatives. Can be downloaded from The Energy Foundation.

EU emission standards for car emissions 1984-2010. 
Source: Michael Walsh.

 

Projected trends in the emissions from road vehicles worldwide 1990 - 2030. Source: Michael Walsh.

Back to top

EU news in brief

Stricter limits for motorcycles

 

On March 19, conciliation talks between the European Parliament and the Council resulted in agreement on an amendment to directive 97/24/ec on the reduction of polluting emissions from two- and three-wheeled motor vehicles. New emission standards will be introduced in two steps, in 2003 and in 2006. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (vocs) and carbon monoxide (co) from new motorcycles are expected to drop by about two thirds. The text to the new directive has to be approved by the Parliament and Council at a third reading.

 

...and for other engines as well

The Council adopted a common position on April 22 regarding a proposal to set standards for emission and noise from pleasure-craft engines, to amend directive 94/25/ec. A  common position has also been adopted on the amendment of directive 97/68/ec, dealing with emissions of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines installed in non-road mobile machinery. The European Parliament now has to give the proposals, which were presented in an 1/01, a second reading under the co-decision procedure.

 

Infringement actions threatened

 

The European Commission has sent warnings of possible court action over alleged failures to comply properly with eu law. So-called reasoned opinions were sent in April to Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the uk for failing to pass into national law limits on certain air pollutants contained in the first daughter directive on air quality (99/30/ec), as they should have done by July 19, 2001. Warning letters were sent to Germany, Greece, Ireland, Spain, and the uk for failing to notify the Commission concerning national regulations to give effect to the 1996 framework directive on air quality by July 19, 2001.

Sixth environment action plan agreed

After conciliation talks, representatives of the Council and Parliament agreed on March 12 the main outline of eu's sixth environment action program. The Parliament had already dropped a number of amendments from its first reading, introducing a series of more concrete environmental targets. During the conciliation talks, Parliament also abandoned a proposal aiming at reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by 1 per cent annually up to 2020.

 

Fighting to dilute EU paint curbs

Proposed new eu curbs on volatile organic emissions from paints and varnishes will hit small and medium-sized solvent producers hard and give no guarantee of justifiable environmental gains, according to their trade association, Esig. The industry is trying to get a preliminary text for a directive text by the Commission's environment directorate softened down. It would  impose limits on vocs in decorative paints and varnishes. The directorate says the curbs will prevent the emissions of  279,000 tons of vocs by 2010, at an annual cost of 108-157 million euros.  By contrast, it puts the health-related benefits at more than triple that amount.

Source: Environment Daily 1216, 16/05/02

Too many holes in Spanish plan

The eu presidency, Spain, has put forward a detailed proposal for a directive on energy taxes, which could be finalized by the end of this year. It includes recommendations for minimum national rates for excise duty on various fossil energy products plus electricity, to be introduced within four years.  A long series of exemptions in it has already been criticized by the Commission.

According to the proposal only energy used for heating or fuel, and not as a feedstock material, would be taxed.   Member states would have the option of exempting household use of electricity, gas and coal as well as charities from all taxes.

All coal used for electricity generation, as a chemical reductant, in electrolysis, and in the lime, cement, glass, and ceramics production would be exempt from taxation.  Member states where natural gas provides less than 15 per cent of final energy consumption could exempt it for up to ten years.  Electricity from cogeneration and renewables could likewise be exempt.

Frits Bolkestein, EU internal market commissioner, criticized the proposal as "A gruyere cheese with too many holes".

Source: Environment Daily 1211, 07/05/02

EU clears the CO2 hurdle

The European Union's long-standing commitment to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) at their 1990 level by 2000 has materialized, despite the fact that emissions had increased in that last year.

Emissions of CO2 from all 15 EU member states were 0.5 per cent  lower in 2000 than 10 years earlier. On the other hand EU emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases rose between 1999 and 2000, the latest year for which data for the whole eu are available. About 80 per cent of the unions greenhouse-gas emissions is CO2.

By latest count, in 2000 the total EU emissions of greenhouse-gases were 3.5 per cent below their 1990 level. In 1999 they had been 3.8 per cent lower.

Under the Kyoto protocol the EU is required to cut its combined emissions of the six gases to 8 per cent below their 1990 level by the years 2008-2012.

 

Source: European Environment Agency.

Back to top

News in brief

US supports new IPCC chair

By a vote of 76 to 49 Dr BK Pachauri, economist and technologist, has been elected chairman of the un panel of experts on climate (ipcc) in place of Robert Watson, the atmospheric chemist. Pachauri's candidature was strongly supported by the developing countries, but also by the us, where  the auto and oil industries had been exercising strong pressure on the Bush administration to get Watson removed. Watson has been one of the foremost proponents of the thesis that all the world's countries will have to cut down their emissions of carbon dioxide, in which he has had strong support from ipcc scientists.

Commenting on the shift, Harlan Watson, the chief us negotiator on climate matters, asserted that it would make the developing countries more inclined to take part in the proceedings - adding that it was also timely in view of the fact that the scientific phpect of the climate problem would recede somewhat into the background during the coming negotiations, which will be more concerned with political measures and technical solutions. But he also insisted that there is still great uncertainty as to the extent to which man-made emissions are contributing to global warming.

Canada tergiversating on Kyoto protocol

Canada is now raising new objections to ratifying the Kyoto protocol to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases. At a meeting with eu government representatives in May, the Canadian prime minister, Jean Chrétien, said certain  phpects of the protocol would have to be clarified before Canada could ratify it.

Canada wants to count its exports of hydro power and natural gas to the us as part of its commitment to cut back emissions, citing the flexible mechanisms rule. It argues that these exports, by making it unnecessary  for the us to use so much coal,  enable it to emit so much less carbon dioxide.

Like all other industrialized countries with the exception of the us, Canada signed the protocol last autumn, but the government has since been under strong pressure from the country's energy generators not to ratify. It had in any case already managed to get its vast forests counted as carbon sinks.

The eu is now definitely refusing to allow Canada any further opportunities for making swaps  instead of reducing emissions.

Butterflies good indicators of global warming

Butterflies have increased their range up to 200 km northwards both  in North America, and mosses have started to grow on previously bare ground in the Antarctic. And 16 per cent of all the coral reefs in the world have died as a result of record-high temperatures in coastal waters. According to a study published in Nature, the effect of global warming are already evident, and can be seen all over the world, from the polar regions to tropical seas.

Butterflies, it says, are a good indicator of change, since they move about easily and can adapt their choice of biotope to the climate. The early arrival of spring is an effect of global warming that can be seen everywhere. In Britain the first butterflies are coming out on an average six days earlier than they did seventy years ago.

Source: Nature, vol. 416, p. 38.

Cleaner diesel trucks in USA

Following a court decision in May, a new regulation is to be introduced, starting in 2006, to lower the sulphur content in diesel fuel and reduce emissions of air pollutants from diesel-fuelled trucks and buses. The proposal was challenged in court by a coalition of trucking and oil industry groups. This new EPA regulation requires the sulphur content in diesel fuel is to be reduced from the current level of 500 ppm to 15 ppm. The new standards will also significantly reduce the emissions of small particulates.

Source: Environmental News Service, May 7, 2002.

 

Not so good as sinks

Forests will not be such effective carbon sinks as has been thought and hoped, says a group researchers at Duke University, North Carolina. Previous attempts to assess the ability of forests to bind carbon had  been made in enclosed surroundings such as greenhouses. These last tests were carried out in natural forest, with trees that were allowed to grow in an atmosphere where the concentrations of carbon dioxide had been raised artificially to levels likely to prevail in 2050.

The experiments showed that trees growing in an atmosphere with more carbon dioxide do indeed bind extra carbon, but not as much as previous tests have seemed to indicate. The trees in the Duke University experiment actually bound 27 per cent more carbon than others growing in an atmosphere with today's CO2 concentrations. If the trees in all the world's temperate forests should react similarly to a rise in concentrations, they would bind no more than 10 per cent of the man-made emissions. "The result throws doubt on nations such as the US that have carbon sequestration as their only strategy for dealing with the problem," says William Schlesinger, leader of the Duke research project.

Source: New Scientist No. 2338/202,  Nature 116, p.617.

Linking small particles to lung cancer

Long-term exposure to fine particles (PM2.5) significantly raises the risk of dying from lung cancer and heart disease, according to a study published in the March issue of  the Journal of the American Medical Association, in which data was analyzed from some 500,000 adults whose cases were followed from 1982 to 1998. The number of lung cancer deaths was found to have increased by eight per cent for every additional 10 micrograms (mg) of fine particles per cubic metre of air, while deaths from other heart- and lung related causes increased by six per cent for every 10-microgram rise. While annual average levels of fine particles have come down in US cities over the last twenty years, the study shows that current levels are still high enough to be associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer and cardio-pulmonary deaths.

Sources: Associated Press and Environmental News Service, March 6, 2002.

Thousands die from power plant emissions

Air pollution from some eighty power plants in the Midwest and southeastern United States are blamed for causing almost 6,000 premature deaths every year, according to a study prepared by Abt Associates for the Rockefeller Family Fund, who also estimated that pollutants from these plants lead to 140,000 asthma attacks and 14,000 cases of acute bronchitis each year. The study focuses on power plants run by eight utilities that have all been cited by the US Environment Protection Agency (EPA) for violations of the Clean Air Act. Under the Clinton administration, the EPA started enforcement actions against them because they had modified or upgraded their old, coal-burning plants without installing modern pollution control equipment, as required by the New Source Review provision of the Clean Air Act. According to the Natural Resources Defence Council, internal EPA documents released earlier this year show that the Bush administration has plans to weaken the NSR provisions. The study is available at the Rockefeller Family Fund.

 

Natural disasters increasing

The declining environmental quality of planet Earth, and the apparent increase in the strength and frequency of natural hazards such as cyclones, floods and drought are making peoples ever more vulnerable to food insecurity, ill health and unsustainable livelihoods.

These are some of the findings from the un Environment Programme's Global Environment Outlook-3 (geo-3) report. Behind nearly all the assessments and forecasts outlined in it lies the spectre of global warming and its potential to wreak havoc on weather patterns over the coming decades.

The number of people affected by disasters is estimated to have risen from an average of 147 million a year in the 1980s to 211 million in the nineties.

According to the geo-3 great deal of environmental change has taken place in the thirty years since the Stockholm conference in 1972. Generally the environment has been undergoing a steady decline, especially in large parts of the developing world.

Source: UNEP

Back to top

 
 

Editorial
Get on with it!

European Union

Bunker fuels: Sulphur restrictions underway

Portugal: Environmental performance disappointing

EU news in brief

Climate change
Climate negotiations: The quest for equity

Environmentalists rage over Bush's "Clear Skies" plan

Solar energy: Could possibly cover a quarter of world need

Miscellaneous

Acidification UK: Signs of recovery now starting

UK emissions decreasing

China: Rapid ecomic growth may lead to doubling of emissions

Experts outline global motor vehicle policy

News in brief

 
 

The Secretariat To Main Page