|
|
|
No. 3, June 1996
EDITORIAL
Need to act quickly
BELATEDLY, the European Commission has just put before the member
states its first draft for a revision of the directive for controlling
the emissions of sulphur and nitrogen oxides from large combustion
plants. An account of the Commission's proposals is given in an
article on page 6 of this issue. It is now highly important, in view
of the continuing effects of air pollution, to arrive at a new
directive with all speed.
Still more important, however, is that it should set emission
limits that will really bring about reductions. The requirements for
new plants should moreover be such as will hasten forward technical
improvements, in the same manner as the Californian standards for
vehicle emissions. The tendency in Europe has in effect been to freeze
developments, by opting for emission limits that merely reflect
existing techniques - thereby fixing them as standard for many years
to come. The currently applicable LCP directive is a prime example of
this tendency, having set requirements that are actually lower than
those that had been adopted in Germany already at the beginning of the
eighties. In other words, it calls for the available technology that
was "best" fifteen years ago.
The requirements should instead progress in two or three stages,
becoming gradually stricter during a period of ten years or so. The
emission limits prescribed under Stage 1 should correspond to the
results that can be obtained through use of the best technology that
is now commercially available. Examples can be found in the
Secretariat's publication, Large Combustion Plants - Revision of
the 1988 EC directive.
The requirements should then be made successively stricter in the
following stages, and meeting them will probably call either for new
technical developments, or, in some cases, a switching of fuel from
coal and oil to natural gas and biofuels.
To encourage a more efficient use of energy and conservation of
resources the limits should be expressed as grams of pollutant per
unit of output of useful energy. Since the aim of the directive is
moreover to put a stop to the damage caused by emissions, the
requirements should not vary from one type of fuel to another, thus
giving artificial support to the environmentally worse types of fuel.
It is likewise highly debatable whether the requirements should vary
according to plant size.
To bring about appreciable reductions in the short term it will now
be necessary to turn attention to existing plants. The proposal for
national ceilings covering existing as well as new plants, which has
now been put forward, is admirable and should be adopted. Although it
is difficult to indicate the exact levels for the different countries'
emission ceilings, there is some guidance to be had from the
critical-load limits that have been worked out under the Convention on
Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution. It would be reasonable to
expect the energy sector to accept liability at least for its own
activities, in line with other sectors.
In general there is an obvious need to make the emission limits
apply to existing plants as well as to new ones. In the draft for the
new directive it is proposed to introduce emission requirements for
existing plants by 2007. While time for conversion will doubtless be
needed, five or six years should however suffice.
A combination of command-and-control with economic instruments,
such as charges or taxes on emissions, will probably be the best
solution if the needed reductions are to be achieved in a
cost-effective manner and within a reasonable time.
PER ELVINGSON
Back to top
GREAT BRITAIN
Break in the clouds
Britain's refusal to ratify the 1985 sulphur protocol earned it the
epithet of "the dirty man of Europe." In the event however
it met the requirements of that protocol with some margin.
DURING MOST OF the eighties Great Britain was the great hanger-back
among nations aiming to curb emissions of air pollutants - refusing
both to sign the sulphur protocol under the Convention on Long Range
Transboundary Air Pollution in 1985 and scrounging advantages under
the EC directive on large combustion plants three years later. Now
however HM Inspectorate of Pollution has announced emission limits for
power plants that go well beyond the requirements of these
international agreements.
Under the EC Directive on Large Combustion Plants of 1988, Great
Britain was to reduce its emissions of sulphur dioxide from plants
with a capacity of 50 MWth or more by 40 per cent in 1998 and 60 per
cent by 2003, from the levels of 1980. By signing a later protocol
under the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution, in
1994, it undertook to lower the emissions of sulphur by 50 per cent by
2000, 70 per cent by 2005, and 80 per cent by 2010, again from the
1980 baseline. See AN 4/94, pp. 10-11.
Following accession to the EC directive, a national plan was
evolved to indicate how compliance was to take place. It was expected
that it would require equipment of flue-gas desulphurization to be
installed on 12 GW of the country's coal-fired capacity. But the
only plants so fitted have been Drax, 4 GW, and Ratcliffe, 2 GW.
The new requirements set by HMIP are traceable to the Environmental
Protection Act of 1990, which led to the large power plants being
brought under IPC, integrated pollution control. Subsequent
discussions between HMIP and the two big power generators in England
and Wales, National Power and PowerGen, have resulted in a package of
reductions for existing plants. The outcome of the long-drawn-out
negotiations has proved unexpectedly favourable from the point of view
of the environment.
Each plant has been set two annual limits for SO2 emissions, which
in most cases become successively stricter in 1999 and 2001. The "A limits," which may not be exceeded, have been set with
regard to the local effects on the environment, and are tougher for
plants such as Fiddlers Ferry that are contributing relatively greatly
to the exceeding of the critical loads for acid depositions in their
neighbourhood.
The "B limits" are stricter than the A limits and may be
exceeded in the case of individual plants, but the companies may not
exceed the sum of their B limits. It is expected that similar demands
will be made of generators in Scotland and Northern Ireland, since it
is hardly likely that the owners of plants in England and Wales will
accept discrimination.
Reduction of the sulphur dioxide emissions will now go far beyond
what is required under the LCP directive. At worst, if other
generators, including those in Scotland and Northern Ireland, should
merely keep emissions within their quotas under the National Plan, the
UK will still have met the required 60-per-cent reduction in 1999,
four years ahead of schedule. By 2003, its LCP emissions will have
fallen by at least 78 per cent from their 1980 level.
The prospects are good, too, in respect of the sulphur protocol of
1994. The curbs on National Power and PowerGen alone will enable the
2000 target to be met, and that of 2005 very nearly, even if the
emissions from other than LCP sources should remain at the 1993 level.
The authorization terms should bring noticeable improvements to the
environment. HMIP expects the peak annual mean concentration of SO2 to
fall from 60-70 ug/m3 to below 10 ug/m3 over most of the UK as a
result of the new requirements and "likely" reductions from
other sources.
Moreover the area of the country where critical loads are being
exceeded should fall by 43,000 sq. kilometres, or 43 per cent. If
reductions from other sources were also taken into account, including
those from the continent, the area would shrink by 68 per cent.
Subsequent improvements would, according to HMIP, have to depend on
measures taken on the continent - implying an entirely new situation
for Great Britain, where until quite recently 80 per cent of the
deposition of sulphur came from the country's own emissions.
The new, much stricter, requirements must be seen in relation to a
general retreat from coal. The two big generators were already getting
well below their emissions quotas under the National Plan (which was
started to meet the requirements of the EC directive of 1988). The
reasons are to be found partly in the improved performance of nuclear
plants, partly in the introduction of combined-cycle gas turbines.
In future the power generators will probably operate their coal and
oil-fired plants mostly to relieve peak loads during short periods of
time, and gradually phase them out in favour of new, gas-fired plants.
More low-sulphur coal may also be imported. But unless there is a
marked increase in the price of natural gas, or nuclear plants have to
be suddenly decommissioned, there are not likely to be any further
installations for flue-gas desulphurization.
The authorizations for National Power and PowerGen also include
requirements for other pollutants. Annual limits have been set for the
emissions of NOx from individual plants in 1999, based on what is
assumed to be possible of achievement with low-NOx burners - with
stricter limits for 2001 to meet "relevant air quality
standards." No ceilings have however been set for the generators'
total emissions of this pollutant, so that the overall reduction will
depend on how they choose to deal with sulphur dioxide. HMIP estimates
that NOx emissions from the power industry as a whole will have fallen
by 35 to 47 per cent by 2001-2005.
Further reductions may be expected for plants that are likely to
retain a relatively high load factor. It may be noted here that
several EU member countries have much stricter requirements in regard
to NOx emissions from large combustion plants than are now being
introduced in Britain, meaning that they must have catalytic cleaning
of the flue gases (which can reduce emissions by as much as 80-90 per
cent).
As regards particulates, HMIP has required both companies to submit
proposals for reduction of their emissions to below 50 mg/m3 by 2001. This should, according to HMIP, result in a halving of the
overall emissions of particulates from power stations.
The generators must, in addition, by October this year produce a
review of each plant's effect on local air quality. By 1997 they
will also be expected to implement procedures to reduce their plants'
contributions to poor air quality under adverse meteorological
conditions.
Andrew Farmer, English Nature's expert on acidification, welcomes
the new authorizations as a "very significant step beyond
previous policy constraints," adding however that the improvement
will not be as great for Sites of Special Scientific Interest as for
the country as a whole.
PER ELVINGSON
Source: ENDS Report 254. March 1996.
Back to top
LCP EMISSIONS
Standards shown to be too easily met
WHAT ARE the emission levels that can be achieved with a fairly
efficient large combustion plant of the conventional type? It is
pertinent to put the question, because the plants for the generation
of electricity and heat are responsible for a large part of the
emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in Europe, and a
revision of the limits to the emissions from new as well as existing
plants is now under way within the European Union.
A study* that has recently been commissioned by the Secretariat
shows that there are already plants in operation that easily meet both
the present and proposed EU requirements. The data for the study was
selectively collected from countries where the best plants (from the
environmental point of view) were likely to be found - i.e. those
with the toughest national legislation. Since the aim was simply to
reveal some of the best plants the findings must not be taken to be
representative of a majority of the European plants.
Plants for combined heat and power were included as well as plants
for the production of electricity only. The sizes varied, from about
100 to 2000 megawatt, as did the types of fuel. Although most of the
plants were coal-fired, using lignite as well as hard coal, there were
also some burning oil, natural gas, and biofuels.
Emissions were measured only in respect to air pollutants, and to
enable comparisons to be made they have been assessed as sulphur and
nitrogen oxides in relation to the energy content of the fuel on the
one hand and the output of useful energy on the other. Although
somewhat unusual, the latter type of assessment is better from the
point of view of effects on the environment because it gives extra
points to plants that use energy most effectively.
Figures for the ten best of the thirty plants in the study,
expressed as the sum of the sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, range
from 36 to 119 milligrams per megajoule (mg/MJ) of energy output, or
putting it alternatively, from 32 to 66 mg/MJ of fuel input.
In the EU directive as well as in many countries' legislation the
emissions are expressed as milligrams of pollutant per cubic metre of
air (mg/m3) in the flue gases. Put in that way the figures for the ten
best plants would be 85-175 mg(SO2+ NOx)/m3. That is several times
lower than the limits in the present EU directive, and also
considerably lower (less than half) than those proposed for a revised
directive.
The new limits are supposed to apply for new plants as from 1999.
It should however be noted that in the legislation the limits for SO2 and NOx apply separately, making attainment more difficult than if
they are lumped together, so comparison is not altogether fair.
The study lists plant and emissions data from altogether thirty
units in five countries. The plants are ranked in order of their
emissions as calculated above, and the ten best ones according to
their emissions in relation both to fuel input and output of useful
energy. It is perhaps worthy of note that the same plant came out best
on both counts, and it is one burning coal.
That plant is a combined heat-and-power unit with conventional
firing - fitted for wet-dry flue-gas desulphurization, and with a
low-NOx burner and selective catalytic reduction for reducing the
emissions of nitrogen oxides. The main driving force behind these very
low emissions is said to have been the tax on sulphur emissions and
the charge on NOx that have now been in force in Sweden for several
years.
In a word, the study shows it to be quite possible, by using only
conventional technology, to achieve emission levels that are
considerably lower than required by the EU standards or most countries'
national legislation.
CHRISTER ÅGREN
*Doing more than required. Plants that are showing the way.
By A-K Hjalmarsson, ÅF-Energikonsult Stockholm AB. No. 6 in the
Secretariat's Air Pollution and Climate Series. Available in pdf
format from our publications page.
Emissions in relation to energy input.
| |
Plant |
Type1 |
Fuel |
Country |
mg (SO2+ NO2)/MJ energy input |
| 1. |
Västerås 4. Västerås Stads Kraftvärmeverk |
CHP |
Coal |
Sweden |
32 |
| 2. |
Gersteinwerke B/C, F/G/H/I. VEW |
P |
Natural gas |
Germany |
35 |
| 3. |
Ingolstadt 3. Bayernwerk |
P |
Oil |
Germany |
41 |
| 3. |
Korneuburg 2. Verbundkraft |
P |
Natural gas |
Austria |
41 |
| 5. |
Eemshaven, EC-3/4/5. EPON |
P |
Natural gas |
Netherlands |
45 |
| 6. |
Västerås 1-2. Västerås Stads Kraftvärmeverk |
CHP |
Coal |
Sweden |
46 |
| 7. |
Ingolstadt 4. Bayernwerk |
P |
Oil |
Germany |
50 |
| 7. |
Händelöverket P13. Norrköpings Energi |
CHP |
Biofuel |
Sweden |
50 |
| 9. |
Mellach. STEWAG |
CHP |
Coal |
Austria |
64 |
| 10. |
Idbäcksverket. Nyköpings Energi AB |
CHP |
Biofuel |
Sweden |
66 |
1 P = Power plant. CHP = Combined heat-and-power.
Emissions in relation to output of useful energy.
| |
Plant |
Type1 |
Fuel |
Country |
mg (SO2+NO2)/MJ useful energy2 |
| 1. |
Västerås 4. Västerås Stads Kraftvärmeverk |
CHP |
Coal |
Sweden |
36 |
| 2. |
Västerås 1-2. Västerås Stads Kraftvärmeverk |
CHP |
Coal |
Sweden |
53 |
| 3. |
Händelöverket P13. Norrköpings Energi |
CHP |
Biofuel |
Sweden |
57 |
| 4. |
Korneuburg, Block 2. Verbundkraft |
P |
Natural gas |
Austria |
69 |
| 5. |
Idbäcksverket. Nyköpings Energi AB |
CHP |
Biofuel |
Sweden |
72 |
| 6. |
PFBC, Värtaverket. Stockholm Energi |
CHP |
Coal |
Sweden |
80 |
| 7. |
Eemshaven, EC-3/4/5. EPON |
P |
Natural gas |
Netherlands |
81 |
| 8. |
Gersteinwerke B/C, F/G/H/I. VEW |
P |
Natural gas |
Germany |
92 |
| 9. |
Ingolstadt, 3. Bayernwerk |
P |
Oil |
Germany |
117 |
| 10. |
Mellach. STEWAG |
CHP |
Coal |
Austria |
119 |
1 P = Power plant. CHP = Combined heat-and-power.
2 Useful energy is the sum of the net electricity output and
heat for district heating.
Conversion factors
| |
Fuel |
Factor |
| mg S/MJfuel |
Coal |
5.4 mg SO2/Nm3 1) |
| Oil |
7.1 mg SO2/Nm3 2) |
|
Natural gas |
7.4 mg SO2/Nm3 2) |
| Biofuels |
5.3 mg SO2/Nm3 1) |
| mg NO2/MJfuel |
Coal |
2.7 mg NO2/Nm3 1) |
| Oil |
3.6 mg NO2/Nm3 2) |
| Natural gas |
3.7 mg NO2/Nm3 2) |
| Biofuels |
2.6 mg NO2/Nm3 1) |
1) 6 % O dry gas at normal temperature and pressure.
2) 3 % O dry gas at normal temperature and pressure.
Back to top
LCP DIRECTIVE
Revision now under way
IN APRIL the European Commission presented a first draft - much
delayed - for revision of the 1988 directive for controlling
emissions from large combustion plants.1 It should have made a report
to the Council as long ago as 1994, "accompanied where necessary
by proposals for a revision of the national reduction targets for
emissions from existing plants." It should also have submitted
proposals for a revision of emission limits for new plants at the
latest by July 1995.
The 1988 directive applies to combustion plants with a thermal
input of 50 MW (MWth) or more, irrespective of the type of fuel used.
It consists of two main parts, the one aiming at a gradual reduction
of the emissions of pollutants from existing plants (pre-1987), and
the other prescribing limit values for emissions from new ones. The
emissions of sulphur dioxide from existing plants were to be reduced
by about 57 per cent by 2003, and those of nitrogen oxides by 30 per
cent by 1998 (average for the member countries), from the levels of
1980.
A key phrase running through the subsequent discussions has been
Best Available Technique, or BAT - for the simple reason that it
must be decided what the best available technique is, before emission
limits can be set for new plants. The levels at which these limits are
set will be of even greater importance in the new directive than they
were before, since it is likely that as a result of the awaited IPPC
directive (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) they will be
indicative of the limits starting in 2007 for existing plants.
The limits discussed in April varied, as in the 1988 directive,
according both to the size of plant and the type of fuel. Somewhat
oversimplified, this means that the larger the plant the stricter
would be the requirements (the limits lower), and that the limit
values would be lowest (the requirements most stringent) for gas but
higher for oil and highest for coal.
Some examples. In the present directive the figure for a coal-fired
plant of more than 500 MWth is 400 milligrams of sulphur dioxide per
cubic metre (mg SO2/m3) of flue gas, and 2000
mg/m3 for one between 50
and 100 MWth. In the range from 100 to 500 MWth the limits go from
2000 to 400 mg/m3 in linear descent. (A more detailed description of
the directive will be found in one of the Secretariat's
publications.2)
The April draft called for toughening of the requirements. The
limits for coal-fired plants were for instance to be 200 mg SO2/m3 and
200 mg NOx/m3 for plants larger than 300 MWth, and 200 to 600 mg
SO2/m3 (linear rise) for those between 300 and 100 MWth, and 400 mg
NOx/m3. For plants from 100 down to 50 MWth the limits would be 600 mg
SO2/m3 and 400 mg NOx/m3.
It is obvious that these limits are neither especially stringent
nor in line with the best available technique - no matter whether
they are for coal, oil, or gas-fired plants. With modern
flue-gas-cleaning and firing techniques, markedly lower emission
values can be obtained. From a limited survey that the Secretariat has
had made of some of the better European combustion plants (see article above), it has turned out that at least ten of the existing plants are
already attaining emission levels that are less than half of those
proposed for new plants as from 1999.
Once again a number of exceptions are proposed. The emission
requirements should for instance be more lenient for plants that are
mainly intended for relieving peak loads, which would mean such as are
operated for less than 2200 hours a year. Spain would be granted a
temporary exemption for some of its large new plants, and plants
burning indigenous lignite could also expect favourable treatment.
Proposals for national ceilings on emissions are also to be found
in the draft, but differing from those in the 1988 directive in that
they are intended to apply for new as well as existing plants. It is
proposed, too, to make 1990 the base year instead of 1980. While
eleven of the member states would have to reduce their emissions of
sulphur dioxide by 30 per cent by 2005 and 60 per cent by 2010,
compared with 1990, Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland would be
allowed to make lower reductions. The proposed reductions for nitrogen
oxides would, in the case of most countries, be 20 per cent by 2005
and 40 per cent by 2010, but here again less for the four countries
that would be let off lightly in respect of sulphur dioxide.
Screwing down the ceilings equally for most countries, while at the
same time making 1990 the base year, is considered highly
controversial, since it would punish those countries that had made
reductions in the eighties and favour others that had not been so
diligent. The countries that had made advances include, besides the
Scandinavian, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France. The less
diligent ones have been Great Britain, Spain, and Greece.
A new item in the draft is a proposal to impose minimum
requirements for energy efficiency in future plants, the primary aim
being to curb emissions of carbon dioxide. As in the case of emission
limits, the requirements would be more stringent for large plants than
for smaller ones.
Some of the member countries have maintained that revision of the
directive should be postponed until after the Commission has completed
its proposal for an overall strategy to deal with acidification,
supposedly in the first half of 1997. Others reply that the revision
has already been so much delayed that any further lagging would be
unacceptable, not least in view of what is happening to the
environment.
It is expected that the Commission will be arranging a new meeting
with the member countries early in September to continue the
discussions.
PER ELVINGSON
1 Council Directive of 24 November 1988 on the limitation of
emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion
plants (88/609/EEC).
2 Lundberg, F. & Ågren, C. (1995). Large combustion plants - Revision of the 1988 EC directive. Air Pollution and Climate
Series No. 5. The Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain.
Back to top
PROPOSED DIRECTIVE
Squeezed from two sides
IN EXPECTATION of a proposal from the European Commission for new
vehicle emission limits and fuel quality standards at the end of June,
a group of environmentalist bodies called a conference in Brussels
early in May. The Commission had been expected first to propose
standards for fuel qualities and emission limits for light vehicles,
and to present further requirements for heavy vehicles, and for
vehicle inspection and maintenance, later. The intention has been to
make all of them applicable as from the year 2000.
At the NGO conference Patrick Murphy from the Commission's
environmental directorate said that the full package, together with
other measures already taken or planned, would lead to reductions of
70 per cent, between 1990 and 2010, in the total emissions of nitrogen
oxides and volatile organic compounds from vehicles, and at the same
time a drop of 65 per cent in vehicles' total emissions of
particulates.
A draft for a fuel-quality directive that was leaked in May
contained a proposal to prohibit leaded petrol from January 1, 2000.
In many other respects however this draft was weaker than the one
presented to the member states in December 1995 (see AN 1/96, p.6).
For one thing the limit for the sulphur content of petrol had become
0.02 per cent as against 0.01 per cent in the December draft, and for
another the allowance for aromatic hydrocarbons was proposed to be 45
per cent (which would be higher than the present EU average). The
limit for benzene, which is a carcinogenic substance, was to be 2 per
cent, only slightly lower than the current market average of around
2.5 per cent.
Since the intention of the directive is to act for European
harmonization, those countries that wish to use fiscal means to
encourage the use of cleaner fuels still further may do so, but may
not introduce stricter limits than those set in the directive.
At the Brussels conference a Commission officer explained that the
reason the fuel-quality requirements had been made more lenient was
the poor financial state of the oil companies and their consequent
inability to shoulder the necessary investments.
As regards passenger cars, the matter most discussed has been the
emission-limit value for NOx from diesel-engined vehicles. It seems
the Commission has accepted the car makers' argument that it would
be impossible to get down to the level of 0.37 g NOx/km, as proposed
in the December draft, by the year 2000. It is not clear however
whether it intends to stick to the alternative figure of 0.45 g/km
that it then proposed as a compromise, or give way to the car makers'
protests and soften the limit to 0.50 g/km.
The draft directive, which really should have been presented in
December 1994, is the outcome of an extensive three-year study carried
out jointly by the Commission and the trade associations for car and
oil industries. The aim of the study had been to try and identify the
most cost-effective measures to achieve the future EU air quality
standards by 2010.
The study, or Auto-Oil Programme as it was called, has been heavily
criticized by environmentalist NGOs, none of which have been allowed
to participate. Among the phpects especially attacked have been the
cost-benefit analyses, which are considered to have systematically
underestimated the cost of the deleterious effects of air pollution on
health and environment, while at the same time heavily overestimating
the costs to industry of rectification.
It is generally believed that what will now follow will be lengthy
and complicated discussions both within the council of ministers, and
between the council and the European parliament. A spokesman from the
Commission has said that he did not expect any of the proposed
legislation to be passed into law before mid-1998.
PER ELVINGSON
Sources: Environment Watch: W. Europe. May 17, 1996. T&E
Bulletin. May 1996.
Back to top
EU CO2 EMISSIONS
Risk of an increase
THERE APPEARS to be every probability that the European Union will
fail to freeze its emissions of carbon dioxide at 1990 levels by the
year 2000, to judge by a report from the Commission (COM(96)91). If
the national programs for energy saving do not succeed, emissions may
have risen by as much as 5 per cent by 2000.
The report reveals that the emissions of carbon dioxide from the
fifteen member countries amounted in 1990 to 3285 million tons.
Germany alone was responsible for almost a third of that total.
Since 1990 the German emissions have however fallen - largely on
account of what has happened in eastern Germany, where the emissions
were halved between 1987 and 1993. Otherwise it was only in Great
Britain and Austria that energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide
declined between 1990 and 1993. The result for the EU as a whole was a
reduction from such sources of 2.2 per cent during that time.
The emission figures in the table, from the EU statistical office,
Eurostat, were published some time after the Commission's report had
come out. They show a continued fall in the energy-related emissions
of CO2, bringing the reduction of the EU total to 2.7 per cent between
1990 and 1994. As can also be seen, three more countries - France,
Italy, and Luxembourg - reported reductions.
One sector where emissions have continued to increase is
transportation, with an increase of 7.6 per cent between 1990 and
1994. The most rapid rise was for aviation, which increased its
emissions 13.3 per cent. Transportation now accounts altogether for 26
per cent of the CO2 emissions in the EU.
There is a warning in the Commission's report against
entertaining false hopes regarding the Union's possibility of
achieving a freeze by 2000. The drop so far in emissions is due
largely, it says, to the economic recession, less burning of lignite
in eastern Germany, and a switch from coal to gas in Great Britain. If
economic growth takes off again, as the Commission hopes and believes
it will, there will be a risk of an increase in emissions too. The
International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates, on the basis of the
member countries' own forecasts, that the Union emissions of CO2 from the energy sector will show an increase of 6 per cent between
1990 and 2000.
The members' estimates do not however tell quite the same story.
Five of them are counting on reducing their total emissions of carbon
dioxide during the period, four expect to freeze them, and six think
theirs will increase. The overall result would be a reduction of 1 per
cent.
But the Commission remains unimpressed. In six cases the figures
given presuppose the imposition of an EU tax on energy and/or carbon
dioxide - which hardly seems imminent. "It cannot be
excluded," it says, "that Community emissions will increase
within the range of 0 to 5 per cent by 2000 over 1990 levels."
The environment commissioner Ritt Bjerregaard comments that it
would be absurd if "with present efforts, we shall only meet our
CO2 target if the growth rate turns out to be lower than we hope and
expect it to be." If only less energy is wasted, she says,
reduced emissions need not to be incompatible with economic growth.
Source: ENDS Report 255. April 1996.
Emissions of carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels. Million
tons.
| |
1990 |
1994 |
Change |
| Austria |
58 |
57 |
-2% |
| Belgium |
111 |
117 |
+6% |
| Denmark |
53 |
63 |
+19% |
| Finland |
53 |
61 |
+14% |
| France |
368 |
349 |
-5% |
| Germany |
992 |
897 |
-10% |
| Greece |
73 |
78 |
+7% |
| Ireland |
31 |
32 |
+3% |
| Italy |
402 |
393 |
-2% |
| Luxembourg |
12 |
12 |
-3% |
| Netherlands |
157 |
164 |
+5% |
| Portugal |
40 |
45 |
+14% |
| Spain |
209 |
229 |
+10% |
| Sweden |
52 |
56 |
+8% |
| UK |
579 |
550 |
-5% |
| EU total |
3,188 |
3,103 |
-2.7% |
Source: Eurostat.
Back to top
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
Gives no boost to the economy
GREAT BRITAIN and Sweden are among the countries whose governments
have of late been cutting back on expensive road building programs.
This has been partly for budgetary reasons, but also because of a
growing realization that the circumstances for infrastructural
development have now significantly changed.
A strong belief in the beneficent effects of road building still
persists however within the European Union. Assertions that it will
help to invigorate economic growth and increase employment can still
be found in documents such as the Guidelines for the Trans-European
Networks (TENs) and the White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness and
Employment. Even as late as last April the EU transport commissioner,
Neil Kinnock, was telling the ministers of transport that the TENs
program would generate jobs and aid European competitiveness.
But economists are now more and more throwing doubt on the supposed
effects of road building on economic growth. At a seminar in Brussels,
organized last December by the European Federation for Transport and
Environment (T&E) and the Centre for Energy Conservation and
Environmental Technology, four independent economists were asked to
give their views on the matter, and a number of professionals in the
field of European policy were invited to respond.
From the report* on the seminar, issued on April 23, it appears
that there was a remarkable degree of unanimity behind the following
conclusions:
- Calls for a general increase in road investments to achieve
economic goals cannot be justified on scientific grounds.
- A blanket assumption that road building generates long-term
employment cannot be justified on the basis of available evidence.
- There is severe doubt about the effectiveness of road building as
an instrument to improve cohesion.
The report was published just one day before so-called conciliation
negotiations started between the European Parliament and the Council
of Ministers in regard to trans-European transport measures. In a
joint statement the T&E and the World Wide Fund for Nature urged
the Parliament "not to sacrifice environmental provision to
faulty economic logic," adding that the environmental conditions
for the TENs that Parliament has inserted in the guidelines should
ensure a corridor analysis being made for each road project, in order
to find the least-damaging route, as well as providing for a strategic
environmental assessment for the whole TEN system.
The environmentalist organizations insist that each road project
should be judged on its own merits, there being no ground for the
assumption that all road building will be good for the economy. A
proper evaluation should also note what road users would have to pay
if account were taken of all the costs, environmental and social, to
which the project would give rise.
"We fear that the Council is racing ahead and spending money
from the Cohesion and the Structural Funds on roads, but with the
scantiest economic justification," said Tony Long, director of
WWF's European Policy Office. Most of the 3300 million ecus that the
EU spent on road building between 1990 and 1995 came from these funds
- which are primarily intended for stimulating development in
relatively poor regions.
"If decision-makers really want to create growth and
employment they should check all the available options. This is the
very least they can do to ensure that European taxpayers' money is
being well spent and the environment is not being damaged in
vain," added Tony Long.
PER ELVINGSON
* Roads and Economy. T&E Publication 96/1. 52 pp. BEf500. A
six-page summary (T&E 96/6) can be had free of charge. Both are
available from T&E, www.t-e.nu
Back to top
EAST ASIA
Future pollution projected
Note. Maps available in printed
version only.
RAPID ECONOMIC GROWTH in parts of southeast Asia is expected to
considerably worsen the problems connected with air pollution in that
region. According to official sources the use of energy, and with it
the emissions of sulphur dioxide, will treble during the next 20-30
years.
This was the reason for starting the RAINS Asia program 1992,
financed by the World Bank. RAINS (Regional Acidification Information
and Simulation) is a computer model developed by IIASA, the
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, in Vienna. It
has had great practical importance in Europe in the negotiations for
reducing the emissions of sulphur dioxide (see for instance AN 2/96,
pp. 5-6), and it is hoped that through RAINS Asia, policy makers there
will also use the RAINS model as a means of reducing emissions of air
pollutants.
Bringing together scientists from Europe, North America, and Asia
has enabled the model to be adapted to Asian circumstances - which
compared with those in Europe are much more complicated. The area to
be covered is three times as great, and both weather and ecosystems
are more complex. Nor has the geographical distribution of the
emissions, or the sensitivity of the various ecosystems to acid
deposition yet been mapped with any exactness.
The model makes it possible to foresee the likely emissions of
sulphur under various assumptions, where deposition will occur, and
what the effects will be on the environment - now and in future. It
also covers the cost phpect, showing what the reduction of emissions
will cost, country by country.
The greatest fallout of sulphur resulting from present emissions is
shown by the model to occur around Chongqing, a town in the Chinese
province of Sichuan. As in Europe the pollution gets carried across
national borders. While in China's case only 3 per cent of the
country's emissions lands elsewhere (83 per cent stays at home, 14
per cent falls in the sea), that small fraction has a marked effect in
the neighbouring countries. In North Korea and Vietnam, where 0.8 and
0.4 per cent of China's emissions fall, 35 and 22 per cent of the
deposition in those countries comes from China.
It also appears from the model that in large areas of China and
Korea the atmospheric concentrations of sulphur dioxide are exceeding
the limits above which damage can occur to woodlands and field crops.
(The limit is 20-30 ug/m3 as a yearly average.)
The reference scenario used for the calculations assumes a trebling
of energy use in the region between 1990 and 2020, and no measures to
control the emissions of sulphur dioxide (beyond those already decided
upon in Japan and Taiwan, China). The consequence of this official so-called
energy pathway would likewise be an overall trebling of the emissions
of sulphur dioxide, although with considerable variations from country
to country - from a 32-per-cent increase in Japan to a twelvefold
increase in Pakistan (see Table 1). It is estimated that in 2020, 75
per cent of the sulphur will come from the burning of coal, and 20 per
cent from oil. The sector expected to be most responsible for the
increase in emissions would be power generation.
Table 1. Emissions of sulphur dioxide in 1990 and as forecast for 2020 in the reference scenario. (Unit: 1000 tons of SO2).
| |
1990 |
2020 |
Increase |
| Bangladesh |
118 |
524 |
344% |
| Bhutan |
2 |
12 |
500% |
| Brunei |
6 |
18 |
200% |
| Cambodia |
22 |
147 |
568% |
| China |
21908 |
60687 |
177% |
| Hong Kong |
140 |
378 |
170% |
| India |
4471 |
18549 |
315% |
| Indonesia |
630 |
3162 |
402% |
| Japan |
835 |
1120 |
34% |
| Korea, north |
343 |
1345 |
292% |
| Korea, south |
1640 |
5537 |
238% |
| Laos |
3 |
12 |
300% |
| Malaysia |
205 |
409 |
100% |
| Mongolia |
78 |
168 |
115% |
| Myanmar |
18 |
40 |
122% |
| Nepal |
122 |
247 |
102% |
| Pakistan |
614 |
7527 |
1126% |
| Philippines |
390 |
2037 |
422% |
| Singapore |
191 |
1033 |
441% |
| Sri Lanka |
42 |
239 |
469% |
| Taiwan, China |
500 |
1478 |
196% |
| Thailand |
1038 |
4637 |
347% |
| Vietnam |
113 |
654 |
479% |
| Sea lanes |
243 |
511 |
110% |
| Total |
33,674 |
110,477 |
228% |
Depositions will naturally also increase. Over large areas they
will be two to three times greater in 2020 than they are today, while
in certain cases - such as in parts of India, Korea, and Thailand
- they will, according to the model, be five times greater or even
more.
Throughout eastern China and Korea, and in parts of India, the
depositions of sulphur will amount to 20 to 50 kilograms per hectare
per year. By far the highest figures will be seen in China, where they
may run locally to 260 kg/ha per year. See Map 1. It may be noted by
way of comparison that in the "black triangle" of Central
Europe - where eastern Germany, the Czech Republic, and Poland
converge - they have never been more than 150 kg/ha per year.
As in Europe, the assessment of the ecological effects of sulphur
deposition has been based on the critical loads concept. The
sensitivity of the soil to acid deposition has been determined by
noting weathering capacity and other factors. Map 2 shows where the
critical loads would have been exceeded, given the emissions levels of
1990. Since there is a relatively large margin of uncertainty in the
statistics, in making the maps the most sensitive quarter of the
ecosystems in each square (the so-called 25 percentile) has been
excluded. This means that if the critical loads are not exceeded, at
least 75 per cent of the ecosystems in the square will be safe from
acidification. (In Europe it is usually 5 per cent that are excluded.)
The extent to which the critical loads would be exceeded if
emissions in 2020 were in accordance with the reference scenario can
be seen in Map 3. Although the present scientific knowledge does not
allow any conclusions to be drawn as to the environmental damage that
might ensue from the assumed deposition, the fact that the sulphur
falling on large areas is likely to be ten times more than the
critical load should give reason, it is said, for serious concern. The
high concentrations of sulphur dioxide in the air that might be
expected according to this scenario would also affect human health,
not only in towns but also in great parts of the countryside.
There are therefore obvious reasons for reducing emissions. The
question is just how, and at what cost, and RAINS Asia gives answers.
The most expensive way would be to apply the best available
technology (BAT) to all emission sources. In the model set-up that
would mean equipping all large point sources, both new and existing,
for flue-gas desulphurization, and in other cases using only
low-sulphur fuels. This would halve emissions in 2020, compared with
today's figures, despite a trebling in energy use. The greatest
reductions would be of emissions from large combustion plants. Whereas
in China, the Philippines, and Thailand emissions would drop by 60-70
per cent, in India they would increase by 30 per cent, all compared
with 1990.
Under this BAT scenario, depositions would be kept under the
critical loads in most places - as can be seen from Map 4, which
again excludes 25 per cent of the most sensitive ecosystems. There
would still be trouble in parts of China, particularly in Hunan and
Jiangxi provinces, which suffer from a combination of sensitive
ecosystems with high economic activity (and consequently high
emissions). Critical loads would also be exceeded around certain "hot spots" in India, Thailand, and Korea.
The trouble with that scenario is the cost. By 2020 it would have
amounted to US$90 billion a year, corresponding to 0.59 per cent of
the GDP in the region, also assuming the expected economic growth. The
heaviest burden would fall on China, where the cost would come to 1.7
per cent of the GDP. By comparison, the commitments of the European
countries under the 1994 sulphur protocol are estimated to cost them
on an average 0.21 per cent of the gross domestic product.
Since the constraining factor will be money, the aim has been to
unearth strategies that will yield the greatest environmental gain at
the least possible cost.
A solution may lie in a scenario called ACT, Advanced Emission
Control Technology, where flue-gas desulphurization would be installed
only at new large point sources and low-sulphur fuels used in other
cases. While sulphur emissions would then be 50 per cent higher in
2020 than in 1990, they would nevertheless only be half of what they
would have been under the reference scenario. The cost would be
markedly less than that for the BAT scenario - US$39 instead of
US$90 billion in 2020. That would correspond to 0.25 per cent of the
likely GDP, bringing the cost of reduction down to the current
European level.
The increase of 50 per cent in emissions would mean an exceeding of
the critical loads to a greater extent than today (Map 5). Serious
consequences from acidification might therefore be expected in Korea
and most of China.
Both the BAT and the ACT scenarios require industrial technique,
know-how, and investment capital, all of which tend to be in short
supply in developing countries. Hitherto preference has often been
given to technology that has already been available and in use, but it
has been shown by modelling that if for instance simple limestone
injection were used instead of the more advanced flue-gas
desulphurization method, the installation cost would be lower but the
total cost will be higher on account of the higher cost of operation.
Since there will be a lower cleaning effect, too, the emissions of
pollutants would be distinctly higher.
A third way out that has been examined is the local application of
advanced technologies (LACT). Advanced technology would be applied in
ecologically sensitive areas, and less demanding measures elsewhere.
Although the ecosystems would not be so well protected as under ACT,
the total cost with this procedure would be markedly less.
All the scenarios so far described assume a trebling of energy use,
with a similar rise in sulphur emissions. It turns out however that
measures aimed at bringing about a more efficient use of energy would
be definitely more cost-effective than installing flue-gas cleaning.
Emissions would be much lower with a more efficient use of energy -
and so ecosystems would be better protected - and the cost, compared
to the base scenarios, would be 30 per cent lower. See Table
2.
Table 2. Comparison of emissions and emission-control costs for the base-case energy pathway and the energy-efficiency pathway.
| |
Emissions (million tons SO2) |
Costs (billion US$/year) |
| |
Base case |
Efficiency |
Base case |
Efficiency |
| Reference scenario (no further control) |
110.5 |
80.1 |
3.9 |
2.0 |
| Best Available Technology (BAT) |
16.3 |
12.4 |
90.4 |
65.6 |
| Advanced Control Technology (ACT) |
50.4 |
39.1 |
38.8 |
25.5 |
In each of the pathways illustrated in the table there would be the
same growth in GDP, but under the energy efficiency scenario energy
use would no more than double between 1990 and 2020. This scenario
assumes sharp increases in energy prices, general improvements in
technology, and increased use of renewable sources.
Since the RAINS Asia report contains no assessment of the cost of
emissions to society, it gives no help in balancing benefits against
the cost of various scenarios.
In their address to the World Bank the project group points out
that the model is preliminary and still has certain deficiencies. Cost
assessments based on European and North American experience are for
instance not always applicable to Asian circumstances. In order to
better estimate future trends a renewed check should be made of the
actual size of present emissions. It would also be desirable to
include nitrogen oxides in the model, and so the traffic sector.
Nitrogen oxides are not only acidifying, but also contribute to the
eutrophication of ecosystems, and the formation of ground-level ozone.
A long-term aim should be to achieve a comprehensive approach to the
various problems that would also take into account the different
effects of air pollutants on the environment and health.
PER ELVINGSON
RAINS Asia: An assessment model for air pollution in Asia. Edited
by W. Foell, M. Amann, G. Carmichael, M. Chadwick, J-P Hettelingh, L.
Hordijk, and Z. Dianwu. Final report to the World Bank, December 1995.
Further reading on the project can be found in Water, Air, and Soil
Pollution Vol. 85 (1995), pp. 2277-2294, 2565-2570.
Information can also be had from the project's contact person at
the World Bank, Dr J. Shah of the Environment and Social Affairs
Division, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20433, USA.
Back to top
SWEDEN
The "greenest" cars
BUYING A CAR means investing a lot of money. While car makers offer
a profusion of facts about performance, comfort, options, etc., they
remain largely silent as to the environmental phpects. Gröna
Bilister, a Swedish branch of T&E, the European Federation for
Transport and Environment, has therefore now ranked the new 1996
models on sale in Sweden in accordance with their environmental
qualities, and proposed "best buys" in four size classes.
Only models certified as Class 1 or 2 in the Swedish environmental
classification system were admissible for the test. In other words,
the functioning and durability of their exhaust-cleaning systems for
instance had to be guaranteed. The emissions of nitrogen oxides and
volatile organic compounds were then compounded with the consumption
of fuel to form an index. The top-ranking cars were as follows:
Small cars: Hyundai Accent LS/GS/GLS, Volkswagen Polo 1.4i.
Small medium size: Mazda 323 1.5, Volkswagen Golf 1.4i.
Large medium size: Mazda 626 2.0i, Volkswagen Passat CL 1.8i.
Large cars: Opel Omega 2.0i, Volvo 850 GLT2.5.
Further information: Gröna Bilister,
www.gronabilister.se.
Back to top
OZONE
Guide values need to be revised
OZONE IS MORE dangerous than previously believed. The Swedish
Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), which has been studying the
effects of ground-level ozone on human health on behalf of the
national Environmental Protection Agency, is urging in consequence a
marked lowering of the present guide and limit values.
The agency's guide value for ozone is now 150 ug/m3 air as an
hourly average, which the IMM proposes should be almost halved to 80
ug/m3. This would mean bringing it down even further in relation to
the EU guide values.
"There is quite sufficient evidence to show that
concentrations even of 160 ug/m3 can give rise to acute effects, such
as deterioration of lung function. Still higher concentrations can
cause sensitive individuals to be hospitalized or actually die. We
have seen this from a Belgian study," says Katarina Victorin,
project leader for the Swedish one. Her institute, IMM, is
internationally prominent in this field of research, and it was she
who directed the revision of the WHO guidelines for air quality which
have just been adopted and will shortly be published.
Victorin defends the tightening that is recommended for Sweden on
the grounds that a margin of safety is needed in order to protect
groups such as the elderly, children, and allergics.
Because of uncertain scientific evidence, the IMM is not proposing
any guide level for long-time exposure. The proposed hourly value does
however, says Victorin, provide some protection against too high
long-time exposure.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, practically the
whole Swedish population is exposed to concentrations in excess of
both the current and proposed guide values. By far the greater part of
the ozone in the Swedish atmosphere stems however from sources outside
the country. Ground-level ozone in high concentrations is a problem
that is plaguing almost the whole of Europe, and the new findings will
be used by Sweden to press the European Union to take stronger
measures against the emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic
compounds, both substances leading to the formation of ground-level
ozone.
It may be noted, by way of comparison, that the British government's
Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards proposed a couple of years ago
that 50 ppb (which would be 100 ug/m3) should be the standard for any
eight-hour period. The panel thought it could detect a threshold at
about that level, noting that higher concentrations led to significant
increases in mortality rates.
The British expert panel estimated that compliance would require
either cutting the present emissions of VOCs by 75-80 per cent or a
reduction of NOx emissions by 95 per cent, or some compromise between
the two. But attainment of the proposed IMM guide level, with a
one-hour value at a lower figure, would require a much greater
reduction of emissions.
PER ELVINGSON
Note. A report on the IMM study will be published in the
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. A Swedish
summary can be obtained from IMM, entitled: Ozon -
hälsoriskbedömning och förslag till riktvärden (IMM rapport 1/96).
Back to top
HEALTH
Mortality and London air
A FIVE-YEAR STUDY in London has found that more people die when the
levels of ozone and particulates in air are high. The strong link
already established between those air pollutants and adverse health
effects is thus further confirmed.
The study, led by Professor Ross Anderson of St George's
Hospital, looked for correlations between daily mortality and daily
measures of air pollution between 1987 and 1992. The levels of ozone,
particulates (as black smoke), nitrogen dioxide, and sulphur dioxide
were compared with total mortality, and mortality from cardiovascular
and respiratory diseases.
The study found a positive correlation between daily mortality and
higher levels of ozone and black smoke. As regards ozone, the effect
was most pronounced in spring and summer. An increase in eight-hour
ozone levels from 4 to 36 parts per billion (8 to 72 ug/m3) resulted
in an increase in total mortality of 3.5 per cent. For cardiovascular
and respiratory mortality the increases were 3.6 and 5.4 per cent,
respectively.
Black smoke was associated with an increase in total mortality
throughout the year, but in contrast to the findings of some studies
in the United States, links with cardiovascular and respiratory
mortality were not found to be significant. Nevertheless, the size of
the effect was similar to that seen in America - an increase of 10
ug/m3 in black smoke being associated with a 1.1 per cent increase in
mortality.
Source: ENDS Report 254. March 1996. The study appears in BMJ, Vol.
312, pp. 665-669.
Back to top
RUSSIA
New energy policy evolving
RUSSIA IS STILL SUFFERING from the aftermath of the centrally
planned Soviet economy, and not least in the energy sector. But
changes are now in many respects imminent.
The Chernobyl disaster not only hastened the process of
democratization but also gave impetus to the environmentalist movement
and the development of a new energy policy. After the disintegration
of the Soviet Union, bringing a new geopolitical situation and the
beginnings of a market economy in the CIS, it became clear that the
preservation of the status quo in the energy sector would cause the
whole Russian economy to remain uncompetitive in the world market.
This realization led to a review of the country's energy policy,
instigated by the federal government, which culminated in the
publication in 1995 of a comprehensive document, New Energy Policy in
Russia.
The basic aim of Russia's energy policy will now be to create the
necessary conditions for the efficient use of the country's energy
resources and its whole energy industry. It will also be necessary to
improve the quality of the energy services, through greater
reliability for instance in the supply of energy and heat, and better
qualities of motor fuel. There needs further to be an increased use of
gas, especially in rural areas.
The new policy is expected to lead to an amelioration of the
effects of the energy system on the environment, to help Russia's
integration with the world economy and to bring improvement to the
country's economy through exports of energy. It will be important
however to control exports, so as to avoid a shortfall in the internal
market.
The highest priority is to be given to measures for the
conservation and efficient use of energy. Energy conservation should
not only ensure a more rational use of natural resources, but also
lead to gains for the environment - reducing the emissions of
greenhouse and toxic gases, for instance, by 15-20 per cent.
At present there are three main factors hindering energy
conservation:
- Lack of legislation to promote the conservation and efficient use
of energy.
- Uncompleted privatization. Because of the way it was introduced
in Russia, privatization did not lead to any real ownership of
property, hence there is no incentive to save energy and use it more
efficiently.
- The continued subsidizing of inefficient facilities.
The suggested means of forwarding energy conservation include the
creation of conservation funds, the introduction of construction
standards, and appliance certification. It will also be important to
develop programs for educating the public as well as employees in the
energy sector.
The following developments are envisaged for the next 10-15 years
on the supply side:
- Increased use of natural gas, especially in environmentally
sensitive as well as rural areas generally.
- Increased production of electricity from hydro, conventional, and
nuclear installations wherever it is economically and environmentally
of worthwhile.
- Increased use of renewables.
- Modernization of the technologies for the mining and use of coal.
- More intensive use of local resources - hydropower, peat, small
oil and gas fields, and renewables.
Given the present state of the economy, it is likely that the
emphasis will tend to be rather on the reconstruction of existing
plants, energy saving, and the development of new technologies than on
building new plants of high capacity, which require large investments
of capital.
The merging of regional systems for the production and distribution
of electricity and gas into national ones will mean that they will
have to stay under state control. Gas is expected to remain the prime
source of energy during the foreseeable future. It constitutes more
than half of Russia's energy resources, and 35 per cent of all gas
exports from the CIS come from Russia. An increase in domestic
consumption and exports will however require renovation of the
distribution network and the exploitation of new gas finds.
Oil and coal are also important energy sources, but in both cases
the industry is in need of modernization. While the existing nuclear
power plants will be modernized and technically improved during the
next five years, it is unlikely that any new plants will be built
before 2000. But if the public's attitude to nuclear power should
become more favourable, work might be resumed on the construction of
some mothballed reactors.
After 2000, nuclear plants may be built in central and western
Russia, and also in the far east, provided reactors of new design and
improved safety are available. In that case they will be producing
electricity for export as well as for domestic use. Small reactors of
the type used in submarines may be installed in the far north, and
even in the western part of the country and underground.
Considerable use of hydroelectric power is envisaged for some
regions, in particular Siberia, the far east, North Caucasus, and
Kamchatka - the idea being to build many small plants.
De-monopolization is said to be among the first-rank aims of the
new energy policy. It is hoped to attract investment from private
Russian businesses as well as foreign firms and the regional and
federal Russian governments.
Regional energy policies had no place in the Soviet planned
economy. In a market economy however federal and regional policies
must be in consonance if resources are to be used rationally. Federal
policy should take into account the special interests of the regions,
with their strong desire for independence, while yet ensuring a
properly functioning distribution system for the whole country.
In pursuance of this policy the federal government should allow the
regions a larger share in the ownership of the means of production and
a greater influence in planning and management - thus providing a
more tangible incentive for energy conservation and efficiency in its
use, for maintaining reliable supplies and restricting the emissions
of pollutants.
In the oblasts of Tula and Kaliningrad regional specialists are
already cooperating with others in federal academic and state
institutions for the development of regional energy policies. The
regional governments are notably inclined to prefer investments in
projects that can be carried out rather quickly, which explains why
energy conservation is often chosen.
The specific legislation needed for implementation of the new
energy policy is now being worked out by the federal government. It
will lay down the rights and responsibilities of the federal and
regional governments and institutions in respect of strategy and the
market for energy, and management of the installations.
There is nothing in the New Energy Policy document about public
participation in the formulating of energy strategy. The federal law "On Tariffs," which gives energy commissions authority to
develop regional policies, requires public hearings to be held, and
lays down that the commissions shall include at least two members
representing public organizations. This provides an opportunity for
NGOs to become more deeply involved in the development of regional
energy programs, allows for wider public participation in discussions
on energy policy, and public influence in economic matters generally.
LYDIA POPOVA
Center for nuclear ecology and energy policy of the
Socio-Ecological Union, Krupskaja str. 8-1-187, 117311 Moscow, Russia.
As it is now
TODAY'S Russian energy system is characterized by enormous
ineffectiveness. Almost 40 per cent of the fuel and electricity is
being used inefficiently, due to direct losses in the distribution
network and unnecessarily high consumption in end use. The energy
intensity in Russian industry is 2.5-3 times higher than in western
countries. Under the Soviet regime the country's energy production had
been steadily increasing, so that by 1988 it had reached 13 per cent
of the world total, although the population constitutes less than 3
per cent. After the collapse of the Soviet Union the demand for energy
declined, but to a less extent than industrial output, which by 1993
had fallen off by a third since 1990.
The whole energy complex is now in a very poor state. More than
half of the coal-mining machinery, and 30 per cent of the gas-pumping
equipment, has passed the limit of its design age. Within the next
five years all of the country's power plants will also have reached
that stage. And none of the nuclear power plants of Soviet design can
approach world safety standards.
At present the most serious problem for the whole system lies in
non-payment for deliveries of fuel and electricity, which is holding
up the much needed investments. But low energy prices are also a
problem. Although they grew faster in 1993-94 than those for
industrial products as a whole, oil and gas at least were being paid
for at prices far below world levels.
Also making the situation almost critical in the energy sector is
the absence of legislation and proper regulation, combined with poor
management and the lack of incentives to save energy and use it more
efficiently. The tax system is moreover ineffective both for the
economy as a whole and the energy-fuel complex in particular.
In 1994, 67 per cent of the electricity was being generated in
power plants fired with fossil fuels, and 11 per cent in nuclear
plants. In European Russia hydropower answered for 14 per cent of the
electricity output, but as much as 40 per cent in the eastern regions.
The environmental burden of the energy sector consists primarily of
emissions of air pollutants and radioactive substances from power
plants and nuclear fuel production. There are also the problems of
widespread destruction of soil and the contamination of water.
Source: New Energy Policy in Russia |
Back to top
US TRADING PROGRAM
More details now reported
APPRAISALS of the American system of allowance trading to control
emissions of air pollutants continue to appear. One of the most recent
comes from Bernd Schärer of the Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, which
contains more detail than has previously come to the attention of Acid
News.
After describing the antecedents of the system, and its emergence
under the Clean Air Act of 1990, Schärer goes on to outline its known
workings, namely: Certificates are issued to the affected power
plants, each entitling to the emission of one ton of sulphur dioxide
per annum - to a total, Schärer says, corresponding to the
"historical fuel consumption and specific emission factors" of the plant. At the end of each year plants must be able to show
allowance certificates to an amount equal to their emissions quota or
face penalties.
Since the allowances are tradeable, utilities can make
up any deficiency by buying either from other utilities or in the now
established market. Contrariwise those that have been more successful
in keeping down emissions, can sell their excess allowances. Companies
that fail to produce the necessary number of allowances have to pay a
penalty of $2000 per excess ton emitted - which, in view of the
average traded price for an allowance of $200 per ton, Schärer calls
drastic.
Strangely, he omits to say that the EPA aims, through the system,
to have halved emissions by 2010, compared with 1980, as the director
of its Acid Rain Division emphasized in the letter printed in Acid
News 5/95, by issuing allowances only equal to about half the
emissions of that base year. He adds on the other hand a number of
details that did not appear there.
The 110 utilities involved in Phase I of the Acid Rain Program,
starting in 1995, comprise 263 mainly coal-fired blocks in the
twenty-one eastern and middle-western states where most of the coal is
mined. There the sulphur content of the coal is usually more than 3
per cent, but with the emission factor used for the allowances it
would be equivalent to 1.6 per cent. Most of the coal used for power
generation in Germany, Schärer notes, has a sulphur content of 1 to
1.5 per cent.
Phase II, from the year 2000, will bring both a tightening of the
requirements and extension of the coverage to 700 utilities with a
total of 2100 power blocks, so that the program will then apply to all
plants of more than 25 MW capacity. The emission factor will be 1.2
lb/mill. Btu, corresponding to a sulphur content in the fuel of 0.8
per cent.
Schärer also notes that the primary aim of the Clean Air Act is to
reduce the emissions of sulphur dioxide by 10 million tons a year from
the 1980 level, so that on completion of the acid rain program in 2010
the aggregate of SO2 from power plants will be 8.95 million tons a
year, and from other sources 5.6 million tons. The target for NOx
emissions, for which there is no allowance trading, will be 2 million
tons per annum.
Schärer reports that even prior to 1995 more than twenty direct
deals had been made between utilities, with a total value of $20
million. At the first of two auctions at the Chicago Board of Trade,
in 1993, more than 150,000 allowances were sold at prices ranging from
$122 to $450, and at the second in 1994 176,000 allowances exchanged
owners at $140-400 each. He compares this with the reduction cost of
DM2300 per ton of SO2 under GFAVO, the German regulation program for
large combustion plants.
To promote energy efficiency and the use of renewable fuels, the
EPA is keeping a number of allowances in reserve. Utilities that carry
out efficiency measures or go over to using renewable fuels before the
time limit are given bonus allowances corresponding to the extent to
which they have cut back emissions of SO2. These allowances can be
banked or traded just like any others, and some have already been
conferred.
A comparison of the emission factors for SO2 in the Acid Rain
Program with the corresponding limit values in the German regulation
for large combustion plants depends on differences of expression (US:
lb SO2/mill. Btu. Germany: mg SO2/m3). But what is important is the
implied stringency. The emission factor in the American Phase I
corresponds to a sulphur content in the coal of 1.6 per cent. Only
after Phase II comes into force in 2000 will a concentration
equivalent to 1400 mg SO2/m3 be attained. Hardly impressive, Schärer
comments, when compared with the current German limits of 400 mg/m3 for large plants and 800 mg/m3 for medium sized.
The effects of the regulations are clear from the trend of
emissions. Whereas in the period from the start of GFAVO in 1983, to
the completion of the program in the eastern Germany in 2000, a total
reduction of 90 per cent in SO2 emissions can be expected, the
reduction under the Clean Air Act between 1980 and 2010 will be barely
50 per cent.
The relative strictness of the requirements explains why the
American utilities can achieve cost-effective reductions for about
$400 per ton of SO2 - way under the average of DM2300 under the
German desulphurization program for large combustion plants. The
greater flexibility that the Americans are allowed, through the
trading system, will, according to EPA estimates, save in the end $1-2
billion a year or up to 50 per cent of the total cost of reduction.
It must nevertheless be kept in mind, says Schärer, that with
increasing strictness of the requirements and their adjustment to
technical improvements, there will be less leeway for the utilities to
practice inexpensive measures and economic balancing.
A remarkable phpect of the Acid Rain Program, as Schärer in
conclusion points out, is however the fact that 8.95 million tons
represents a final target for 2010, to which all utilities must adhere
- meaning that newcomers will have to buy their way into the system
before they can start operation.
G. HOWARD SMITH
Schärer's report appeared in Gefahrstoffe - Reinhaltung der
Luft 56 (1996) 3-4. See also AN 5/93, 5/94, 3/95, 5/95.
Back to top
US SPEED LIMITS
Effects of lifting them
NOW THAT President Clinton has signed into law a bill that includes
a provision eliminating speed limits of 55-65 mph as a prerequisite
for federal highway funding, many states are considering raising their
limits.
The speed limit on highways in the United States has since the oil
crisis in 1974 in practice been 55 mph (barely 90 km/h), although an
increase to 65 mph (105 km/h) on rural interstate freeways became
allowed through a modification of the law in 1987. Raising the limit
generally from 55 to 65 mph will, according to the EPA's computer
model, result in the following increase in the emissions from an
average petrol-driven car in America:
| |
Emissions (g/mile) |
Change % |
| |
55 mph |
65 mph |
| NOx |
2.19 |
2.40 |
+10 |
| VOCs |
0.59 |
0.92 |
+56 |
| CO |
7.60 |
19.24 |
+153 |
The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that a general
increase to 65 mph will result in an increase of 5 per cent in the
total emissions of NOx in the United States. In some parts of the
country the increase will approach 10 per cent. But there is a reason
to believe that many of the states will raise the limit to more than
65 mph, and several have in fact already done so, to 70 and 75 mph.
For lack of data, however, the EPA is unable to assess the effects of
these increases above 65 mph.
The increase in emissions resulting from driving at higher speeds
will make it difficult to come up to National Ambient Air Quality
Standards in places where they are still not being attained. It seems
the standards for emissions from other sources will have to be
tightened to compensate for the increased emissions from road traffic.
As vehicle speeds increase, fuel economy decreases - and markedly
so at speeds above something like 50 mph. On the national level,
raising the speed limits will result in a significant increase in fuel
consumption - thus making it more difficult to meet the reduction
targets for greenhouse gases. From the EPA analysis it appears that
carbon emissions will increase by 6-15 million tons per year - which
is about 6-15 per cent of the amount needed to return US emissions to
their 1990 level the year 2000.
Faster driving will also have effects that are likely to accentuate
the direct increase in emissions. Higher speeds will reduce travel
times, thus making it even more attractive to use the car rather than
other modes of transport. While travel times will probably not be
appreciably reduced in congested areas, there will be an increase in
car travel in areas that are not affected by congestion. Reduced
travel times will also encourage low-density suburban developments.
The EPA will now be gathering and analysing data on emissions from
vehicles moving at high speeds. A fresh statement of the effects of
eliminating the national speed limit can then be expected.
Source: Car Lines. March 1996.
Back to top
ISRAEL
Solar energy at an acceptable price
A NEW TECHNOLOGY for solar energy has been developed at the
Weizmann Institute in Israel. It involves using the sun's radiation
to heat up air to a very high temperature. The hot air then drives a
turbine to produce electricity. The high temperatures that are needed
are attained by using mirrors in a funnel-shaped device to greatly
concentrate the radiation, which is then sent through a quartz window
to heat ceramic pins around which the air flows. The array of pins
absorbs the solar energy and transfers heat to the surrounding air
very efficiently. The air is made to pass over the pins in a carefully
controlled stream before going on to drive the turbine.
According to one of the institute's scientists, Israel's
peak-hour electricity demand of 6000 megawatts could be provided by
solar power stations collecting sunlight from an area of 2000 hectares
- which is considerably less than that now taken up by the country's
fossil-fuelled plants.
The price of the electricity so generated should also be
acceptable. Uri Fischer, head of the Ormat technology consultancy, who
participated in the development of the new system, estimates the cost
of production to be 7 cents (US) per kilowatt-hour, although some
improvements still remain to be made.
Electricity from plants burning fossil fuels normally costs between
5 and 6 cents/kWh, but in many places may be much higher. The new
solar technology has yet to be tested in full scale, but Fischer hopes
to see it on the market within three or four years.
Source: New Scientist. May 11, 1996.
Back to top
In brief
Sulphur success
Power companies in the United States reduced their output of
sulphur dioxide by 5.6 million tons in 1995, far exceeding the cuts
demanded by the federal government, according to the Environmental
Protection Agency. In the first phase of the program 445 power plants
halved their annual emissions of sulphur dioxide, from 10.9 to 5.3
million tons, 39 per cent more than the reduction required by the EPA.
In the next phase, which begins year 2000, another 700 utilities will
be required to start reducing their emissions. According to the EPA
the industry is well on the way towards reducing its emissions of
sulphur dioxide by 10 million tons a year by the year 2010.
Source: New Scientist. April 6, 1996.
Transit traffic causes Swiss controversy
A big row has broken out in Switzerland after government
representatives had told the European Union that Switzerland was
prepared to lift its maximum limit of 28 tons for trucks.
A parliamentary working group had recommended that Switzerland
should allow 40-ton trucks into the country's hinterland from 2001
if they paid a performance-related charge for heavy goods. This has
however met with serious opposition from Swiss environmental groups
and leading experts, who say the charges will not bring in as much
revenue as expected and will lead to more goods going by road.
One reason for proposing to admit 40-ton trucks if they pay a
special charge may be the need to finance the two new tunnels through
the Alps that are intended to move freight transiting onto the
railways.
Most of the Swiss environmental groups have threatened to call a
referendum if the proposal to abolish the 28-ton limit should turn out
to be serious.
Source: T&E Bulletin. April 1996.
Competitive on Hawaii
Research and development are bringing about ever more efficient and
cheaper solar cells. The largest American solar power plant, with an
extreme capacity of 4 MW, is going to be built on Hawaii in 1997,
using solar cells made by Solarex. It is estimated that the total cost
will run to $7 million, of which the U.S. Department of Energy will
contribute $1 million. Commercial operation of a solar plant is made
possible by the high price of electricity on the islands, where it
averages 15-18 cents per kilowatt-hour.
Sveriges Tekniska Attachéer. January 1996.
What it costs
Acidification is costing Norwegians 300 million kroner (£30m) a
year in damage to buildings and motor vehicles alone. The damage is
worst, according to Statens Forurensningstilsyn, the pollution
watchdog, in the larger towns. Emissions from oil burning account for
almost half of the estimated damage. The agency says the charge on
sulphur emissions ought to be quadrupled if oil firing is to be made
to pay its actual cost to the community.
Source: Natur&Miljö Bulletin. April 19, 1996.
Mussel shells
To counteract the effects of acid fallout, thousands of tons of
limestone are dropped every year onto thousands of lakes in Sweden -
most of it coming from quarries in southern Sweden. Now however the
authorities have started to work with a canning company, ABBA, which
accumulates 12,000 tons of mussel shells a year as waste. Ground
mussel shells have been spread by way of trial over a number of river
and lake systems with unexpectedly good results. "Apart from the
positive phpects of mussel shells, their lime content and spreading
and dissolving qualities, this solution is attractive in that it makes
use of something that otherwise find its way onto rubbish tips, and
may obviate the need to dig up more ground around the limestone
quarries," says one official. So long as acid depositions
continue as at present, however, mussel shells can only meet a small
part of the need for liming.
Source: Svenska Dagbladet. March 6, 1996.
Moving slowly forward
"It is the right of every individual to breathe air that is
not detrimental to health." So reads the opening sentence of a
bill on air quality standards that was presented by the French
government in April. The wording, which in itself was a triumph for
Corinne Lepage, the environment minister, was passed despite the
protests of prominent lawyers who feared an avalanche of environmental
lawsuits. As regards concrete measures, however, little remains of
Lepage's original bill, apart from a requirement that all French
towns shall have installed equipment for measuring air quality before
the year 2000. The authorities will have the right to stop all
non-vital traffic on days when the air is exceptionally polluted.
There is also an obligation for all the larger municipalities to see
over their traffic arrangements. Some tax reliefs are imminent too -
for electric or gas-driven vehicles, and perhaps for all mass
transportation.
Source: Ny Teknik. No. 16, 1996.
Getting better
Air quality in the United States has improved over the last ten
years, asserts the Environmental Protection Agency in its latest
report entitled Air Quality Trends, covering the period from 1985 to
1994. But even in 1994 90 million Americans were still having to
breathe air that was not up to federal health standards. The number in
1990, though, was 140 million (the total population is 245 million).
Of the thirty-three areas where the federal health standards for smog
were still not being met in 1994, only Los Angeles fell into the "extreme" category. In ten areas the situation is classed as
"severe."
The EPA estimate that 90 million people are subject to smog levels
above the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone is being
questioned by the American Lung Association, which issued a report in
November saying that 161 million people were potentially at risk from
dangerous levels of ozone. The difference in the two estimates can be
explained by the fact that the ALA expresses the acceptable limit for
exposure to ozone differently from the EPA (0.07 ppm over an
eight-hour period instead of 0.12 ppm as a one-hour average), arguing
that recent research shows that people can be harmed by being exposed
to low levels of ozone over periods longer than one hour.
Source: Car Lines, M.P. Walsh. January 1996.
Worse than feared
Acid rain in China is far more severe and widespread than
originally feared, says the report on a three-year research project
that was published last December. The study, conducted by the Chinese
Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, revealed that 40 per cent
of the nation's land mass is now affected by acid rain. Beijing's
National Environmental Protection Agency had previously reported that
the extent of acid rain was limited to 29 per cent of the territory.
Officials from the National Environmental Protection Agency
estimate acid rain in southern China to be responsible for US$1.6
billion worth of damage to crops, forests, and property each year, and
that all but five or six of the nation's major cities fail to meet
international standards for environmental quality.
While energy planners have been announcing the need for a greatly
increased use of coal to meet the demand for energy during the next
few years, EPA officials have pledged that special projects to curb
the most severe cases of air pollution will be carried out in nine
cities next year, with financing from an $880 million loan approved by
the Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund of Japan. China also intends to
spend a total of $18.7 billion on environmental cleanup over the next
five years under the state's "Cross-Century Green
Project."
Source: Car Lines, M.P. Walsh. March 1996.
Dusty air
The emissions of particles from London traffic would have to be
reduced by at least two-thirds - and up to 80 per cent in places
where traffic is thickest - if the limit recommended last year by
the Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards is not to be exceeded. This
can be read in a report presented in May by the government Quality of
Urban Air review group. It found that 86 per cent of the PM10 -
particles with a diameter of less than 10 micrometres - in the
London air comes from road traffic.
Source: New Scientist. May 18, 1996.
Cleaner shipping
All four main engines and all the auxiliary engines on the ferry
Stena Jutlandica have been fitted with catalyzers - making it the
first ferry in the world to have exhaust-gas cleaning on all its
engines. This has reduced the emissions of nitrogen oxides by 90 per
cent and those of volatile organic compounds and particulates by 80
and 30 per cent respectively. The managing director of the Stena
group, opining that this improvement in respect of the environment
will pay in the long, calls it an investment for the future.
Source: Ny Teknik. No. 11, 1996.
Profitable to tax pollution
A more than doubling of the country's tax on carbon dioxide, from
160 to 360 kroner per ton of CO2, combined with a lowering of 2.5 per
cent in the employment charge, would, according to a study released by
the Norwegian Department of Finance, in time increase the country's
GDP by 0.5 per cent and employment by 0.75 per cent. The sectors that
would be hardest hit are metal alloys and the fish-oil and fish-meal
industries. Aluminium production, petrochemicals, and pulp making
would on the other hand come out relatively unscathed.
Source: Dagens Nyheter. April 23, 1996.
Voluntary commitment
German industry has tightened its voluntary commitment to reduce
emissions of carbon dioxide. The original agreement, presented last
year, called for a reduction of CO2 emissions by "up to 20 per
cent" by 2005 from 1987 levels. The new commitment moves the base
year up to 1990 and sets 20 per cent as the definitive target. This
translates into a cut of 120 million tons of CO2 in the manufacturing,
electricity generating, and decentralized heat sectors. An additional
reduction of 50 million tons will come from gas and water supply.
German industry has also agreed to have an independent body monitoring
the emissions. For its part, the government has announced it has no
plans to introduce a national CO2/energy tax and would exempt those
parts of the industry that adhere to the voluntary commitment from any
EU-wide tax.
Source: Environment Watch: Western Europe. April 5, 1996.
Not succeeding
Austria is hardly likely to meet its reduction targets for nitrogen
oxides, volatile organic compounds, and carbon dioxide, according to
the latest monitoring report from the Umweltbundesamt. Existing
legislation calls for a 40-per-cent reduction, from 1985, for NOx, and
from 1988 for VOCs - both by the end of 1996. There were to be
further cuts to 60 per cent by the end of 2001, and to 70 per cent by
the end of 2006.
The emissions of carbon dioxide were to be reduced by 20 per cent
between 1988 and 2005, but according to the report, by 1994 they had
risen by 8 per cent, so that attainment of the target will require a
30-per-cent reduction in the nine remaining years.
Source: Environment Watch: Western Europe. March 1, 1996.
World cleanest
From June 1 all the petrol sold in California must have been
reformulated so as to meet the most stringent environmental
requirements that have so far been applied anywhere. "The effect
of the ruling will be to reduce the emissions of substances that cause
the formation of ozone and smog by 15 per cent. It will be as if we
were to clear the roads of 3.5 million cars," says Allan Hirsch,
speaking for the California Air Resources Board, the authority
policing air quality in the state.
Petrol must now have lower contents of toxic substances such as
sulphur, benzene, and aromatics, lower internal pressure to reduce
evaporation, and a standardized oxygen content to improve combustion.
To meet these new requirements the oil companies have been forced to
invest $4 billion. The extra cost of production is estimated to add 3
cents to every litre sold, but because of the intense competition
between the oil companies, it is thought that the rise will actually
be less.
Source: Ny Teknik No. 11, 1996.
On the march
Whereas some years ago the construction cost of wind power was
about 10,000 kronor per kilowatt of capacity, it is now down to 7000
kronor, which means that wind power will often be able to compete in
price with electricity generated in new coal-fired and nuclear plants.
This came out at the European Union Wind Energy Conference, which drew
more than 500 participants to Göteborg for a week in May. The
expansion of wind power in Europe during the last three years - from
1000 to 2500 MW installed capacity - has been greater than expected.
Wind turbines now generate some 5 TWh of electricity per annum in
Europe, but there is a theoretical potential of 350 TWh/yr.
Source: Ny Teknik No. 21, 1996.
Stopping Ku Klux Klan
Air quality legislation is being used in California to stop the Ku
Klux Klan's cross burning, which has been used to terrorize blacks
and other minority groups. Cross burning has not been illegal,
provided it has been started by the owner of the property on which it
takes place and is not intended to intimidate. The authorities in the
San Joaquin Valley have now however taken action, referring to the
effects on air quality. "This is not about anyone's political
motivations. The regulations are strict because the valley traps
pollution. If everyone burnt crosses the result would be
disastrous," says one of their spokesmen.
Source: New Scientist. March 9, 1996.
Small is ugly
As from last August all small petrol engines sold in California
have had to meet high emission standards - which will become even
stricter in 1999. There are however still some 1.7 million old lawn
movers, leaf blowers, chain saws, and other garden power tools in use
around Los Angeles alone. This ageing fleet is estimated to belch out
more than 22 tons of smog-forming chemicals a day. In order to get rid
of these machines as quickly as possible, firms can now buy up
second-hand garden equipment and by scrapping it obtain a clean-air
credit. They can either use such credits to offset any of their own
excess emissions or sell them to other firms.
Source: New Scientist. May 25, 1996.
Recovering the cost
Given Swedish climatic conditions, normal solar panels for heating
water will make up for the energy it takes to build them within a
year. The time taken to recover the energy cost will depend mainly on
the quantity of aluminium in the construction. Solar collectors that
are integral with the roof of a building, which contain less aluminium
than others and moreover replace the ordinary roofing, repay the
energy used in their production within three to six months.
The most reliable solar panels for generating electricity, composed
of crystalline silicon cells, consume a lot of energy in their
production. Calculations of the time needed to recover the cost in
terms of electricity vary from 4-5 to just over two years, depending
on various assumptions. For amorphous silicon cells the time is 2-3 to
just one year.
Silicon cells are thought to have a life of 20-30 years. Cells of
the thin-layer type need less energy for their production than silicon
cells, but contain metals that are either rare or harmful to the
environment (or both) such as cadmium and indium.
Source: Solsverige Part 6, 1995. Yearbook of the Svenska
Solenergiföreningen.
A quiet start
In Taipei, the capital of Taiwan, China, the government has set a
requirement that by 1998, 5 per cent of motorcycles offered for sale
must be electric. To spur demand, it is coupling the mandate with a
tax rebate. Of all vehicles in the city more than 75 per cent are
motorcycles.
Source: Tomorrow Magazine, Spring 1996.
Risky oversight
Up to 95 per cent of all the emissions from cars may be laid to
cold starts and heavy loading. Neither of these forms part however of
the present test cycle, and the European Federation for Transport and
Environment warns that unless the European Commission takes cold
starts and heavy loading into account in its proposal for vehicle
emission limits, its estimates for the reductions that are aimed at
may turn out to be widely overoptimistic.
Emissions from 36 car models. Test results from cars subjected to
heavy loads and a supplementary test cycle. By Per Kågeson. T&E
Report 96/4. Available from T&E, www.t-e.nu.
German speed limits
Verkehrsclub Deutschland, the German member organization of
T&E, has lost a battle to challenge Germany's lack of a national
speed limit in the country's Federal Constitutional Court. The VCD
claimed that the lack of a maximum speed limit was unconstitutional as
Article 2 of the German basic law guarantees all German citizens
"the right to life and to be bodily unhurt", it said fast
speeds on German motorways were undermining that right by causing
thousands of deaths and injury each year.
The court rejected the challenge, saying existing regulations were "not obviously insufficient" to protect the German people
against threats from car traffic. However, a number of newspapers
criticized the judgement, including the Berlin Tagesspiegel which
described it as "cynical."
Source: T&E Bulletin, March 1996.
Back to top
Recent publications
Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants in OECD Countries (1996)
This report outlines an overall control strategy for dealing with
hazardous air pollutants, and puts forward recommendations on the
setting of priorities. It draws heavily on detailed case studies in
France, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, the United
States, and Japan. 236 pp. Obtainable from OECD, 2, rue Andre-Pascal,
75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Fax +33-1 45 24 80 03.
Memorandum on transport and environment to the Council of
Ministers and the Italian and Irish Presidencies (1996)
Covers most of the issues concerning transport and environment
policy which are, or according to the T&E (European Federation for
Transport and Environment) should be on the Council's agenda in
1996. 24 pp. Free of charge. T&E Publication 2/96. Obtainable from
the T&E, www.t-e.nu.
Response to the Commision's Green Paper "Towards Fair and
Efficient Pricing in Transport" (1996)
8 pp. Free of charge. T&E Publication 96/3. Published by
T&E, address as above.
The global climate is changing (1996)
A discussion of the options for continuance of the negotiations
under the Climate Convention. Various principles are discussed for the
shaping of a protocol in respect of efficiency, equity, feasibility
and the consequences for Sweden. 30 pp. Available from the Swedish
Environmental Protection Agency, S-106 48 Stockholm, Sweden.
Smog Alert - Managing Urban Air Quality (1996)
By D. Elsom. Examines the causes and scale of urban air pollution,
identifying those who are most at risk, and which particular health
risks various pollutants give rise to. It also considers the design of
an effective framework for air quality management. Detailed case
studies illustrate the severity and breadth of the problems. 220 pp. £13.95. Published by Earthscan, 120 Pentonville Road, London, England
N1 9JN. Fax +44-171-278 1142.
Back to top |
|
|
|